Lainie Ross to Humans
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Lainie Ross has written about Humans.
Connection Strength
4.131
-
Parents Don't Know Best in the United Kingdom. Am J Bioeth. 2024 Jan; 24(1):103-106.
Score: 0.032
-
Misleading Statements About Children as Living Organ Donors. Pediatrics. 2023 Dec 01; 152(6).
Score: 0.032
-
Against the Equality of Moral Spheres in Healthcare. Am J Bioeth. 2023 12; 23(12):23-25.
Score: 0.032
-
Representation of Women in Published Articles at 3 Academic Pediatric Journals: 2001 to 2022. Pediatrics. 2023 10 01; 152(4).
Score: 0.031
-
The Philosophical Underpinning of the Family for Pediatric Decision-Making. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2024 Feb; 71(1):27-37.
Score: 0.031
-
Pediatric Decision Making: Consensus Recommendations. Pediatrics. 2023 09 01; 152(3).
Score: 0.031
-
The Research Protection-Inclusion Dilemma in Pregnancy: Who is Being Protected? Who is Being Included? Am J Bioeth. 2023 06; 23(6):103-106.
Score: 0.030
-
How Race, Ethnicity, and Social Determinants of Health Are Reported in Three European Pediatric Journals. J Pediatr. 2023 08; 259:113454.
Score: 0.030
-
Coding the Dead: Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation for Organ Preservation. AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2023; 14(3):167-173.
Score: 0.030
-
The Dead Donor Rule Does Require that the Donor is Dead. Am J Bioeth. 2023 02; 23(2):12-14.
Score: 0.030
-
Diagnosis, treatment and disclosure: A qualitative exploration of participant challenges in a Monogenic Diabetes Registry. Genet Med. 2023 04; 25(4):100019.
Score: 0.030
-
50 Years Ago in TheJournalofPediatrics: Points to Consider: Sickle Cell Screening. J Pediatr. 2022 Dec; 251:126.
Score: 0.029
-
Clarifying the Blurry Boundaries between Research and Clinical Care. Am J Bioeth. 2022 10; 22(10):96-98.
Score: 0.029
-
Expounding on Shared Decision-Making in Pediatrics. J Pediatr. 2022 Dec; 251:3-5.
Score: 0.029
-
Is it Reasonable to Demand Reasons in Pediatric Decision-Making? J Pediatr. 2022 Dec; 251:36-37.
Score: 0.029
-
50 Years Ago in TheJournalofPediatrics: Public Health Redux. J Pediatr. 2022 09; 248:38.
Score: 0.029
-
The philosopher as partner: an introduction to the scholarship of Robert M. Veatch. Theor Med Bioeth. 2022 08; 43(4):179-185.
Score: 0.029
-
State Versus Adolescent Override for Parental Refusals to Vaccinate Against COVID-19. Pediatrics. 2022 05 01; 149(5).
Score: 0.028
-
The Use of Race, Ethnicity, and Social Determinants of Health in Three Pediatrics Journals. J Pediatr. 2022 08; 247:81-86.e3.
Score: 0.028
-
COVID-19 Vaccine Refusal and Organ Transplantation. Am J Kidney Dis. 2022 06; 79(6):771-773.
Score: 0.028
-
The case against COVID-19 vaccine mandates in pediatric solid organ transplantation. Pediatr Transplant. 2022 11; 26(7):e14243.
Score: 0.028
-
50 Years Ago in TheJournalofPediatrics: Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Contextualized. J Pediatr. 2021 Oct; 237:58.
Score: 0.027
-
"Medical Benefit" and Therapeutic Misconception: The Ethical Conundrum of Phase 1 Pediatric Oncology Research. J Pediatr. 2021 11; 238:11-13.
Score: 0.027
-
Ethics of Organ Transplantation in Persons with Intellectual Disability. J Pediatr. 2021 08; 235:6-9.
Score: 0.026
-
Mandatory Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccine for Children?-Reply. JAMA Pediatr. 2021 05 01; 175(5):534.
Score: 0.026
-
Gender and race/ethnicity differences in living kidney donor demographics: Preference or disparity? Transplant Rev (Orlando). 2021 07; 35(3):100614.
Score: 0.026
-
Analyzing Trends in the Global Surge of Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic Submissions to The Journal of Pediatrics. J Pediatr. 2021 06; 233:273-276.e1.
Score: 0.026
-
Should We Mandate a COVID-19 Vaccine for Children? JAMA Pediatr. 2021 02 01; 175(2):125-126.
Score: 0.026
-
Reflections on Ethics and Advocacy in Child Health (REACH): Creating a Forum for Ethical Dialogue. J Pediatr. 2021 04; 231:5-6.
Score: 0.026
-
Impact of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic on Authorship Gender in The Journal of Pediatrics: Disproportionate Productivity by International Male Researchers. J Pediatr. 2021 04; 231:50-54.
Score: 0.026
-
Why Most Bad Decisions About Vaccines Do Not Constitute Child Neglect. Pediatr Neurol. 2020 12; 113:85-87.
Score: 0.025
-
50 Years Ago in The Journal of Pediatrics: Plus ça Change: Halfway Technologies in Pediatrics. J Pediatr. 2020 09; 224:29.
Score: 0.025
-
Reopening K-12 Schools in the Era of Coronavirus Disease 2019: Review of State-Level Guidance Addressing Equity Concerns. J Pediatr. 2020 12; 227:38-44.e7.
Score: 0.025
-
Ethical Issues Raised by the Media Portrayal of Adolescent Transplant Refusals. Pediatrics. 2020 08; 146(Suppl 1):S33-S41.
Score: 0.025
-
Reflections on Charlie Gard and the Best Interests Standard From Both Sides of the Atlantic Ocean. Pediatrics. 2020 08; 146(Suppl 1):S60-S65.
Score: 0.025
-
The Ethical Limits of Children's Participation in Clinical Research. Hastings Cent Rep. 2020 Jul; 50(4):12-13.
Score: 0.025
-
The Harms of Carrier Status Identification: A Cautionary Warning Against Newborn Sequencing. J Pediatr. 2020 09; 224:22-23.
