The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Lainie Ross to Pediatrics

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Lainie Ross has written about Pediatrics.
Lainie Ross
Connection Strength
16.764
Pediatrics
  1. How Race, Ethnicity, and Social Determinants of Health Are Reported in Three European Pediatric Journals. J Pediatr. 2023 08; 259:113454.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.572
  2. Expounding on Shared Decision-Making in Pediatrics. J Pediatr. 2022 12; 251:3-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.547
  3. Reflections on Ethics and Advocacy in Child Health (REACH): Creating a Forum for Ethical Dialogue. J Pediatr. 2021 04; 231:5-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.487
  4. Impact of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic on Authorship Gender in The Journal of Pediatrics: Disproportionate Productivity by International Male Researchers. J Pediatr. 2021 04; 231:50-54.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.485
  5. 50 Years Ago in TheJournalofPediatrics: Shifting Attitudes toward the Disclosure of Serious Illness. J Pediatr. 2020 05; 220:48.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.463
  6. 50 Years Ago in TheJournalofPediatrics: Renal Homotransplantations in Children. J Pediatr. 2020 03; 218:15.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.458
  7. The Pediatrician's Moral Obligation to Counsel Directively Against Youth Tackle Football. J Clin Ethics. 2020; 31(4):331-337.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.453
  8. 50 Years Ago in TheJournal ofPediatrics: Parents of the Mentally Retarded Child: Emotionally Overwhelmed or Informationally Deprived? J Pediatr. 2019 Jun; 209:106.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.435
  9. 50 Years Ago in The Journal of Pediatrics: Prenatal Detection of Genetic Defects. J Pediatr. 2019 01; 204:45.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.423
  10. Better than Best (Interest Standard) in Pediatric Decision Making. J Clin Ethics. 2019; 30(3):183-195.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.423
  11. In Further Defense of "Better than Best (Interest)". J Clin Ethics. 2019; 30(3):232-239.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.423
  12. The Role of Gender in Publication in The Journal of Pediatrics 2015-2016: Equal Reviews, Unequal Opportunities. J Pediatr. 2018 09; 200:254-260.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.409
  13. 50 Years Ago in The Journal of Pediatrics: Editorial Comment: Therapeutic Orphans. J Pediatr. 2018 01; 192:59.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.394
  14. Gender Differences in the Authorship of Original Research in Pediatric Journals, 2001-2016. J Pediatr. 2017 12; 191:244-249.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.388
  15. Attitudes and Counseling Practices of Pediatricians Regarding Youth Sports Participation and Concussion Risks. J Pediatr. 2017 05; 184:19-25.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.372
  16. 50 Years Ago in The Journal of Pediatrics: Conference on Treatment of Phenylketonuria. J Pediatr. 2017 01; 180:169.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.368
  17. The Best Interest Standard: Same Name but Different Roles in Pediatric Bioethics and Child Rights Frameworks. Perspect Biol Med. 2017; 60(2):186-197.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.368
  18. 50 Years Ago in TheJournal ofPediatrics: Evaluation of the Effects of Terminating the Diet in Phenylketonuria. J Pediatr. 2016 10; 177:113.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.362
  19. 50 Years Ago in TheJournal ofPediatrics: Legislation and Advances in Medical Knowledge-Acceleration or Inhibition? J Pediatr. 2016 08; 175:53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.357
  20. Theory and Practice of Pediatric Bioethics. Perspect Biol Med. 2016; 58(3):267-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.343
  21. Pediatric Resident Preparedness and Educational Experiences With Informed Consent. Acad Pediatr. 2016 Apr; 16(3):298-304.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.338
  22. 50 Years Ago in The Journal of Pediatrics: Phenylketonuria in a Negro Infant. J Pediatr. 2015 Aug; 167(2):304.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.333
  23. Pediatric Professionals' Attitudes about Secondary Findings in Genomic Sequencing of Children. J Pediatr. 2015 May; 166(5):1276-1282.e7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.324
  24. Relational autonomy: moving beyond the limits of isolated individualism. Pediatrics. 2014 Feb; 133 Suppl 1:S16-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.301
  25. Teaching and assessment of ethics and professionalism: a survey of pediatric program directors. Acad Pediatr. 2013 Nov-Dec; 13(6):570-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.295
  26. Young physicians' recall about pediatric training in ethics and professionalism and its practical utility. J Pediatr. 2013 Oct; 163(4):1196-201.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.286
  27. Identification and management of sickle cell trait by young physicians. J Natl Med Assoc. 2012 May-Jun; 104(5-6):299-304.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.266
  28. Sickle cell trait screening in athletes: pediatricians' attitudes and concerns. Pediatrics. 2011 Sep; 128(3):477-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.253
  29. A pilot study to evaluate knowledge and attitudes of Illinois pediatricians toward newborn screening for sickle cell disease and cystic fibrosis. Am J Perinatol. 2011 Mar; 28(3):169-76.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.238
  30. Reactions of pediatricians to refusals of medical treatment for minors. J Adolesc Health. 2010 Aug; 47(2):126-32.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.232
  31. When physicians forego the doctor-patient relationship, should they elect to self-prescribe or curbside? An empirical and ethical analysis. J Med Ethics. 2010 Jan; 36(1):19-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.227
  32. Ethics and professionalism in the pediatric curriculum: a survey of pediatric program directors. Pediatrics. 2009 Oct; 124(4):1143-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.222
  33. Pediatricians' attitudes toward resuscitation in children with chronic illnesses. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2009 May; 10(3):369-74.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.216
  34. Qualitative insights into how pediatric pay-for-performance programs are being designed. Acad Pediatr. 2009 May-Jun; 9(3):185-91.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.216
