The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Co-Authors

This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by Sarah Collins and Christina Lewicky-Gaupp.
Connection Strength

3.343
  1. Pelvic Organ Prolapse. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2022 03; 51(1):177-193.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.819
  2. Surgical Decision-Making: Who Should Be Offered Sacrocolpopexy? Int Urogynecol J. 2024 Aug; 35(8):1577-1580.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.244
  3. Use of a Computerized Decisional Analysis Tool in Patients With Urgency Urinary Incontinence. Urogynecology (Phila). 2023 09 01; 29(9):757-762.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.230
  4. Postpartum contraceptive uptake and fertility desires following obstetric anal sphincter injury. Int Urogynecol J. 2021 07; 32(7):1833-1838.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.194
  5. Early Secondary Repair of Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury Breakdown: Contemporary Surgical Techniques and Experiences From a Peripartum Subspecialty Clinic. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021 02 01; 27(2):e333-e335.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.192
  6. Impact of a Web-Based Decisional Aid on Satisfaction in Women Undergoing Prolapse Surgery. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021 02 01; 27(2):e309-e314.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.192
  7. Mind the Gap: Changes in Levator Dimensions After Sacrocolpopexy. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021 01 01; 27(1):e184-e186.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.191
  8. Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in Women With Female Genital Mutilation. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2019 Mar-Apr; 25(2):157-160.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.168
  9. Single-Port Robotic Sacrocolpopexy: Description of an Advanced Minimally Invasive Approach and Review of the Relevant Literature. Int Urogynecol J. 2024 Sep; 35(9):1757-1762.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.061
  10. Short-term outcomes of single port robotic hysterectomy with concomitant sacrocolpopexy. J Robot Surg. 2024 Jun 21; 18(1):260.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.061
  11. Suture-Needle Management Device and Novel Port Configuration for Robotic Sacrocolpopexy. Urogynecology (Phila). 2024 Apr 24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.060
  12. Patient Satisfaction With Telehealth Visits for New Patient Appointments for Pelvic Floor Disorders: A Randomized Trial of Telehealth Versus Standard In-Person Office Visits. Urogynecology (Phila). 2023 02 01; 29(2):273-280.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  13. Mesh complications after total vs supracervical laparoscopic hysterectomy at time of minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy. Int Urogynecol J. 2022 09; 33(9):2507-2514.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  14. Sex Differences in Commercial Patient Reviews of Women and Men Urogynecologic Surgeons. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2022 03 01; 28(3):173-176.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  15. Vaginal Electrical Stimulation for Postpartum Neuromuscular Recovery: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021 11 01; 27(11):659-666.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  16. Bare Versus Hair: Do Pubic Hair Grooming Preferences Dictate the Urogenital Microbiome? Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021 09 01; 27(9):532-537.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  17. Does a Hysterectomy Hurt? Comparing Narcotic Requirements and Pain Scores in Patients Undergoing Apical Prolapse Repair With or Without Hysterectomy. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021 06 01; 27(6):356-359.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  18. Rates of Sling Procedures and Revisions-A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database Study. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021 06 01; 27(6):e559-e562.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  19. The Influence of Patients' Goals on Surgical Satisfaction. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021 03 01; 27(3):170-174.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  20. Restricted Convalescence Following Urogynecologic Procedures: 1-Year Outcomes From a Randomized Controlled Study. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021 02 01; 27(2):e336-e341.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  21. The First Injection: Rates of Urinary Retention in Women With Urgency Incontinence Treated With Intravesical OnabotulinumtoxinA Injection. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021 01 01; 27(1):e118-e121.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  22. Concurrent Retropubic Midurethral Sling and OnabotulinumtoxinA for Mixed Urinary Incontinence: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2021 01 01; 137(1):12-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  23. Clinical Utility of Routine Preoperative Laboratory Assessment in a Urogynecologic Population. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2020 09; 26(9):550-553.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  24. Patients' Perceptions on Surgical Care Suspension for Pelvic Floor Disorders During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2020 08; 26(8):477-482.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  25. Truth or Myth: Intra-abdominal Pressure Increases in the Lithotomy Position. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021 01; 28(1):26-29.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  26. Minimizing Risks in Minimally Invasive Surgery: Rates of Surgical Site Infection Across Subtypes of Laparoscopic Hysterectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020 Sep - Oct; 27(6):1370-1376.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  27. Duration of Catheterization After Retropubic Midurethral Sling. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2019 Sep-Oct; 25(5):369-371.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  28. Recovering sexual satisfaction after prolapse surgery: a secondary analysis of surgical recovery. Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Nov; 29(11):1675-1680.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  29. Operating Room Efficiency: Examining the Impact of Personnel Handoffs. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2018 Mar-Apr; 24(2):87-89.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  30. Changing Referral Patterns to Urogynecology. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2018 Jan-Feb; 24(1):48-50.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  31. Activity Restriction Recommendations and Outcomes After Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2017 04; 129(4):608-614.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.