The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Lainie Ross to Genetic Testing

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Lainie Ross has written about Genetic Testing.
Connection Strength

7.835
  1. Ethical Issues in Newborn Sequencing Research: The Case Study of BabySeq. Pediatrics. 2019 12; 144(6).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.532
  2. Introducing Genetic Tests With Uncertain Implications in Living Donor Kidney Transplantation: ApoL1 as a Case Study. Prog Transplant. 2016 Sep; 26(3):203-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.420
  3. Ethical and policy issues in newborn screening of children for neurologic and developmental disorders. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2015 Jun; 62(3):787-98.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.387
  4. Mandatory extended searches in all genome sequencing: "incidental findings," patient autonomy, and shared decision making. JAMA. 2013 Jul 24; 310(4):367-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.344
  5. Technical report: Ethical and policy issues in genetic testing and screening of children. Genet Med. 2013 Mar; 15(3):234-45.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.334
  6. A pilot study to evaluate awareness of and attitudes about prenatal and neonatal genetic testing in postpartum African American women. J Natl Med Assoc. 2013; 105(1):85-91.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.331
  7. Predictive genetic testing of children and the role of the best interest standard. J Law Med Ethics. 2013; 41(4):899-906, Table of Contents.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.331
  8. A re-examination of the use of ethnicity in prenatal carrier testing. Am J Med Genet A. 2012 Jan; 158A(1):19-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.306
  9. Ethical and policy issues raised by heterozygote carrier identification and predictive genetic testing of adolescents. Adolesc Med State Art Rev. 2011 Aug; 22(2):251-64, ix.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.300
  10. Clinical and ethical considerations in managing carrier detection. Am J Public Health. 2009 Aug; 99(8):1348-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.259
  11. Fragile X screening: attitudes of genetic health professionals. Am J Med Genet A. 2009 Feb 15; 149A(4):626-32.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.253
  12. Policy considerations in designing a fragile X population screening program. Genet Med. 2008 Oct; 10(10):711-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.246
  13. From genetics to genomics: ethics, policy, and parental decision-making. J Pediatr Psychol. 2009 Jul; 34(6):639-47.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.243
  14. Ethical and policy issues in pediatric genetics. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2008 Feb 15; 148C(1):1-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.236
  15. Methodology matters. Am J Public Health. 2007 Apr; 97(4):589; author reply 589-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.221
  16. Attitudes of genetic counselors towards expanding newborn screening and offering predictive genetic testing to children. Am J Med Genet A. 2006 Nov 01; 140(21):2312-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.216
  17. Screening for conditions that do not meet the Wilson and Jungner criteria: the case of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Am J Med Genet A. 2006 Apr 15; 140(8):914-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.208
  18. Heterozygote carrier testing in high schools abroad: what are the lessons for the U.S.? J Law Med Ethics. 2006; 34(4):753-64.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.204
  19. Parental attitudes and beliefs regarding the genetic testing of children. Community Genet. 2005; 8(2):94-102.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.190
  20. Attitudes of healthcare professionals and parents regarding genetic testing for violent traits in childhood. J Med Ethics. 2004 Dec; 30(6):580-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.189
  21. Should children and adolescents undergo genetic testing? Pediatr Ann. 2004 Nov; 33(11):762-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.188
  22. Parental attitudes regarding newborn screening of PKU and DMD. Am J Med Genet A. 2003 Jul 15; 120A(2):209-14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.172
  23. Diagnosis, treatment and disclosure: A qualitative exploration of participant challenges in a Monogenic Diabetes Registry. Genet Med. 2023 04; 25(4):100019.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.166
  24. Professional and personal attitudes about access and confidentiality in the genetic testing of children: a pilot study. Genet Test. 2003; 7(2):123-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.165
  25. Predictive genetic testing for conditions that present in childhood. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2002 Sep; 12(3):225-44.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.162
  26. The ethics of preadoption genetic testing. Am J Med Genet. 2001 Dec 01; 104(3):214-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.153
  27. Genetic exceptionalism vs. paradigm shift: lessons from HIV. J Law Med Ethics. 2001; 29(2):141-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.144
  28. Ethical and policy issues in genetic testing. Pancreatology. 2001; 1(6):576-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.144
  29. Ethical issues in genetic testing of children. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2000 Sep; 154(9):873-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.141
  30. Genetic testing of adolescents: is it in their best interest? Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2000 Aug; 154(8):850-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.140
  31. Addressing the ethical challenges in genetic testing and sequencing of children. Am J Bioeth. 2014; 14(3):3-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.089
  32. Recommendations for returning genomic incidental findings? We need to talk! Genet Med. 2013 Nov; 15(11):854-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.086
  33. A pilot study to evaluate knowledge and attitudes of Illinois pediatricians toward newborn screening for sickle cell disease and cystic fibrosis. Am J Perinatol. 2011 Mar; 28(3):169-76.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.070
  34. Population screening for genetic disorders in the 21st century: evidence, economics, and ethics. Public Health Genomics. 2010; 13(2):106-15.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.065
  35. Informed consent for genetic research involving pleiotropic genes: an empirical study of ApoE research. IRB. 2006 Sep-Oct; 28(5):1-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  36. Ethical issues in identifying and recruiting participants for familial genetic research. Am J Med Genet A. 2004 Nov 01; 130A(4):424-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  37. Correspondence on "Exploring the motivations of research participants who chose not to learn medically actionable secondary findings about themselves" by Schupmann et al. Genet Med. 2022 02; 24(2):499-500.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  38. Consent for clinical research. N Engl J Med. 1997 Jul 24; 337(4):282.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  39. Disclosing misattributed paternity. Bioethics. 1996 Apr; 10(2):114-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  40. Ethical issues in haemophilia. Haemophilia. 2006 Jul; 12 Suppl 3:30-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.