Sarah Collins to Pelvic Organ Prolapse
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Sarah Collins has written about Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
Connection Strength
5.870
-
Surgical Decision-Making: Who Should Be Offered Sacrocolpopexy? Int Urogynecol J. 2024 Aug; 35(8):1577-1580.
Score: 0.804
-
Pelvic Organ Prolapse. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2022 03; 51(1):177-193.
Score: 0.674
-
International Urogynecological Consultation: clinical definition of pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2021 08; 32(8):2011-2019.
Score: 0.650
-
Impact of a Web-Based Decisional Aid on Satisfaction in Women Undergoing Prolapse Surgery. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021 02 01; 27(2):e309-e314.
Score: 0.632
-
Mind the Gap: Changes in Levator Dimensions After Sacrocolpopexy. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021 01 01; 27(1):e184-e186.
Score: 0.628
-
Effect of surgical approach on physical activity and pain control after sacral colpopexy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 May; 206(5):438.e1-6.
Score: 0.338
-
Correlation of POP-Q posterior compartment measures with defecatory dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J. 2012 Jun; 23(6):743-7.
Score: 0.337
-
Nerve injury during uterosacral ligament fixation: a cadaver study. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009 May; 20(5):505-8.
Score: 0.275
-
Single-Port Robotic Sacrocolpopexy: Description of an Advanced Minimally Invasive Approach and Review of the Relevant Literature. Int Urogynecol J. 2024 Sep; 35(9):1757-1762.
Score: 0.201
-
Short-term outcomes of single port robotic hysterectomy with concomitant sacrocolpopexy. J Robot Surg. 2024 Jun 21; 18(1):260.
Score: 0.200
-
Mesh complications after total vs supracervical laparoscopic hysterectomy at time of minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy. Int Urogynecol J. 2022 09; 33(9):2507-2514.
Score: 0.173
-
Ultrasound-Measured Urethral Length Does Not Change following Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse. South Med J. 2022 03; 115(3):187-191.
Score: 0.170
-
Does a Hysterectomy Hurt? Comparing Narcotic Requirements and Pain Scores in Patients Undergoing Apical Prolapse Repair With or Without Hysterectomy. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021 06 01; 27(6):356-359.
Score: 0.162
-
Restricted Convalescence Following Urogynecologic Procedures: 1-Year Outcomes From a Randomized Controlled Study. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021 02 01; 27(2):e336-e341.
Score: 0.158
-
Recovering sexual satisfaction after prolapse surgery: a secondary analysis of surgical recovery. Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Nov; 29(11):1675-1680.
Score: 0.132
-
Operating Room Efficiency: Examining the Impact of Personnel Handoffs. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2018 Mar-Apr; 24(2):87-89.
Score: 0.129
-
Activity Restriction Recommendations and Outcomes After Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2017 04; 129(4):608-614.
Score: 0.121
-
A randomized trial of retropubic vs single-incision sling among patients undergoing vaginal prolapse repair. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024 08; 231(2):261.e1-261.e10.
Score: 0.049
-
Truth or Myth: Intra-abdominal Pressure Increases in the Lithotomy Position. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021 01; 28(1):26-29.
Score: 0.037