Score: 0.025
-
50 Years Ago in TheJournalofPediatrics: Shifting Attitudes toward the Disclosure of Serious Illness. J Pediatr. 2020 05; 220:48.
Score: 0.025
-
50 Years Ago in TheJournalofPediatrics: Renal Homotransplantations in Children. J Pediatr. 2020 03; 218:15.
Score: 0.024
-
50 Years Ago in TheJournal ofPediatrics: A New Diagnostic Test for Hemoglobin S. J Pediatr. 2020 01; 216:18.
Score: 0.024
-
Abusive Head Trauma and Parental Participation in Pediatric Decision Making. J Clin Ethics. 2020; 31(2):121-125.
Score: 0.024
-
The Pediatrician's Moral Obligation to Counsel Directively Against Youth Tackle Football. J Clin Ethics. 2020; 31(4):331-337.
Score: 0.024
-
50 Years Ago in TheJournal ofPediatrics: Why Patients Don't Follow Medical Advice: A Study of Children on Long-Term Antistreptococcal Prophylaxis. J Pediatr. 2019 12; 215:63.
Score: 0.024
-
Delegating Decision-Making Authority To a Surrogate. Ann Thorac Surg. 2019 12; 108(6):1615-1616.
Score: 0.024
-
Ethical Issues in Newborn Sequencing Research: The Case Study of BabySeq. Pediatrics. 2019 12; 144(6).
Score: 0.024
-
Surrogate Decision Making for Children: Who Should Decide? J Pediatr. 2020 05; 220:221-226.
Score: 0.024
-
Spinal Muscular Atrophy: Past, Present, and Future. Neoreviews. 2019 08; 20(8):e437-e451.
Score: 0.023
-
50 Years Ago in TheJournal ofPediatrics: Parents of the Mentally Retarded Child: Emotionally Overwhelmed or Informationally Deprived? J Pediatr. 2019 Jun; 209:106.
Score: 0.023
-
Living Donation by Individuals with Life-Limiting Conditions. J Law Med Ethics. 2019 03; 47(1):112-122.
Score: 0.023
-
Missed Opportunities in the Preparticipation Physical Examination for High School Athletes. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2019 05; 58(5):547-554.
Score: 0.023
-
African-Americans with End Stage Renal Disease in the Early Years of Kidney Transplantation. J Natl Med Assoc. 2019 Aug; 111(4):352-362.
Score: 0.023
-
50 Years Ago in The Journal of Pediatrics: Prenatal Detection of Genetic Defects. J Pediatr. 2019 01; 204:45.
Score: 0.022
-
Better than Best (Interest Standard) in Pediatric Decision Making. J Clin Ethics. 2019; 30(3):183-195.
Score: 0.022
-
In Further Defense of "Better than Best (Interest)". J Clin Ethics. 2019; 30(3):232-239.
Score: 0.022
-
Respecting Choice in Definitions of Death. Hastings Cent Rep. 2018 Nov; 48 Suppl 4:S53-S55.
Score: 0.022
-
Public Attitudes and Knowledge About Youth Sports Participation and Concussion Risk in an Urban Area. J Natl Med Assoc. 2018 Dec; 110(6):635-643.
Score: 0.022
-
50 Years Ago in The Journal of Pediatrics: Maternal Phenylketonuria: Implications for Growth and Development. J Pediatr. 2018 10; 201:121.
Score: 0.022
-
Pediatric Decision Making Requires Both Guidance and Intervention Principles. Am J Bioeth. 2018 08; 18(8):44-46.
Score: 0.022
-
The Complexities of Ascertaining Public Preferences for Newborn Screening Policies. J Pediatr. 2018 10; 201:8-9.
Score: 0.022
-
The Role of Gender in Publication in The Journal of Pediatrics 2015-2016: Equal Reviews, Unequal Opportunities. J Pediatr. 2018 09; 200:254-260.e1.
Score: 0.022
-
Developing an ethics framework for living donor transplantation. J Med Ethics. 2018 12; 44(12):843-850.
Score: 0.022
-
Unspoken ambivalence in kinship obligation in living donation. Prog Transplant. 2018 09; 28(3):250-255.
Score: 0.022
-
It is time to revise the kidney allocation system to restore the pediatric advantage. Am J Transplant. 2018 09; 18(9):2365-2366.
Score: 0.022
-
Ethical Analysis and Policy Recommendations Regarding Domino Liver Transplantation. Transplantation. 2018 05; 102(5):803-808.
Score: 0.021
-
50 Years Ago in The Journal of Pediatrics: Variability in the Manifestations of Phenylketonuria/Transient Hyperphenylalaninemia. J Pediatr. 2018 04; 195:65.
Score: 0.021
-
Describing how children with life threatening complex chronic conditions die. J Pediatr. 2018 02; 193:1-2.
Score: 0.021
-
Prisoners as Living Donors: A Vulnerabilities Analysis. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2018 Jan; 27(1):93-108.
Score: 0.021
-
50 Years Ago in The Journal of Pediatrics: Editorial Comment: Therapeutic Orphans. J Pediatr. 2018 01; 192:59.
Score: 0.021
-
The Challenges of Incorporating Research Ethics Consultation Into Institutional Human Subjects Protections Programs. Am J Bioeth. 2018 01; 18(1):49-51.
Score: 0.021
-
Threading the Needle for the Tiniest Babies. J Pediatr. 2017 11; 190:8-9.
Score: 0.021
-
Gender Differences in the Authorship of Original Research in Pediatric Journals, 2001-2016. J Pediatr. 2017 12; 191:244-249.e1.
Score: 0.021
-
Ethical and Logistical Issues Raised by the Advanced Donation Program "Pay It Forward" Scheme. J Med Philos. 2017 Oct 01; 42(5):518-536.
Score: 0.021
-
A Historical and Current Review of Newborn Screening for Neuromuscular Disorders From Around the World: Lessons for the United States. Pediatr Neurol. 2017 Dec; 77:12-22.
