Molly Przeworski to Models, Genetic
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Molly Przeworski has written about Models, Genetic.
Connection Strength
3.580
-
Contrasting Determinants of Mutation Rates in Germline and Soma. Genetics. 2017 09; 207(1):255-267.
Score: 0.399
-
Interpreting the Dependence of Mutation Rates on Age and Time. PLoS Biol. 2016 Jan; 14(1):e1002355.
Score: 0.359
-
A new approach to estimate parameters of speciation models with application to apes. Genome Res. 2007 Oct; 17(10):1505-19.
Score: 0.201
-
The signature of positive selection on standing genetic variation. Evolution. 2005 Nov; 59(11):2312-23.
Score: 0.177
-
Directional positive selection on an allele of arbitrary dominance. Genetics. 2006 Jan; 172(1):713-8.
Score: 0.176
-
The clock-like accumulation of germline and somatic mutations can arise from the interplay of DNA damage and repair. PLoS Biol. 2024 Jun; 22(6):e3002678.
Score: 0.161
-
Insights into recombination from patterns of linkage disequilibrium in humans. Genetics. 2004 May; 167(1):387-97.
Score: 0.160
-
Evidence for population growth in humans is confounded by fine-scale population structure. Trends Genet. 2002 Nov; 18(11):559-63.
Score: 0.144
-
Testing models of selection and demography in Drosophila simulans. Genetics. 2002 Sep; 162(1):203-16.
Score: 0.142
-
The signature of positive selection at randomly chosen loci. Genetics. 2002 Mar; 160(3):1179-89.
Score: 0.137
-
Linkage disequilibrium in humans: models and data. Am J Hum Genet. 2001 Jul; 69(1):1-14.
Score: 0.131
-
Why is there so little intragenic linkage disequilibrium in humans? Genet Res. 2001 Apr; 77(2):143-51.
Score: 0.129
-
The evolution of group differences in changing environments. PLoS Biol. 2021 01; 19(1):e3001072.
Score: 0.127
-
A genome-wide departure from the standard neutral model in natural populations of Drosophila. Genetics. 2000 Sep; 156(1):257-68.
Score: 0.124
-
A comparison of humans and baboons suggests germline mutation rates do not track cell divisions. PLoS Biol. 2020 08; 18(8):e3000838.
Score: 0.123
-
Measuring intolerance to mutation in human genetics. Nat Genet. 2019 05; 51(5):772-776.
Score: 0.112
-
Genealogies and weak purifying selection. Mol Biol Evol. 1999 Feb; 16(2):246-52.
Score: 0.111
-
Identifying genetic variants that affect viability in large cohorts. PLoS Biol. 2017 Sep; 15(9):e2002458.
Score: 0.101
-
An estimate of the average number of recessive lethal mutations carried by humans. Genetics. 2015 Apr; 199(4):1243-54.
Score: 0.084
-
A population genetics-phylogenetics approach to inferring natural selection in coding sequences. PLoS Genet. 2011 Dec; 7(12):e1002395.
Score: 0.067
-
Classic selective sweeps were rare in recent human evolution. Science. 2011 Feb 18; 331(6019):920-4.
Score: 0.064
-
An evolutionary view of human recombination. Nat Rev Genet. 2007 Jan; 8(1):23-34.
Score: 0.048
-
How reliable are empirical genomic scans for selective sweeps? Genome Res. 2006 Jun; 16(6):702-12.
Score: 0.046
-
Causal interpretations of family GWAS in the presence of heterogeneous effects. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Sep 17; 121(38):e2401379121.
Score: 0.041
-
Estimating the time since the fixation of a beneficial allele. Genetics. 2003 Aug; 164(4):1667-76.
Score: 0.038
-
A neutral explanation for the correlation of diversity with recombination rates in humans. Am J Hum Genet. 2003 Jun; 72(6):1527-35.
Score: 0.037
-
When did the human population size start increasing? Genetics. 2000 Aug; 155(4):1865-74.
Score: 0.031
-
Deconstructing the sources of genotype-phenotype associations in humans. Science. 2019 09 27; 365(6460):1396-1400.
Score: 0.029
-
The population genetics of human disease: The case of recessive, lethal mutations. PLoS Genet. 2017 Sep; 13(9):e1006915.
Score: 0.025
-
The ABO blood group is a trans-species polymorphism in primates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Nov 06; 109(45):18493-8.
Score: 0.018
-
Shifts in the intensity of purifying selection: an analysis of genome-wide polymorphism data from two closely related yeast species. Genome Res. 2010 Nov; 20(11):1558-73.
Score: 0.015
-
Combining sperm typing and linkage disequilibrium analyses reveals differences in selective pressures or recombination rates across human populations. Genetics. 2007 Feb; 175(2):795-804.
Score: 0.012
-
Absence of the TAP2 human recombination hotspot in chimpanzees. PLoS Biol. 2004 Jun; 2(6):e155.
Score: 0.010