The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

James A. Shapiro to Evolution, Molecular

This is a "connection" page, showing publications James A. Shapiro has written about Evolution, Molecular.
Connection Strength

2.081
  1. No genome is an island: toward a 21st century agenda for evolution. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2019 07; 1447(1):21-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.447
  2. Rethinking the (im)possible in evolution. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2013 Apr; 111(2-3):92-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.285
  3. Revisiting the central dogma in the 21st century. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009 Oct; 1178:6-28.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.232
  4. A 21st century view of evolution: genome system architecture, repetitive DNA, and natural genetic engineering. Gene. 2005 Jan 17; 345(1):91-100.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.167
  5. How repeated retroelements format genome function. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2005; 110(1-4):108-16.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.167
  6. Genome organization and reorganization in evolution: formatting for computation and function. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2002 Dec; 981:111-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.144
  7. Repetitive DNA, genome system architecture and genome reorganization. Res Microbiol. 2002 Sep; 153(7):447-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.142
  8. What we have learned about evolutionary genome change in the past 7 decades. Biosystems. 2022 Jun; 215-216:104669.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.138
  9. Genome system architecture and natural genetic engineering in evolution. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1999 May 18; 870:23-35.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.113
  10. Transposable elements as the key to a 21st century view of evolution. Genetica. 1999; 107(1-3):171-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.110
  11. Constraint and opportunity in genome innovation. RNA Biol. 2014; 11(3):186-96.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.078
  12. Letting Escherichia coli teach me about genome engineering. Genetics. 2009 Dec; 183(4):1205-14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.059
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.