Score: 0.020
-
Attitudes and Counseling Practices of Pediatricians Regarding Youth Sports Participation and Concussion Risks. J Pediatr. 2017 05; 184:19-25.
Score: 0.020
-
50 Years Ago in The Journal of Pediatrics: Conference on Treatment of Phenylketonuria. J Pediatr. 2017 01; 180:169.
Score: 0.020
-
The Best Interest Standard: Same Name but Different Roles in Pediatric Bioethics and Child Rights Frameworks. Perspect Biol Med. 2017; 60(2):186-197.
Score: 0.020
-
Kidney Donor Profile Index Does Not Accurately Predict the Graft Survival of Pediatric Deceased Donor Kidneys. Transplantation. 2016 Nov; 100(11):2471-2478.
Score: 0.019
-
50 Years Ago in TheJournal ofPediatrics: Evaluation of the Effects of Terminating the Diet in Phenylketonuria. J Pediatr. 2016 10; 177:113.
Score: 0.019
-
Attitudes of Lay Stakeholders and Transplant Professionals About Disclosure to Living Kidney Donors in Exchanges and Chains. Prog Transplant. 2016 Dec; 26(4):299-308.
Score: 0.019
-
50 Years Ago in TheJournal ofPediatrics: Legislation and Advances in Medical Knowledge-Acceleration or Inhibition? J Pediatr. 2016 08; 175:53.
Score: 0.019
-
Introducing Genetic Tests With Uncertain Implications in Living Donor Kidney Transplantation: ApoL1 as a Case Study. Prog Transplant. 2016 Sep; 26(3):203-6.
Score: 0.019
-
The 1966 Ciba Symposium on Transplantation Ethics: 50 Years Later. Transplantation. 2016 Jun; 100(6):1191-7.
Score: 0.019
-
Living Kidney Donors Who Develop Kidney Failure: Excerpts of Their Thoughts. Am J Nephrol. 2016; 43(6):389-96.
Score: 0.019
-
Theory and Practice of Pediatric Bioethics. Perspect Biol Med. 2016; 58(3):267-80.
Score: 0.018
-
To tell or not to tell: attitudes of transplant surgeons and transplant nephrologists regarding the disclosure of recipient information to living kidney donors. Clin Transplant. 2015 Dec; 29(12):1203-12.
Score: 0.018
-
Pediatric Resident Preparedness and Educational Experiences With Informed Consent. Acad Pediatr. 2016 Apr; 16(3):298-304.
Score: 0.018
-
Should Medical Errors Be Disclosed to Pediatric Patients? Pediatricians' Attitudes Toward Error Disclosure. Acad Pediatr. 2016 07; 16(5):482-488.
Score: 0.018
-
Disclosing Health and Health Behavior Information between Living Donors and Their Recipients. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015 Sep 04; 10(9):1609-16.
Score: 0.018
-
50 Years Ago in The Journal of Pediatrics: Phenylketonuria in a Negro Infant. J Pediatr. 2015 Aug; 167(2):304.
Score: 0.018
-
Living kidney donors and ESRD. Am J Kidney Dis. 2015 Jul; 66(1):23-7.
Score: 0.017
-
Ethical and policy issues in newborn screening of children for neurologic and developmental disorders. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2015 Jun; 62(3):787-98.
Score: 0.017
-
Pediatric Professionals' Attitudes about Secondary Findings in Genomic Sequencing of Children. J Pediatr. 2015 May; 166(5):1276-1282.e7.
Score: 0.017
-
Universal state newborn screening programs can reduce health disparities. JAMA Pediatr. 2015 Jan; 169(1):7-8.
Score: 0.017
-
Consent Is the Cornerstone of Ethically Valid Research: Ethical Issues in Recontacting Subjects Who Enrolled in Research as a Minor. Am J Bioeth. 2015; 15(10):61-3.
Score: 0.017
-
Adding Another Voice to the Living Donor Kidney Transplant Discussions at the CIBA Symposium of 1966. Perspect Biol Med. 2015; 58(4):379-94.
Score: 0.017
-
Outcomes after kidney donation. JAMA. 2014 Jul 02; 312(1):94.
Score: 0.016
-
The need to promote all pediatric stem cell donors' understanding and interests. Pediatrics. 2014 May; 133(5):e1356-7.
Score: 0.016
-
Relational autonomy: moving beyond the limits of isolated individualism. Pediatrics. 2014 Feb; 133 Suppl 1:S16-23.
Score: 0.016
-
When the living and the deceased cannot agree on organ donation: a survey of US organ procurement organizations (OPOs). Am J Transplant. 2014 Jan; 14(1):172-7.
Score: 0.016
-
The moral and legal need to disclose despite a certificate of confidentiality. Am J Bioeth. 2014; 14(10):51-3.
Score: 0.016
-
Teaching and assessment of ethics and professionalism: a survey of pediatric program directors. Acad Pediatr. 2013 Nov-Dec; 13(6):570-6.
Score: 0.016
-
Mandatory extended searches in all genome sequencing: "incidental findings," patient autonomy, and shared decision making. JAMA. 2013 Jul 24; 310(4):367-8.
Score: 0.015
-
Young physicians' recall about pediatric training in ethics and professionalism and its practical utility. J Pediatr. 2013 Oct; 163(4):1196-201.
Score: 0.015
-
Technical report: Ethical and policy issues in genetic testing and screening of children. Genet Med. 2013 Mar; 15(3):234-45.
Score: 0.015
-
Newborns and other children: in defense of differential attitudes and treatment. J Pediatr. 2013 Jun; 162(6):1096-9.
Score: 0.015
-
A pilot study to evaluate awareness of and attitudes about prenatal and neonatal genetic testing in postpartum African American women. J Natl Med Assoc. 2013; 105(1):85-91.
Score: 0.015
-
Predictive genetic testing of children and the role of the best interest standard. J Law Med Ethics. 2013; 41(4):899-906, Table of Contents.
Score: 0.015
-
Age should not be considered in the allocation of deceased donor kidneys. Semin Dial. 2012 Nov-Dec; 25(6):675-81.
