The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Lainie Ross to Adolescent

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Lainie Ross has written about Adolescent.
Connection Strength

2.339
  1. Arguments against respecting a minor's refusal of efficacious life-saving treatment redux, part II. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2009; 18(4):432-40; discussion 440-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.118
  2. Teenage Development and Parental Authority: applying consensus recommendations to adolescent care. Perspect Biol Med. 2024; 67(2):227-243.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.084
  3. How Race, Ethnicity, and Social Determinants of Health Are Reported in Three European Pediatric Journals. J Pediatr. 2023 08; 259:113454.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.080
  4. Adolescent autonomy in health care? APA Newsl Philos Med. 2003; 2(2):193-200.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.078
  5. State Versus Adolescent Override for Parental Refusals to Vaccinate Against COVID-19. Pediatrics. 2022 05 01; 149(5).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.074
  6. 50 Years Ago in TheJournalofPediatrics: Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Contextualized. J Pediatr. 2021 Oct; 237:58.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.072
  7. Reflections on Ethics and Advocacy in Child Health (REACH): Creating a Forum for Ethical Dialogue. J Pediatr. 2021 04; 231:5-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.068
  8. Why Most Bad Decisions About Vaccines Do Not Constitute Child Neglect. Pediatr Neurol. 2020 12; 113:85-87.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.067
  9. Reopening K-12 Schools in the Era of Coronavirus Disease 2019: Review of State-Level Guidance Addressing Equity Concerns. J Pediatr. 2020 12; 227:38-44.e7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.066
  10. Ethical Issues Raised by the Media Portrayal of Adolescent Transplant Refusals. Pediatrics. 2020 08; 146(Suppl 1):S33-S41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.066
  11. The Pediatrician's Moral Obligation to Counsel Directively Against Youth Tackle Football. J Clin Ethics. 2020; 31(4):331-337.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.063
  12. 50 Years Ago in TheJournal ofPediatrics: Why Patients Don't Follow Medical Advice: A Study of Children on Long-Term Antistreptococcal Prophylaxis. J Pediatr. 2019 12; 215:63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.063
  13. Surrogate Decision Making for Children: Who Should Decide? J Pediatr. 2020 05; 220:221-226.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.063
  14. 50 Years Ago in TheJournal ofPediatrics: Parents of the Mentally Retarded Child: Emotionally Overwhelmed or Informationally Deprived? J Pediatr. 2019 Jun; 209:106.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.061
  15. Missed Opportunities in the Preparticipation Physical Examination for High School Athletes. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2019 05; 58(5):547-554.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.060
  16. Pediatric bioethics: reintroducing the parents. Responsive Community. 1999; 9(3):40-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.059
  17. Public Attitudes and Knowledge About Youth Sports Participation and Concussion Risk in an Urban Area. J Natl Med Assoc. 2018 Dec; 110(6):635-643.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.058
  18. Attitudes and Counseling Practices of Pediatricians Regarding Youth Sports Participation and Concussion Risks. J Pediatr. 2017 05; 184:19-25.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  19. Kidney Donor Profile Index Does Not Accurately Predict the Graft Survival of Pediatric Deceased Donor Kidneys. Transplantation. 2016 Nov; 100(11):2471-2478.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  20. Adolescent sexuality and public policy: an unrepentant liberal approach. Politics Life Sci. 1996 Sep; 15(2):323-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  21. Adolescent sexuality and public policy: a liberal response. Politics Life Sci. 1996 Mar; 15(1):13-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  22. Should Medical Errors Be Disclosed to Pediatric Patients? Pediatricians' Attitudes Toward Error Disclosure. Acad Pediatr. 2016 07; 16(5):482-488.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  23. Pediatric DTC Genetic Testing for Adult-Onset Inherited Cancer Risk: The Perspectives of High-Risk Parents. Public Health Genomics. 2025; 28(1):102-112.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  24. Arguments against health care autonomy for minors. Bioethics Forum. 1995; 11(4):22-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  25. Relational autonomy: moving beyond the limits of isolated individualism. Pediatrics. 2014 Feb; 133 Suppl 1:S16-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  26. A pilot study to evaluate awareness of and attitudes about prenatal and neonatal genetic testing in postpartum African American women. J Natl Med Assoc. 2013; 105(1):85-91.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  27. Age should not be considered in the allocation of deceased donor kidneys. Semin Dial. 2012 Nov-Dec; 25(6):675-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  28. Sickle cell trait screening in athletes: pediatricians' attitudes and concerns. Pediatrics. 