Lainie Ross to Risk Assessment
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Lainie Ross has written about Risk Assessment.
Connection Strength
2.049
-
Developing an ethics framework for living donor transplantation. J Med Ethics. 2018 12; 44(12):843-850.
Score: 0.380
-
In defense of a single standard of research risk for all children. J Pediatr. 2005 Nov; 147(5):565-6.
Score: 0.158
-
Lessons to be learned from the 407 process. Health Matrix Clevel. 2005; 15(2):401-21.
Score: 0.149
-
Do healthy children deserve greater protection in medical research? J Pediatr. 2003 Feb; 142(2):108-12.
Score: 0.131
-
Predictive genetic testing for conditions that present in childhood. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2002 Sep; 12(3):225-44.
Score: 0.127
-
Missed Opportunities in the Preparticipation Physical Examination for High School Athletes. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2019 05; 58(5):547-554.
Score: 0.099
-
Ethical Analysis and Policy Recommendations Regarding Domino Liver Transplantation. Transplantation. 2018 05; 102(5):803-808.
Score: 0.094
-
Disclosing misattributed paternity. Bioethics. 1996 Apr; 10(2):114-30.
Score: 0.081
-
Justice for children: the child as organ donor. Bioethics. 1994 Apr; 8(2):105-26.
Score: 0.071
-
Human subjects protections in community-engaged research: a research ethics framework. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2010 Mar; 5(1):5-17.
Score: 0.053
-
How different conceptions of risk are used in the organ market debate. Am J Transplant. 2010 Apr; 10(4):931-937.
Score: 0.053
-
Qualitative insights into how pediatric pay-for-performance programs are being designed. Acad Pediatr. 2009 May-Jun; 9(3):185-91.
Score: 0.050
-
Minors as living solid-organ donors. Pediatrics. 2008 Aug; 122(2):454-61.
Score: 0.048
-
From genetics to genomics: ethics, policy, and parental decision-making. J Pediatr Psychol. 2009 Jul; 34(6):639-47.
Score: 0.048
-
Phase I research and the meaning of direct benefit. J Pediatr. 2006 Jul; 149(1 Suppl):S20-4.
Score: 0.041
-
The ethical limits in expanding living donor transplantation. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2006 Jun; 16(2):151-72.
Score: 0.041
-
Pediatric research and the federal minimal risk standard. JAMA. 2006 Feb 15; 295(7):759; author reply 759-60.
Score: 0.040
-
Ethics of placebos in clinical asthma trials. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006 Feb; 117(2):470; author reply 470-1.
Score: 0.040
-
Convening a 407 panel for research not otherwise approvable: "Precursors to diabetes in Japanese American youth" as a case study. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2004 Jun; 14(2):165-86.
Score: 0.036
-
Responding to the challenge of the children's health act: an introduction to children in research. Theor Med Bioeth. 2003; 24(2):101-6.
Score: 0.032
-
The ethics of type 1 diabetes prediction and prevention research. Theor Med Bioeth. 2003; 24(2):177-97.
Score: 0.032
-
Minority children in pediatric research. Am J Law Med. 2003; 29(2-3):319-36.
Score: 0.032
-
Should all living donors be treated equally? Transplantation. 2002 Aug 15; 74(3):418-21; discussion 421-2.
Score: 0.032
-
In defense of the Hopkins Lead Abatement Studies. J Law Med Ethics. 2002; 30(1):50-7.
Score: 0.030
-
SARS-CoV-2 vaccine testing and trials in the pediatric population: biologic, ethical, research, and implementation challenges. Pediatr Res. 2021 11; 90(5):966-970.
Score: 0.029
-
Religious exemptions to the immunization statutes: balancing public health and religious freedom. J Law Med Ethics. 1997 Summer-Fall; 25(2-3):202-9, 83.
Score: 0.022
-
Ethics of a paired-kidney-exchange program. N Engl J Med. 1997 Jun 12; 336(24):1752-5.
Score: 0.022
-
Children as research subjects: a proposal to revise the current federal regulations using a moral framework. Stanford Law Pol Rev. 1997; 8(1):159-76.
Score: 0.021
-
Age and equity in liver transplantation: An organ allocation model. Liver Transpl. 2015 Oct; 21(10):1241-9.
Score: 0.020
-
Arguments against health care autonomy for minors. Bioethics Forum. 1995; 11(4):22-6.
Score: 0.019
-
Moral grounding for the participation of children as organ donors. J Law Med Ethics. 1993; 21(2):251-7.
Score: 0.016