Score: 0.015
-
50 years ago in the Journal of Pediatrics: mass screening for phenylketonuria. J Pediatr. 2012 Sep; 161(3):433.
Score: 0.014
-
50 years ago in the Journal of Pediatrics: identification of heterozygotes with phenylketonuria on basis of blood tyrosine responses. J Pediatr. 2012 Sep; 161(3):487.
Score: 0.014
-
50 years ago in the Journal of Pediatrics: comparison of serum phenylalanine levels with growth in Guthrie's inhibition assay in newborn infants. J Pediatr. 2012 Sep; 161(3):530.
Score: 0.014
-
Parents: critical stakeholders in expanding newborn screening. J Pediatr. 2012 Sep; 161(3):385-9.
Score: 0.014
-
Equal Opportunity Supplemented by Fair Innings: equity and efficiency in allocating deceased donor kidneys. Am J Transplant. 2012 Aug; 12(8):2115-24.
Score: 0.014
-
Attitudes of African-American parents about biobank participation and return of results for themselves and their children. J Med Ethics. 2012 Sep; 38(9):561-6.
Score: 0.014
-
Identification and management of sickle cell trait by young physicians. J Natl Med Assoc. 2012 May-Jun; 104(5-6):299-304.
Score: 0.014
-
Research ethics education for community-engaged research: a review and research agenda. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2012 Apr; 7(2):3-19.
Score: 0.014
-
Biobank participation and returning research results: perspectives from a deliberative engagement in South Side Chicago. Am J Med Genet A. 2012 May; 158A(5):1029-37.
Score: 0.014
-
Incidental findings of therapeutic misconception in biobank-based research. Genet Med. 2012 Jun; 14(6):611-5.
Score: 0.014
-
Different standards are not double standards: all elective surgical patients are not alike. J Clin Ethics. 2012; 23(2):118-28.
Score: 0.014
-
Newborn screening for lysosomal storage diseases: an ethical and policy analysis. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2012 Jul; 35(4):627-34.
Score: 0.014
-
A re-examination of the use of ethnicity in prenatal carrier testing. Am J Med Genet A. 2012 Jan; 158A(1):19-23.
Score: 0.014
-
Newborn screening for sickle cell disease: whose reproductive benefit? Eur J Hum Genet. 2012 May; 20(5):484-5.
Score: 0.014
-
Attitudes and beliefs of sports medicine providers to sickle cell trait screening of student athletes. Clin J Sport Med. 2011 Nov; 21(6):480-5.
Score: 0.014
-
Sickle cell trait screening in athletes: pediatricians' attitudes and concerns. Pediatrics. 2011 Sep; 128(3):477-83.
Score: 0.013
-
Ethical and policy issues raised by heterozygote carrier identification and predictive genetic testing of adolescents. Adolesc Med State Art Rev. 2011 Aug; 22(2):251-64, ix.
Score: 0.013
-
A pilot study to determine whether health care professionals perceive stigma in heterozygote carrier identification and disclosure decisions. Am J Med Genet A. 2011 Aug; 155A(8):1897-905.
Score: 0.013
-
Risk, prognosis, and unintended consequences in kidney allocation. N Engl J Med. 2011 Apr 07; 364(14):1285-7.
Score: 0.013
-
Are we adequately protecting vulnerable patients in longitudinal observational studies? J Pediatr. 2011 Jun; 158(6):1036-7; author reply 1037.
Score: 0.013
-
In defense of the American Academy of Pediatrics policy statement--children as hematopoietic stem cell donors. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2011 Apr; 56(4):520-3.
Score: 0.013
-
Parental understanding of newborn screening for cystic fibrosis after a negative sweat-test. Pediatrics. 2011 Feb; 127(2):276-83.
Score: 0.013
-
Mandatory versus voluntary consent for newborn screening? Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2010 Dec; 20(4):299-328.
Score: 0.013
-
Maternal attitudes about sickle cell trait identification in themselves and their infants. J Natl Med Assoc. 2010 Nov; 102(11):1065-72.
Score: 0.013
-
Are we ready to expand donation after cardiac death to the newborn population? J Pediatr. 2011 Jan; 158(1):6-8.
Score: 0.013
-
A pilot study to evaluate knowledge and attitudes of Illinois pediatricians toward newborn screening for sickle cell disease and cystic fibrosis. Am J Perinatol. 2011 Mar; 28(3):169-76.
Score: 0.013
-
360 Degrees of human subjects protections in community-engaged research. Sci Transl Med. 2010 Aug 18; 2(45):45cm23.
Score: 0.013
-
Reactions of pediatricians to refusals of medical treatment for minors. J Adolesc Health. 2010 Aug; 47(2):126-32.
Score: 0.012
-
Human subjects protections in community-engaged research: a research ethics framework. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2010 Mar; 5(1):5-17.
Score: 0.012
-
The challenges of collaboration for academic and community partners in a research partnership: points to consider. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2010 Mar; 5(1):19-31.
Score: 0.012
-
Nine key functions for a human subjects protection program for community-engaged research: points to consider. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2010 Mar; 5(1):33-47.
Score: 0.012
-
Good ethics requires good science: why transplant programs should not disclose misattributed parentage. Am J Transplant. 2010 Apr; 10(4):742-746.
Score: 0.012
-
What the medical excuse teaches us about the potential living donor as patient. Am J Transplant. 2010 Apr; 10(4):731-736.
Score: 0.012
-
An ethical and policy analysis of elective transplantation for metabolic conditions diagnosed by newborn screening. J Pediatr. 2010 Jan; 156(1):139-44.
Score: 0.012
-
When physicians forego the doctor-patient relationship, should they elect to self-prescribe or curbside? An empirical and ethical analysis. J Med Ethics. 2010 Jan; 36(1):19-23.
Score: 0.012
-
Forty years later: the scope of bioethics revisited. Perspect Biol Med. 2010; 53(3):452-7.
Score: 0.012
-
Maternal knowledge and attitudes about newborn screening for sickle cell disease and cystic fibrosis. Am J Med Genet A. 2009 Nov; 149A(11):2424-9.
