The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Abraham Dachman to Humans

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Abraham Dachman has written about Humans.
Connection Strength

0.753
  1. To Wait or to Act: How CT Colonography Can Improve Management of Colorectal Polyps. Radiology. 2024 01; 310(1):e232975.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  2. Editorial Comment: Avoiding Pitfalls in the Diagnosis of Intestinal Ischemia. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2023 Feb; 220(2):185.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  3. A Clinically Optimal Protocol for the Imaging of Enteric Tubes: On the Basis of Radiologist Interpreted Diagnostic Utility and Radiation Dose Reduction. Acad Radiol. 2022 12; 29(12):e279-e288.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  4. Lung Base Findings of Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) on Abdominal CT in Patients With Predominant Gastrointestinal Symptoms. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020 Sep; 215(3):607-609.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  5. Pearls and Pitfalls of Interpretation in CT Colonography. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2020 May; 71(2):140-148.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  6. Structured reporting and quality control in CT colonography. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2018 03; 43(3):566-573.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  7. Errors in CT colonography. Abdom Imaging. 2015 Oct; 40(7):2099-111.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  8. CT colonography with computer-aided detection: recognizing the causes of false-positive reader results. Radiographics. 2014 Nov-Dec; 34(7):1885-905.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  9. The challenges of CT colonography reimbursement. J Am Coll Radiol. 2013 Dec; 10(12):937-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  10. BMI-based radiation dose reduction in CT colonography. Acad Radiol. 2013 Apr; 20(4):486-92.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  11. Improving the role of CT in diagnosing perforated appendicitis: can appendiceal air help? Acad Radiol. 2012 Oct; 19(10):1173-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  12. Interpretation of CT colonographic images: should we rely on nonradiologists? Radiology. 2012 Sep; 264(3):624-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  13. Pancreas size and volume on computed tomography in normal adults. Pancreas. 2012 May; 41(4):589-95.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  14. CAD-associated reader error in CT colonography. Acad Radiol. 2012 Jul; 19(7):801-10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  15. Evaluation of CT as a predictor for kidney and renal artery mobility. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2012 Jan-Feb; 18(1):27-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  16. Effect of computer-aided detection for CT colonography in a multireader, multicase trial. Radiology. 2010 Sep; 256(3):827-35.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  17. CT colonography: advanced computer-aided detection scheme utilizing MTANNs for detection of "missed" polyps in a multicenter clinical trial. Med Phys. 2010 Jan; 37(1):12-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  18. Comparison of polyp size and volume at CT colonography: implications for follow-up CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Dec; 193(6):1561-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  19. Comparison of optical colonoscopy and CT colonography for polyp detection. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Nov; 193(5):1289-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  20. Bias, underestimation of risk, and loss of statistical power in patient-level analyses of lesion detection. Eur Radiol. 2010 Mar; 20(3):584-94.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  21. Comparison of 2D and 3D views for evaluation of flat lesions in CT colonography. Acad Radiol. 2010 Jan; 17(1):39-47.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  22. Flat lesions in CT colonography. Abdom Imaging. 2010 Oct; 35(5):578-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  23. Formative evaluation of standardized training for CT colonographic image interpretation by novice readers. Radiology. 2008 Oct; 249(1):167-77.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  24. Economic impact of extracolonic findings at computed tomographic colonography. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2008 Jul-Aug; 32(4):497-503.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  25. Quality of CT colonography-related web sites for consumers. J Am Coll Radiol. 2008 Apr; 5(4):593-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  26. CT colonography: false-negative interpretations. Radiology. 2007 Jul; 244(1):165-73.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  27. Multidetector row CT of small bowel obstruction. Radiol Clin North Am. 2007 May; 45(3):499-512, viii.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  28. CT colonography: visualization methods, interpretation, and pitfalls. Radiol Clin North Am. 2007 Mar; 45(2):347-59.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  29. Comparison of routine and unprepped CT colonography augmented by low fiber diet and stool tagging: a pilot study. Abdom Imaging. 2007 Jan-Feb; 32(1):96-104.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  30. Advice for optimizing colonic distention and minimizing risk of perforation during CT colonography. Radiology. 2006 May; 239(2):317-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  31. Cecal mobility: a potential pitfall of CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 Apr; 186(4):1086-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  32. Pericardial varices secondary to portal hypertension demonstrated by CT. J Thorac Imaging. 2006 Mar; 21(1):69-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  33. Characterization of normal ileocecal valve density on CT colonography. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2006 Jan-Feb; 30(1):58-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  34. CAD techniques, challenges, and controversies in computed tomographic colonography. Abdom Imaging. 