  35. A descriptive and moral evaluation of providing informal medical care to one's own children. J Clin Ethics. 2009; 20(4):353-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.211
  36. Paediatricians' attitudes and practices towards HPV vaccination. Acta Paediatr. 2008 Nov; 97(11):1550-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.205
  37. Ethical and policy issues in pediatric genetics. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2008 Feb 15; 148C(1):1-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.199
  38. Attitudes and beliefs of pediatricians and genetic counselors regarding testing and screening for CF and G6PD: implications for policy. Am J Med Genet A. 2006 Nov 01; 140(21):2305-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.182
  39. Phase I research and the meaning of direct benefit. J Pediatr. 2006 Jul; 149(1 Suppl):S20-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.178
  40. Does familiarity breed acceptance? The influence of policy on physicians' attitudes toward newborn screening programs. Pediatrics. 2006 May; 117(5):1477-85.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.176
  41. Pediatric research and the federal minimal risk standard. JAMA. 2006 Feb 15; 295(7):759; author reply 759-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.173
  42. In defense of a single standard of research risk for all children. J Pediatr. 2005 Nov; 147(5):565-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.170
  43. Pediatricians' attitudes toward expanding newborn screening. Pediatrics. 2005 Oct; 116(4):e476-84.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.169
  44. The participation of minorities in published pediatric research. J Natl Med Assoc. 2005 Jun; 97(6):777-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.165
  45. No Vaccine, No Organ? Ethics of Vaccine Mandates for Pediatric Transplant. Pediatr Transplant. 2025 Feb; 29(1):e70019.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.161
  46. Lessons to be learned from the 407 process. Health Matrix Clevel. 2005; 15(2):401-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.160
  47. Attitudes of healthcare professionals and parents regarding genetic testing for violent traits in childhood. J Med Ethics. 2004 Dec; 30(6):580-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.159
  48. Should children and adolescents undergo genetic testing? Pediatr Ann. 2004 Nov; 33(11):762-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.158
  49. How We Found Consensus on Pediatric Decision-Making and Why It Matters. Perspect Biol Med. 2024; 67(2):186-196.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.149
  50. Are minority children under- or overrepresented in pediatric research? Pediatrics. 2003 Oct; 112(4):890-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.147
  51. Whether and why pediatric researchers report race and ethnicity. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003 Jul; 157(7):671-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.144
  52. Why "doctor, if this were your child, what would you do?" deserves an answer. J Clin Ethics. 2003 Spring-Summer; 14(1-2):59-62.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.142
  53. The ethics of type 1 diabetes prediction and prevention research. Theor Med Bioeth. 2003; 24(2):177-97.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.139
  54. Are research ethics standards satisfied in pediatric journal publications? Pediatrics. 2002 Aug; 110(2 Pt 1):364-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.135
  55. The Journal of Pediatrics Turns 90! A Perspective on Progress, Opportunities, and Challenges. J Pediatr. 2022 07; 246:235-241.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.135
  56. In defense of the Hopkins Lead Abatement Studies. J Law Med Ethics. 2002; 30(1):50-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.130
  57. Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in The Journal of Pediatrics. J Pediatr. 2021 09; 236:4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.126
  58. SARS-CoV-2 vaccine testing and trials in the pediatric population: biologic, ethical, research, and implementation challenges. Pediatr Res. 2021 11; 90(5):966-970.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.123
  59. Pediatric bioethics: reintroducing the parents. Responsive Community. 1999; 9(3):40-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.106
  60. Communicating with parents about immunization safety: messages for pediatricians in the IOM report "the childhood immunization schedule and safety: stakeholder concerns, scientific evidence, and future studies". Acad Pediatr. 2013 Sep-Oct; 13(5):387-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.073
  61. In defense of the American Academy of Pediatrics policy statement--children as hematopoietic stem cell donors. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2011 Apr; 56(4):520-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.061
  62. Pediatricians are more supportive of the human papillomavirus vaccine than the general public. South Med J. 2008 Dec; 101(12):1216-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  63. Minors as living solid-organ donors. Pediatrics. 2008 Aug; 122(2):454-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  64. American academy of pediatrics policy statements on bioethics: summaries and commentaries: part 3. Pediatr Rev. 2008 May; 29(5):e28-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  65. American Academy of Pediatrics policy statements on bioethics: summaries and commentaries: part 2. Pediatr Rev. 2008 Mar; 29(3):e15-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  66. American Academy of Pediatrics policy statements on bioethics: summaries and commentaries: part 1. Pediatr Rev. 2008 Jan; 29(1):e1-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  67. Do peer guidelines or editorial policies affect the reporting and discussion of race and ethnicity in pediatric research? Account Res. 2005 Jan-Mar; 12(1):17-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  68. Lethal language, lethal decisions. Hastings Cent Rep. 2003 Mar-Apr; 33(2):37-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  69. Adolescent autonomy in health care? APA Newsl Philos Med. 2003; 2(2):193-200.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  70. Ethical issues in genetic testing of children. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2000 Sep; 154(9):873-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  71. Addressing the ethical challenges in genetic testing and sequencing of children. Am J Bioeth. 2014; 14(3):3-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.