Score: 0.012
-
The ethics of hematopoietic stem cell donation by minors. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009 Nov; 163(11):1065; author reply 1065-6.
Score: 0.012
-
A pilot study to explore knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs about sickle cell trait and disease. J Natl Med Assoc. 2009 Nov; 101(11):1163-72.
Score: 0.012
-
Ethics and professionalism in the pediatric curriculum: a survey of pediatric program directors. Pediatrics. 2009 Oct; 124(4):1143-51.
Score: 0.012
-
Hypoplastic left heart syndrome: a paradigm case for examining conscientious objection in pediatric practice. J Pediatr. 2009 Jul; 155(1):12-5.
Score: 0.012
-
Clinical and ethical considerations in managing carrier detection. Am J Public Health. 2009 Aug; 99(8):1348-9.
Score: 0.012
-
Long-term consequences of kidney donation. N Engl J Med. 2009 May 28; 360(22):2371; author reply 2372.
Score: 0.012
-
Pediatricians' attitudes toward resuscitation in children with chronic illnesses. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2009 May; 10(3):369-74.
Score: 0.011
-
Qualitative insights into how pediatric pay-for-performance programs are being designed. Acad Pediatr. 2009 May-Jun; 9(3):185-91.
Score: 0.011
-
Fragile X screening: attitudes of genetic health professionals. Am J Med Genet A. 2009 Feb 15; 149A(4):626-32.
Score: 0.011
-
Against the tide: arguments against respecting a minor's refusal of efficacious life-saving treatment. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2009; 18(3):302-15; discussion 315-22.
Score: 0.011
-
Arguments against respecting a minor's refusal of efficacious life-saving treatment redux, part II. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2009; 18(4):432-40; discussion 440-2.
Score: 0.011
-
A descriptive and moral evaluation of providing informal medical care to one's own children. J Clin Ethics. 2009; 20(4):353-61.
Score: 0.011
-
Pediatricians' attitudes about screening newborns for infectious diseases. Matern Child Health J. 2010 Mar; 14(2):174-83.
Score: 0.011
-
Pediatricians are more supportive of the human papillomavirus vaccine than the general public. South Med J. 2008 Dec; 101(12):1216-21.
Score: 0.011
-
Ethical and policy lessons to be learned from a family with inherited bone marrow failure. Am J Med Genet A. 2008 Nov 01; 146A(21):2715-8.
Score: 0.011
-
Policy considerations in designing a fragile X population screening program. Genet Med. 2008 Oct; 10(10):711-3.
Score: 0.011
-
Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis: a lesson in public health disparities. J Pediatr. 2008 Sep; 153(3):308-13.
Score: 0.011
-
Minors as living solid-organ donors. Pediatrics. 2008 Aug; 122(2):454-61.
Score: 0.011
-
Paediatricians' attitudes and practices towards HPV vaccination. Acta Paediatr. 2008 Nov; 97(11):1550-6.
Score: 0.011
-
From genetics to genomics: ethics, policy, and parental decision-making. J Pediatr Psychol. 2009 Jul; 34(6):639-47.
Score: 0.011
-
An empirical investigation of physicians' attitudes toward intrasibling kidney donation by minor twins. Transplantation. 2008 May 15; 85(9):1235-9.
Score: 0.011
-
Potential inefficiency of a proposed efficiency model for kidney allocation. Am J Kidney Dis. 2008 Apr; 51(4):545-8.
Score: 0.011
-
Ethical and policy issues in pediatric genetics. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2008 Feb 15; 148C(1):1-7.
Score: 0.011
-
Empirical data about women's attitudes toward a biobank focused on pregnancy outcomes. Am J Med Genet A. 2008 Feb 01; 146A(3):305-11.
Score: 0.011
-
Empirical data about women's attitudes towards a hypothetical pediatric biobank. Am J Med Genet A. 2008 Feb 01; 146A(3):297-304.
Score: 0.011
-
We need a registry of living kidney donors. Hastings Cent Rep. 2007 Nov-Dec; 37(6):1 p following 48.
Score: 0.010
-
Ethics of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in type 1 diabetes mellitus. JAMA. 2007 Jul 18; 298(3):285; author reply 285-6.
Score: 0.010
-
Against newborn screening for type 1 diabetes. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007 Jun; 161(6):616-7; author reply 617-8.
Score: 0.010
-
Religion, conscience, and controversial clinical practices. N Engl J Med. 2007 May 03; 356(18):1889-92; author reply 1889-92.
Score: 0.010
-
The participation of children in nontherapeutic diabetes research in the US. Nat Clin Pract Endocrinol Metab. 2007 May; 3(5):378-9.
Score: 0.010
-
Growth attenuation by commission and omission may be ethically justifiable in children with profound disabilities. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007 Apr; 161(4):418; author reply 419-20.
Score: 0.010
-
Methodology matters. Am J Public Health. 2007 Apr; 97(4):589; author reply 589-90.
Score: 0.010
-
The moral status of the newborn and its implications for medical decision making. Theor Med Bioeth. 2007; 28(5):349-55.
Score: 0.010
-
Attitudes and beliefs of pediatricians and genetic counselors regarding testing and screening for CF and G6PD: implications for policy. Am J Med Genet A. 2006 Nov 01; 140(21):2305-11.
Score: 0.010
-
Attitudes of genetic counselors towards expanding newborn screening and offering predictive genetic testing to children. Am J Med Genet A. 2006 Nov 01; 140(21):2312-9.
Score: 0.010
-
Informed consent for genetic research involving pleiotropic genes: an empirical study of ApoE research. IRB. 2006 Sep-Oct; 28(5):1-11.
Score: 0.010
-
Shared decision making in deceased-donor transplantation. Lancet. 2006 Jul 22; 368(9532):333-7.
Score: 0.009
-
Phase I research and the meaning of direct benefit. J Pediatr. 2006 Jul; 149(1 Suppl):S20-4.
Score: 0.009
-
What is wrong with the Physician Charter on Professionalism. Hastings Cent Rep. 2006 Jul-Aug; 36(4):17-9.