2005 Jan-Feb; 30(1):26-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  35. The effect of reconstruction algorithm on conspicuity of polyps in CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004 Nov; 183(5):1349-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  36. Computer-aided diagnosis for CT colonography. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2004 Oct; 25(5):419-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  37. What's new in ACS Surgery: principles and practice. Bull Am Coll Surg. 2004 Apr; 89(4):60-1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  38. Quality and consistency in CT colonography and research reporting. Radiology. 2004 Feb; 230(2):319-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  39. CT Colonography Reporting and Data System (C-RADS): Version 2023 Update. Radiology. 2024 01; 310(1):e232007.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  40. Virtual colonoscopy: past, present, and future. Radiol Clin North Am. 2003 Mar; 41(2):377-93.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  41. Computed tomography colonography and colon cancer screening. Semin Roentgenol. 2003 Jan; 38(1):54-64.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  42. Radiologic imaging in gastroenterology. Introduction. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2002 Sep; 31(3):xi-xii.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  43. Virtual colonoscopy. Potential clinical applications of a new technique. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2002 Sep; 31(3):747-57.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  44. Automated knowledge-guided segmentation of colonic walls for computerized detection of polyps in CT colonography. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2002 Jul-Aug; 26(4):493-504.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  45. Diagnostic performance of virtual colonoscopy. Abdom Imaging. 2002 May-Jun; 27(3):260-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  46. Computerized detection of colonic polyps at CT colonography on the basis of volumetric features: pilot study. Radiology. 2002 Feb; 222(2):327-36.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  47. Automated segmentation of colonic walls for computerized detection of polyps in CT colonography. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2001 Jul-Aug; 25(4):629-38.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  48. Virtual colonoscopy: a novel imaging modality for colorectal cancer. Curr Oncol Rep. 2001 Mar; 3(2):88-93.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  49. Role of chest CT in the follow-up of ovarian adenocarcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001 Mar; 176(3):701-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  50. Portal and mesenteric venous calcification in patients with advanced cirrhosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001 Feb; 176(2):489-92.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  51. Tumor size on computed tomography scans: is one measurement enough? Cancer. 2001 Feb 01; 91(3):555-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  52. Comparative viewing modalities for CT cystography. Abdom Imaging. 2001 Jan-Feb; 26(1):92-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  53. Collateral pathways in superior vena caval obstruction as seen on CT. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2001 Jan-Feb; 25(1):1-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  54. CT in neurofibromatosis type I. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000 Dec; 175(6):1748.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  55. Use of Screening CT Colonography by Age and Race: A Study of Potential Access Barriers Related to Medicare Noncoverage Based on Data From the ACR's National CT Colonography Registry. J Am Coll Radiol. 2021 Jan; 18(1 Pt A):19-26.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  56. CT colonography's role in the COVID-19 pandemic: a safe(r), socially distanced total colon examination. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021 02; 46(2):486-490.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  57. CT colonography: the next colon screening examination? Radiology. 2000 Aug; 216(2):331-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  58. Systemic to pulmonary venous shunt in superior vena cava occlusion. J Thorac Imaging. 2000 Jul; 15(3):208-10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  59. CT diagnosis of reversible liver transplant ischemia. Clin Radiol. 1999 Nov; 54(11):776-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  60. Abnormal Pouchogram Predicts Pouch Failure Even in Asymptomatic Patients. Dis Colon Rectum. 2019 04; 62(4):463-469.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  61. CT findings after laparoscopic repair of ventral hernia. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999 Feb; 172(2):389-92.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  62. CT colonography with three-dimensional problem solving for detection of colonic polyps. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998 Oct; 171(4):989-95.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  63. A biopsy compression device for use in cross-sectional or fluoroscopic imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998 Sep; 171(3):703-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  64. Imaging of pancreatic transplantation using portal venous and enteric exocrine drainage. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998 Jul; 171(1):157-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  65. Helical CT examination of potential kidney donors. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998 Jul; 171(1):193-200.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  66. CT imaging in adults with neurofibromatosis-1: frequent asymptomatic plexiform lesions. Neurology. 1998 Jun; 50(6):1755-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  67. Long-term effect of low frequency stimulation of STN on dysphagia, freezing of gait and other motor symptoms in PD. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2018 09; 89(9):989-994.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  68. Primary non-Hodgkin's splenic lymphoma. Clin Radiol. 