Ursula Storb to DNA Repair
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Ursula Storb has written about DNA Repair.
Connection Strength
1.243
-
Somatic hypermutation: processivity of the cytosine deaminase AID and error-free repair of the resulting uracils. Cell Cycle. 2009 Oct 01; 8(19):3097-101.
Score: 0.265
-
Brca1 in immunoglobulin gene conversion and somatic hypermutation. DNA Repair (Amst). 2008 Feb 01; 7(2):253-66.
Score: 0.233
-
Different mismatch repair deficiencies all have the same effects on somatic hypermutation: intact primary mechanism accompanied by secondary modifications. J Exp Med. 1999 Jul 05; 190(1):21-30.
Score: 0.130
-
The role of DNA repair in somatic hypermutation of immunoglobulin genes. J Exp Med. 1998 Jun 01; 187(11):1729-33.
Score: 0.121
-
B lymphocytes of xeroderma pigmentosum or Cockayne syndrome patients with inherited defects in nucleotide excision repair are fully capable of somatic hypermutation of immunoglobulin genes. J Exp Med. 1997 Aug 04; 186(3):413-9.
Score: 0.114
-
The inactivation of the XP-C gene does not affect somatic hypermutation or class switch recombination of immunoglobulin genes. Mol Immunol. 1997 May; 34(7):527-33.
Score: 0.112
-
Nucleosome stability dramatically impacts the targeting of somatic hypermutation. Mol Cell Biol. 2012 May; 32(10):2030-40.
Score: 0.078
-
The very 5' end and the constant region of Ig genes are spared from somatic mutation because AID does not access these regions. J Exp Med. 2005 Nov 21; 202(10):1443-54.
Score: 0.051
-
A novel cytidine deaminase AIDs in the delivery of error-prone polymerases to immunoglobulin genes. DNA Repair (Amst). 2003 May 13; 2(5):623-7.
Score: 0.042
-
Somatic hypermutation of immunoglobulin and non-immunoglobulin genes. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2001 Jan 29; 356(1405):13-9.
Score: 0.036
-
Molecular aspects of somatic hypermutation of immunoglobulin genes. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1999; 64:227-34.
Score: 0.031
-
Cis-acting sequences that affect somatic hypermutation of Ig genes. Immunol Rev. 1998 Apr; 162:153-60.
Score: 0.030