Score: 0.009
-
The ethical limits in expanding living donor transplantation. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2006 Jun; 16(2):151-72.
Score: 0.009
-
Does familiarity breed acceptance? The influence of policy on physicians' attitudes toward newborn screening programs. Pediatrics. 2006 May; 117(5):1477-85.
Score: 0.009
-
Newborn screening technology: proceed with caution. Pediatrics. 2006 May; 117(5):1793-9.
Score: 0.009
-
Screening for conditions that do not meet the Wilson and Jungner criteria: the case of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Am J Med Genet A. 2006 Apr 15; 140(8):914-22.
Score: 0.009
-
Ethical considerations related to pregnancy in transplant recipients. N Engl J Med. 2006 Mar 23; 354(12):1313-6.
Score: 0.009
-
Pediatric research and the federal minimal risk standard. JAMA. 2006 Feb 15; 295(7):759; author reply 759-60.
Score: 0.009
-
Implications of disclosing individual results of clinical research. JAMA. 2006 Jan 04; 295(1):37; author reply 37-8.
Score: 0.009
-
Attitudes of minority patients with end-stage renal disease regarding ABO-incompatible list-paired exchanges. Am J Transplant. 2006 Jan; 6(1):83-8.
Score: 0.009
-
Should a PVS patient be a live organ donor? Med Ethics (Burlingt Mass). 2006; 13(1):3.
Score: 0.009
-
A compounding of errors: the case of bone marrow donation between non-intimate siblings. J Clin Ethics. 2006; 17(3):220-6.
Score: 0.009
-
Heterozygote carrier testing in high schools abroad: what are the lessons for the U.S.? J Law Med Ethics. 2006; 34(4):753-64.
Score: 0.009
-
Ethics of placebos in clinical asthma trials. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006 Feb; 117(2):470; author reply 470-1.
Score: 0.009
-
Access and equity to cancer care in the USA: a review and assessment. Postgrad Med J. 2005 Nov; 81(961):674-9.
Score: 0.009
-
In defense of a single standard of research risk for all children. J Pediatr. 2005 Nov; 147(5):565-6.
Score: 0.009
-
Pediatricians' attitudes toward expanding newborn screening. Pediatrics. 2005 Oct; 116(4):e476-84.
Score: 0.009
-
The participation of minorities in published pediatric research. J Natl Med Assoc. 2005 Jun; 97(6):777-83.
Score: 0.009
-
Motivation, risk, and benefit in living organ donation: a reply to Aaron Spital. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2005; 14(2):191-4; discussion 195-8.
Score: 0.009
-
Parental attitudes and beliefs regarding the genetic testing of children. Community Genet. 2005; 8(2):94-102.
Score: 0.009
-
Do peer guidelines or editorial policies affect the reporting and discussion of race and ethnicity in pediatric research? Account Res. 2005 Jan-Mar; 12(1):17-31.
Score: 0.009
-
Lessons to be learned from the 407 process. Health Matrix Clevel. 2005; 15(2):401-21.
Score: 0.009
-
Attitudes of healthcare professionals and parents regarding genetic testing for violent traits in childhood. J Med Ethics. 2004 Dec; 30(6):580-6.
Score: 0.008
-
Should children and adolescents undergo genetic testing? Pediatr Ann. 2004 Nov; 33(11):762-9.
Score: 0.008
-
Practical and ethical challenges to paired exchange programs. Am J Transplant. 2004 Oct; 4(10):1553-4.
Score: 0.008
-
Restricting living-donor-cadaver-donor exchanges to ensure that standard blood type O wait-list candidates benefit. Transplantation. 2004 Sep 15; 78(5):641-6.
Score: 0.008
-
The need for consistency in 407 reviews. Pediatrics. 2004 Sep; 114(3):901-2; author reply 901-2.
Score: 0.008
-
Convening a 407 panel for research not otherwise approvable: "Precursors to diabetes in Japanese American youth" as a case study. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2004 Jun; 14(2):165-86.
Score: 0.008
-
Incorporating newborn screening into prenatal care. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Apr; 190(4):876-7.
Score: 0.008
-
Ethical assessment of clinical asthma trials including children subjects. Pediatrics. 2004 Jan; 113(1 Pt 1):87-94.
Score: 0.008
-
Human subject protections in genetic research. Genet Test. 2004; 8(2):209-13.
Score: 0.008
-
Certificates of confidentiality in research: rationale and usage. Genet Test. 2004; 8(2):214-20.
Score: 0.008
-
Children in medical research: balancing protection and access--has the pendulum swung too far? Perspect Biol Med. 2004; 47(4):519-36.
Score: 0.008
-
Informed consent in pediatric research. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2004; 13(4):346-58.
Score: 0.008
-
Are minority children under- or overrepresented in pediatric research? Pediatrics. 2003 Oct; 112(4):890-5.
Score: 0.008
-
Is kidney donation in the donor's best interest? Transplantation. 2003 Sep 15; 76(5):753-4.
Score: 0.008
-
Do not resuscitate orders and iatrogenic arrest during dialysis: should "No" mean "No"? Semin Dial. 2003 Sep-Oct; 16(5):395-8.
Score: 0.008
-
Parental attitudes regarding newborn screening of PKU and DMD. Am J Med Genet A. 2003 Jul 15; 120A(2):209-14.
Score: 0.008
-
Whether and why pediatric researchers report race and ethnicity. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003 Jul; 157(7):671-5.
Score: 0.008
-
Effect of family history on disclosure patterns of cystic fibrosis carrier status. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2003 May 15; 119C(1):70-7.
Score: 0.008
-
Refusals of the Determination of Death by Neurologic Criteria: A Mixed Methods Study of Physician Perspectives on Refusals Cases. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2023 08 01; 24(8):628-635.
Score: 0.008
-
Why "doctor, if this were your child, what would you do?" deserves an answer. J Clin Ethics. 2003 Spring-Summer; 14(1-2):59-62.
Score: 0.008
-
Lethal language, lethal decisions. Hastings Cent Rep. 2003 Mar-Apr; 33(2):37-41.