2011 Sep; 128(3):477-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  29. Ethical and policy issues raised by heterozygote carrier identification and predictive genetic testing of adolescents. Adolesc Med State Art Rev. 2011 Aug; 22(2):251-64, ix.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  30. Reactions of pediatricians to refusals of medical treatment for minors. J Adolesc Health. 2010 Aug; 47(2):126-32.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  31. Maternal knowledge and attitudes about newborn screening for sickle cell disease and cystic fibrosis. Am J Med Genet A. 2009 Nov; 149A(11):2424-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  32. Against the tide: arguments against respecting a minor's refusal of efficacious life-saving treatment. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2009; 18(3):302-15; discussion 315-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  33. Pediatricians are more supportive of the human papillomavirus vaccine than the general public. South Med J. 2008 Dec; 101(12):1216-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  34. Ethical and policy lessons to be learned from a family with inherited bone marrow failure. Am J Med Genet A. 2008 Nov 01; 146A(21):2715-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  35. Minors as living solid-organ donors. Pediatrics. 2008 Aug; 122(2):454-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  36. From genetics to genomics: ethics, policy, and parental decision-making. J Pediatr Psychol. 2009 Jul; 34(6):639-47.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  37. An empirical investigation of physicians' attitudes toward intrasibling kidney donation by minor twins. Transplantation. 2008 May 15; 85(9):1235-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  38. Attitudes of minority patients with end-stage renal disease regarding ABO-incompatible list-paired exchanges. Am J Transplant. 2006 Jan; 6(1):83-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  39. A compounding of errors: the case of bone marrow donation between non-intimate siblings. J Clin Ethics. 2006; 17(3):220-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  40. Heterozygote carrier testing in high schools abroad: what are the lessons for the U.S.? J Law Med Ethics. 2006; 34(4):753-64.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  41. Access and equity to cancer care in the USA: a review and assessment. Postgrad Med J. 2005 Nov; 81(961):674-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  42. Parental Communication With their Children about Cancer Risk and DTC Cascade Genetic Testing: Implications for Genetic Education and Counseling. Am J Med Genet A. 2025 Sep; 197(9):e64115.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  43. The Newborn Screening Experience of Caregivers of Children With Cystic Fibrosis in the United States: A Cross-Sectional Survey. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2025 May; 60(5):e71110.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  44. Lessons to be learned from the 407 process. Health Matrix Clevel. 2005; 15(2):401-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  45. Should children and adolescents undergo genetic testing? Pediatr Ann. 2004 Nov; 33(11):762-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  46. Graft Survival of En Bloc Deceased Donor Kidneys Transplants Compared With Single Kidney Transplants. Transplantation. 2024 10 01; 108(10):2127-2133.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  47. Children in medical research: balancing protection and access--has the pendulum swung too far? Perspect Biol Med. 2004; 47(4):519-36.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  48. Are minority children under- or overrepresented in pediatric research? Pediatrics. 2003 Oct; 112(4):890-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  49. Professional and personal attitudes about access and confidentiality in the genetic testing of children: a pilot study. Genet Test. 2003; 7(2):123-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  50. Genetic testing of adolescents: is it in their best interest? Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2000 Aug; 154(8):850-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  51. Reopening Schools Safely: The Case for Collaboration, Constructive Disruption of Pre-Coronavirus 2019 Expectations, and Creative Solutions. J Pediatr. 2020 08; 223:183-185.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  52. Donating a second kidney: a tale of family and ethics. Semin Dial. 2000 May-Jun; 13(3):201-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  53. Age and equity in liver transplantation: An organ allocation model. Liver Transpl. 2015 Oct; 21(10):1241-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  54. Racial disparities in reaching the renal transplant waitlist: is geography as important as race? Clin Transplant. 2015 Jun; 29(6):531-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  55. Justice for children: the child as organ donor. Bioethics. 1994 Apr; 8(2):105-26.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  56. A K-nearest neighbors survival probability prediction method. Stat Med. 2013 May 30; 32(12):2062-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  57. Neighborhood poverty, racial composition and renal transplant waitlist. Am J Transplant. 2010 Aug; 10(8):1912-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  58. Disclosing the diagnosis of HIV in pediatrics. J Clin Ethics. 2001; 12(2):150-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.