The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Abraham H. Dachman to Reproducibility of Results

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Abraham H. Dachman has written about Reproducibility of Results.
Abraham H. Dachman
Connection Strength
0.500
Reproducibility of Results
  1. Pancreas size and volume on computed tomography in normal adults. Pancreas. 2012 May; 41(4):589-95.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.067
  2. CT colonography: advanced computer-aided detection scheme utilizing MTANNs for detection of "missed" polyps in a multicenter clinical trial. Med Phys. 2010 Jan; 37(1):12-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.057
  3. Comparison of polyp size and volume at CT colonography: implications for follow-up CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Dec; 193(6):1561-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.057
  4. Bias, underestimation of risk, and loss of statistical power in patient-level analyses of lesion detection. Eur Radiol. 2010 Mar; 20(3):584-94.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  5. Comparison of 2D and 3D views for evaluation of flat lesions in CT colonography. Acad Radiol. 2010 Jan; 17(1):39-47.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  6. Cecal mobility: a potential pitfall of CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 Apr; 186(4):1086-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  7. Computerized detection of colonic polyps at CT colonography on the basis of volumetric features: pilot study. Radiology. 2002 Feb; 222(2):327-36.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  8. CT colonography: the next colon screening examination? Radiology. 2000 Aug; 216(2):331-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  9. The Added Value of the CT Colonography Reporting and Data System. J Am Coll Radiol. 2016 Aug; 13(8):931-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  10. CT colonography for the detection of nonpolypoid adenomas: sensitivity assessed with restricted national CT colonography trial criteria. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Dec; 203(6):W614-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  11. What's the control in studies measuring the effect of computer-aided detection (CAD) on observer performance? Acad Radiol. 2010 Jun; 17(6):761-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  12. CT colonography polyp matching: differences between experienced readers. Eur Radiol. 2009 Jul; 19(7):1723-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  13. Mixture of expert 3D massive-training ANNs for reduction of multiple types of false positives in CAD for detection of polyps in CT colonography. Med Phys. 2008 Feb; 35(2):694-703.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  14. Computerized detection of colorectal masses in CT colonography based on fuzzy merging and wall-thickening analysis. Med Phys. 2004 Apr; 31(4):860-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  15. Computer-aided diagnosis scheme for detection of polyps at CT colonography. Radiographics. 2002 Jul-Aug; 22(4):963-79.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.