Score: 0.007
-
Do healthy children deserve greater protection in medical research? J Pediatr. 2003 Feb; 142(2):108-12.
Score: 0.007
-
Minimizing risks: the ethics of predictive diabetes mellitus screening research in newborns. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003 Jan; 157(1):89-95.
Score: 0.007
-
Professional and personal attitudes about access and confidentiality in the genetic testing of children: a pilot study. Genet Test. 2003; 7(2):123-30.
Score: 0.007
-
Responding to the challenge of the children's health act: an introduction to children in research. Theor Med Bioeth. 2003; 24(2):101-6.
Score: 0.007
-
The ethics of type 1 diabetes prediction and prevention research. Theor Med Bioeth. 2003; 24(2):177-97.
Score: 0.007
-
Minority children in pediatric research. Am J Law Med. 2003; 29(2-3):319-36.
Score: 0.007
-
Adolescent autonomy in health care? APA Newsl Philos Med. 2003; 2(2):193-200.
Score: 0.007
-
Race in the Reading: A Study of Problematic Uses of Race and Ethnicity in a Prominent Pediatrics Textbook. Acad Med. 2022 10 01; 97(10):1521-1527.
Score: 0.007
-
Predictive genetic testing for conditions that present in childhood. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2002 Sep; 12(3):225-44.
Score: 0.007
-
Should all living donors be treated equally? Transplantation. 2002 Aug 15; 74(3):418-21; discussion 421-2.
Score: 0.007
-
The Journal of Pediatrics Turns 90! A Perspective on Progress, Opportunities, and Challenges. J Pediatr. 2022 07; 246:235-241.
Score: 0.007
-
Protecting research subjects. N Engl J Med. 2002 Jun 27; 346(26):2093-5; author reply 2093-5.
Score: 0.007
-
An Ethical Analysis of Newborn Congenital Cytomegalovirus Screening. Pediatrics. 2022 06 01; 149(6).
Score: 0.007
-
Are doctors altruistic? J Med Ethics. 2002 Apr; 28(2):68-9; discussion 74-6.
Score: 0.007
-
Revise the Uniform Determination of Death Act to Align the Law With Practice Through Neurorespiratory Criteria. Neurology. 2022 03 29; 98(13):532-536.
Score: 0.007
-
Do genetic relationships create moral obligations in organ transplantation? Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2002; 11(2):153-9.
Score: 0.007
-
In defense of the Hopkins Lead Abatement Studies. J Law Med Ethics. 2002; 30(1):50-7.
Score: 0.007
-
Media appeals for directed altruistic living liver donations: lessons from Camilo Sandoval Ewen. Perspect Biol Med. 2002; 45(3):329-37.
Score: 0.007
-
Patient autonomy: imperfect, insufficient, but still quite necessary. J Clin Ethics. 2002; 13(1):57-62.
Score: 0.007
-
Solid organ donation between strangers. J Law Med Ethics. 2002; 30(3):440-5.
Score: 0.007
-
All donations should not be treated equally: a response to Jeffrey Kahn's commentary. J Law Med Ethics. 2002; 30(3):448-51.
Score: 0.007
-
(Women and) children first: applicable to lifeboats? Applicable to human experimentation? J Health Care Law Policy. 2002; 6(1):14-33.
Score: 0.007
-
The ethics of preadoption genetic testing. Am J Med Genet. 2001 Dec 01; 104(3):214-20.
Score: 0.007
-
Correspondence on "Exploring the motivations of research participants who chose not to learn medically actionable secondary findings about themselves" by Schupmann et al. Genet Med. 2022 02; 24(2):499-500.
Score: 0.007
-
Primum non nocere: avoiding harm to vulnerable wait list candidates in an indirect kidney exchange. Transplantation. 2001 Aug 27; 72(4):648-54.
Score: 0.007
-
Ethical issues in pediatric trials. Am Heart J. 2001 Aug; 142(2):233-6.
Score: 0.007
-
First World Consensus Conference on pancreas transplantation: Part II - recommendations. Am J Transplant. 2021 09; 21 Suppl 3:17-59.
Score: 0.007
-
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in The Journal of Pediatrics. J Pediatr. 2021 09; 236:4.
Score: 0.007
-
Attitudes and practices in postmortem organ procurement. JAMA. 2001 Apr 18; 285(15):1958; author reply 1959-60.
Score: 0.007
-
Options for increasing the supply of living organ donors. JAMA. 2001 Mar 21; 285(11):1440-1.
Score: 0.007
-
SARS-CoV-2 vaccine testing and trials in the pediatric population: biologic, ethical, research, and implementation challenges. Pediatr Res. 2021 11; 90(5):966-970.
Score: 0.007
-
Genetic exceptionalism vs. paradigm shift: lessons from HIV. J Law Med Ethics. 2001; 29(2):141-8.
Score: 0.006
-
Ethical and policy issues in genetic testing. Pancreatology. 2001; 1(6):576-80.
Score: 0.006
-
Pediatric Intensivist and Pediatric Neurologist Perspectives and Practices on Death by Neurologic Criteria. J Clin Ethics. 2021; 32(3):195-205.
Score: 0.006
-
Ethical issues in genetic testing of children. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2000 Sep; 154(9):873-9.
Score: 0.006
-
Genetic testing of adolescents: is it in their best interest? Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2000 Aug; 154(8):850-2.
Score: 0.006
-
Reopening Schools Safely: The Case for Collaboration, Constructive Disruption of Pre-Coronavirus 2019 Expectations, and Creative Solutions. J Pediatr. 2020 08; 223:183-185.
Score: 0.006
-
Donating a second kidney: a tale of family and ethics. Semin Dial. 2000 May-Jun; 13(3):201-3.
Score: 0.006
-
Health Care Surrogacy Laws Do Not Adequately Address the Needs of Minors. Hastings Cent Rep. 2020 Mar; 50(2):16-18.
Score: 0.006
-
Patient confidentiality and the surrogate's right to know. J Law Med Ethics. 2000; 28(2):137-43.