1998 Feb; 53(2):137-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  69. Missed Acute Appendicitis on Multidetector Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Legal Ramifications, Challenges, and Avoidance Strategies. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2017 Sep - Oct; 46(5):360-364.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  70. The Added Value of the CT Colonography Reporting and Data System. J Am Coll Radiol. 2016 Aug; 13(8):931-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  71. What are the indications for use of water-soluble contrast agent enemas in colon distension? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996 Apr; 166(4):988.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  72. New contraindication to intravascular iodinated contrast material. Radiology. 1995 Nov; 197(2):545.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  73. CT findings of regression in intraabdominal desmoplastic small-cell tumor. Clin Imaging. 1995 Oct-Dec; 19(4):244-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  74. CT colonography for the detection of nonpolypoid adenomas: sensitivity assessed with restricted national CT colonography trial criteria. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Dec; 203(6):W614-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  75. How effective is enteroclysis in detecting the source of occult bleeding when an upper and lower endoscopy are negative? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994 Nov; 163(5):1261-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  76. Colorectal carcinoma in young patients: CT detection of an atypical pattern of recurrence. Abdom Imaging. 1994 Sep-Oct; 19(5):441-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  77. Hodgkin's disease of the gastrointestinal tract. Clin Radiol. 1994 Mar; 49(3):166-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  78. The radiologic evaluation of acute abdominal pain of intestinal origin. A clinical approach. Med Clin North Am. 1993 Sep; 77(5):939-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  79. Suspected extracolonic neoplasms detected on CT colonography: literature review and possible outcomes. Acad Radiol. 2013 Jun; 20(6):667-74.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  80. Ectopic pancreas presenting with pancreatitis and a mesenteric mass. J Pediatr Surg. 2013 Jan; 48(1):e29-32.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  81. Calcified intrahepatic portal vein thrombus: distinction from intrahepatic choledocholithiasis. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1992 Nov-Dec; 16(6):977-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  82. The National CT Colonography Trial: assessment of accuracy in participants 65 years of age and older. Radiology. 2012 May; 263(2):401-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  83. Radiology of the esophagus. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 1991 Dec; 20(4):635-58.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  84. National CT colonography trial (ACRIN 6664): comparison of three full-laxative bowel preparations in more than 2500 average-risk patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 May; 196(5):1076-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  85. ACRIN CT colonography trial: does reader's preference for primary two-dimensional versus primary three-dimensional interpretation affect performance? Radiology. 2011 May; 259(2):435-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  86. Can radiologist training and testing ensure high performance in CT colonography? Lessons From the National CT Colonography Trial. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Jul; 195(1):117-25.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  87. ACR Colon Cancer Committee white paper: status of CT colonography 2009. J Am Coll Radiol. 2009 Nov; 6(11):756-772.e4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  88. CT colonography polyp matching: differences between experienced readers. Eur Radiol. 2009 Jul; 19(7):1723-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  89. Cronkhite-Canada syndrome: radiologic features. Gastrointest Radiol. 1989; 14(4):285-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  90. Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers. N Engl J Med. 2008 Sep 18; 359(12):1207-17.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  91. Colorectal hemangioma: radiologic findings. Radiology. 1988 Apr; 167(1):31-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  92. Mixture of expert 3D massive-training ANNs for reduction of multiple types of false positives in CAD for detection of polyps in CT colonography. Med Phys. 2008 Feb; 35(2):694-703.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  93. Lateral pharyngeal outpouchings: a comparison of dysphagic and asymptomatic patients. Dysphagia. 1988; 2(3):156-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  94. Computed tomographic colonography: clinical value. Abdom Imaging. 2007 Sep-Oct; 32(5):541-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  95. Hepatoblastoma: radiologic-pathologic correlation in 50 cases. Radiology. 1987 Jul; 164(1):15-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  96. Nodular regenerative hyperplasia of the liver: clinical and radiologic observations. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1987 Apr; 148(4):717-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  97. Tumors of the small intestine with little or no malignant predisposition: a review of the literature and report of 56 cases. Gastrointest Radiol. 1987; 12(3):231-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  98. Massive-training artificial neural network (MTANN) for reduction of false positives in computer-aided detection of polyps: Suppression of rectal tubes. Med Phys. 2006 Oct; 33(10):3814-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  99. Computed tomography appearance of the Lapra-Ty and Weck hem-o-lok clips in patients who recently underwent laparoscopic urologic surgery. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2006 Sep-Oct; 30(5):784-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  100. Nonparasitic splenic cysts: a report of 52 cases with radiologic-pathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1986 Sep; 147(3):537-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  101. The solitary colonic polyp: radiologic-histologic differentiation and significance. Radiology. 