The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Arieh Shalhav to Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Arieh Shalhav has written about Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures.
  1. The volume of nonneoplastic parenchyma in a minimally invasive partial nephrectomy specimen: predictive factors and impact on renal function. J Endourol. 2014 Feb; 28(2):196-200.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.342
  2. Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive versus open lymphadenectomy in urological cancers. Curr Opin Urol. 2013 Jan; 23(1):57-64.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.323
  3. The impact of body mass index on renal functional outcomes following minimally invasive partial nephrectomy. J Endourol. 2014 Nov; 28(11):1338-44.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.090
  4. Evolution of open radical retropubic prostatectomy--how have open surgeons responded to the challenge of minimally invasive surgery? J Endourol. 2009 Nov; 23(11):1893-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.065
  5. High intensity focused ultrasound renal tissue ablation: a laparoscopic porcine model. J Urol. 2009 Feb; 181(2):861-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.061
  6. Laparoscopic management of renal tumors. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2007 Jun; 5(5):306-17.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  7. Use of suspension traction system for renal positioning during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. J Endourol. 2005 Apr; 19(3):406-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  8. Controversial cases in endourology. J Endourol. 2001 Aug; 15(6):591-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  9. Differential use of partial nephrectomy for intermediate and high complexity tumors may explain variability in reported utilization rates. J Urol. 2013 Jun; 189(6):2047-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  10. Factors that impact the outcome of minimally invasive pyeloplasty: results of the Multi-institutional Laparoscopic and Robotic Pyeloplasty Collaborative Group. J Urol. 2012 Feb; 187(2):522-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.