Score: 0.006
-
Association of Transplant Center With Survival Benefit Among Adults Undergoing Heart Transplant in the United States. JAMA. 2019 11 12; 322(18):1789-1798.
Score: 0.006
-
Pediatric bioethics: reintroducing the parents. Responsive Community. 1999; 9(3):40-7.
Score: 0.006
-
Protect NIH's DNA advisory committee. Science. 2018 10 26; 362(6413):409-410.
Score: 0.006
-
Paired exchanges should be part of the solution to ABO incompatibility in living donor kidney transplantation. Transplantation. 1998 Aug 15; 66(3):406-7.
Score: 0.005
-
Impact of the kidney allocation system on young pediatric recipients. Clin Transplant. 2018 04; 32(4):e13223.
Score: 0.005
-
Should doctors reconstruct the vaginal introitus of adolescent girls to mimic the virginal state? Surgery is not what it seems. BMJ. 1998 Feb 07; 316(7129):462.
Score: 0.005
-
Health care decisionmaking by children. Is it in their best interest? Hastings Cent Rep. 1997 Nov-Dec; 27(6):41-5.
Score: 0.005
-
Consent for clinical research. N Engl J Med. 1997 Jul 24; 337(4):282.
Score: 0.005
-
Advantages and disadvantages of neonatal circumcision. JAMA. 1997 Jul 16; 278(3):201-2; author reply 203.
Score: 0.005
-
Religious exemptions to the immunization statutes: balancing public health and religious freedom. J Law Med Ethics. 1997 Summer-Fall; 25(2-3):202-9, 83.
Score: 0.005
-
Overriding a patient's refusal of treatment after an iatrogenic complication. N Engl J Med. 1997 Jun 26; 336(26):1908-10.
Score: 0.005
-
Ethics of a paired-kidney-exchange program. N Engl J Med. 1997 Jun 12; 336(24):1752-5.
Score: 0.005
-
Children as research subjects: a proposal to revise the current federal regulations using a moral framework. Stanford Law Pol Rev. 1997; 8(1):159-76.
Score: 0.005
-
Adolescent sexuality and public policy: an unrepentant liberal approach. Politics Life Sci. 1996 Sep; 15(2):323-8.
Score: 0.005
-
Disclosing misattributed paternity. Bioethics. 1996 Apr; 10(2):114-30.
Score: 0.005
-
Adolescent sexuality and public policy: a liberal response. Politics Life Sci. 1996 Mar; 15(1):13-21.
Score: 0.005
-
Age and equity in liver transplantation: An organ allocation model. Liver Transpl. 2015 Oct; 21(10):1241-9.
Score: 0.004
-
Racial disparities in reaching the renal transplant waitlist: is geography as important as race? Clin Transplant. 2015 Jun; 29(6):531-8.
Score: 0.004
-
Reporting incidental findings in genomic scale clinical sequencing--a clinical laboratory perspective: a report of the Association for Molecular Pathology. J Mol Diagn. 2015 Mar; 17(2):107-17.
Score: 0.004
-
Immunisation against chickenpox. BMJ. 1995 Jan 07; 310(6971):2-3.
Score: 0.004
-
Arguments against health care autonomy for minors. Bioethics Forum. 1995; 11(4):22-6.
Score: 0.004
-
Justice for children: the child as organ donor. Bioethics. 1994 Apr; 8(2):105-26.
Score: 0.004
-
Addressing the ethical challenges in genetic testing and sequencing of children. Am J Bioeth. 2014; 14(3):3-9.
Score: 0.004
-
Communicating with parents about immunization safety: messages for pediatricians in the IOM report "the childhood immunization schedule and safety: stakeholder concerns, scientific evidence, and future studies". Acad Pediatr. 2013 Sep-Oct; 13(5):387-9.
Score: 0.004
-
Life support for patients with cervical-level quadriplegia. N Engl J Med. 1993 Aug 26; 329(9):663; author reply 664.
Score: 0.004
-
Recommendations for returning genomic incidental findings? We need to talk! Genet Med. 2013 Nov; 15(11):854-9.
Score: 0.004
-
The OHRP and SUPPORT. N Engl J Med. 2013 Jun 20; 368(25):e36.
Score: 0.004
-
A K-nearest neighbors survival probability prediction method. Stat Med. 2013 May 30; 32(12):2062-9.
Score: 0.004
-
Moral grounding for the participation of children as organ donors. J Law Med Ethics. 1993; 21(2):251-7.
Score: 0.004
-
Neighborhood poverty, racial composition and renal transplant waitlist. Am J Transplant. 2010 Aug; 10(8):1912-7.
Score: 0.003
-
Saving lives is more important than abstract moral concerns: financial incentives should be used to increase organ donation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 Oct; 88(4):1053-61.
Score: 0.003
-
Population screening for genetic disorders in the 21st century: evidence, economics, and ethics. Public Health Genomics. 2010; 13(2):106-15.
Score: 0.003
-
American academy of pediatrics policy statements on bioethics: summaries and commentaries: part 3. Pediatr Rev. 2008 May; 29(5):e28-34.
Score: 0.003
-
American Academy of Pediatrics policy statements on bioethics: summaries and commentaries: part 2. Pediatr Rev. 2008 Mar; 29(3):e15-22.
Score: 0.003
-
American Academy of Pediatrics policy statements on bioethics: summaries and commentaries: part 1. Pediatr Rev. 2008 Jan; 29(1):e1-8.
Score: 0.003
-
Ethical issues in haemophilia. Haemophilia. 2006 Jul; 12 Suppl 3:30-5.
Score: 0.002
-
Reproduction and transplantation: report on the AST Consensus Conference on Reproductive Issues and Transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2005 Jul; 5(7):1592-9.
Score: 0.002
-
Ethical issues in identifying and recruiting participants for familial genetic research. Am J Med Genet A. 2004 Nov 01; 130A(4):424-31.
Score: 0.002
-
Disclosing the diagnosis of HIV in pediatrics. J Clin Ethics. 2001; 12(2):150-7.
Score: 0.002