1986 Jul; 160(1):9-16.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  102. Quinaglute-induced esophagitis mimicking an esophageal mass. Ann Intern Med. 1986 Jul; 105(1):62-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  103. Lack of trophic pancreatic effects in humans with long-term administration of ximelagatran. Pancreas. 2006 Mar; 32(2):205-10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  104. Fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma. Radiology. 1985 Dec; 157(3):583-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  105. Phase II trial of bevacizumab plus gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Nov 01; 23(31):8033-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  106. Normal erect swallowing. Normal function and incidence of variations. Invest Radiol. 1985 Oct; 20(7):717-26.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  107. CT colonography reporting and data system: a consensus proposal. Radiology. 2005 Jul; 236(1):3-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  108. Region-based supine-prone correspondence for the reduction of false-positive CAD polyp candidates in CT colonography. Acad Radiol. 2005 Jun; 12(6):695-707.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  109. Mucocele of the appendix and pseudomyxoma peritonei. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1985 May; 144(5):923-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  110. Analysis of air contrast barium enema, computed tomographic colonography, and colonoscopy: prospective comparison. Lancet. 2005 Jan 22-28; 365(9456):305-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  111. Virtual colonoscopy. JAMA. 2004 Jul 28; 292(4):431-2; author reply 433.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  112. Computerized detection of colorectal masses in CT colonography based on fuzzy merging and wall-thickening analysis. Med Phys. 2004 Apr; 31(4):860-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  113. Cystic neoplasms of the pancreas. Radiological-pathological correlation. Radiology. 1983 Oct; 149(1):45-50.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  114. Computerized tomographic colonography: performance evaluation in a retrospective multicenter setting. Gastroenterology. 2003 Sep; 125(3):688-95.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  115. Infantile hemangioendothelioma of the liver: a radiologic-pathologic-clinical correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1983 Jun; 140(6):1091-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  116. Preservation of nephrostomy tracts. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1983 Apr; 140(4):832-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  117. Computer-aided diagnosis scheme for detection of polyps at CT colonography. Radiographics. 2002 Jul-Aug; 22(4):963-79.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  118. Prospective evaluation of ureteral stent durability in patients with chronic ureteral obstruction. Urology. 2002 Jun; 59(6):847-50.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  119. Left ventricular pseudoaneurysm. Its recognition and significance. JAMA. 1981 Oct 23-30; 246(17):1951-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  120. Efficacy and safety of mangafodipir trisodium (MnDPDP) injection for hepatic MRI in adults: results of the U.S. Multicenter phase III clinical trials. Efficacy of early imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2000 Nov; 12(5):689-701.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  121. Safety and efficacy of mangafodipir trisodium (MnDPDP) injection for hepatic MRI in adults: results of the U.S. multicenter phase III clinical trials (safety). J Magn Reson Imaging. 2000 Jul; 12(1):186-97.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  122. Automated calculation of the centerline of the human colon on CT images. Acad Radiol. 1999 Jun; 6(6):352-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  123. Islet cell tumors of the pancreas: pathologic-imaging correlation among size, necrosis and cysts, calcification, malignant behavior, and functional status. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995 Nov; 165(5):1175-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  124. Prevalence and duration of postoperative pneumoperitoneum: sensitivity of CT vs left lateral decubitus radiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1993 Oct; 161(4):781-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  125. The biliary tract: imaging for the 1990s. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1991 Aug; 157(2):223-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  126. Polypoid and pseudopolypoid manifestations of inflammatory bowel disease. Radiographics. 1991 Mar; 11(2):293-304.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  127. Mesenteric and omental cysts: histologic classification with imaging correlation. Radiology. 1987 Aug; 164(2):327-32.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  128. Hemangioma of the spleen: radiologic-pathologic correlation in ten cases. Radiology. 1987 Jan; 162(1 Pt 1):73-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  129. Undifferentiated (embryonal) sarcoma of the liver: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiology. 1986 Oct; 161(1):141-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001
  130. Mesenchymal hamartoma of the liver: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiology. 1986 Mar; 158(3):619-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.000
  131. Solid and papillary epithelial neoplasm of the pancreas. Radiology. 1985 Feb; 154(2):333-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.000
  132. Timing in the normal pharyngeal swallow. Prospective selection and evaluation of 16 normal asymptomatic patients. Invest Radiol. 1984 Nov-Dec; 19(6):523-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.000
  133. Recognition of bicuspid aortic valve by plain film calcification. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1982 Nov; 139(5):867-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.000
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.