The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Mark Siegler to Humans

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Mark Siegler has written about Humans.
Connection Strength

0.588
  1. How to Integrate a Medical Ethics Curriculum into Gastroenterology Fellowships. Gastroenterology. 2021 03; 160(4):1003-1006.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  2. Statutes Governing Default Surrogate Decision Making for Mental Health Treatment. Psychiatr Serv. 2021 01 01; 72(1):81-84.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  3. Hiding in the Water. N Engl J Med. 2020 May 07; 382(19):1844-1849.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  4. Recollections of Dr. Elisabeth Kübler-Ross at the University of Chicago (1965-70). Am J Bioeth. 2019 Dec; 19(12):1-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  5. Physician-Assisted Suicide: Against Medical Neutrality. J Gen Intern Med. 2019 08; 34(8):1372.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  6. Surrogate Decision Making for Incarcerated Patients. JAMA Intern Med. 2019 07 01; 179(7):861-862.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  7. Practical allocation system for the distribution of specialised care during cellular therapy access scarcity. J Med Ethics. 2019 08; 45(8):532-537.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  8. Clinical Medical Ethics: Its History and Contributions to American Medicine. J Clin Ethics. 2019 Spring; 30(1):17-26.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  9. The ASBH Approach to Certify Clinical Ethics Consultants Is Both Premature and Inadequate. J Clin Ethics. 2019; 30(2):109-116.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  10. Creating Coherent Strategies to Combat the Crises of Opioid Scarcity and Abuse. J Clin Oncol. 2018 09 01; 36(25):2575-2577.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  11. Physician-Assisted Suicide: Why Neutrality by Organized Medicine Is Neither Neutral Nor Appropriate. J Gen Intern Med. 2018 08; 33(8):1394-1399.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  12. Medical ethics education in China: Lessons from three schools. Educ Health (Abingdon). 2017 Jan-Apr; 30(1):35-43.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  13. A Justifiable Asymmetry. J Clin Ethics. 2015; 26(2):100-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  14. Increasing the supply of kidneys for transplantation by making living donors the preferred source of donor kidneys. Medicine (Baltimore). 2014 Dec; 93(29):e318.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  15. The "call for help": intraoperative consultation and the surgeon-patient relationship. J Am Coll Surg. 2014 Dec; 219(6):1181-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  16. Should we use living donor grafts for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma? Ethical considerations. Liver Transpl. 2011 Oct; 17 Suppl 2:S128-32.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  17. The physician-surrogate relationship. Arch Intern Med. 2007 Jun 11; 167(11):1117-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  18. Should editorials in peer-reviewed journals be signed? Chest. 2006 Jun; 129(6):1395-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  19. Recipient deaths during donor surgery: a new ethical problem in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Liver Transpl. 2006 Mar; 12(3):358-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  20. Ethical issues in innovative colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005 Jun; 48(6):1109-13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  21. Inside information: Financial conflicts of interest for research subjects in early phase clinical trials. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 May 05; 96(9):656-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  22. Special challenges to the informed consent doctrine in the United States. J Clin Ethics. 2004; 15(1):38-47.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  23. The Bucksbaum Institute for Clinical Excellence and the Doctor-Patient Relationship: Origins, Programs, and Future Directions. Acad Med. 2023 06 01; 98(6S):S3-S5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  24. Disparities in Unilateral Do Not Resuscitate Order Use During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Crit Care Med. 2023 08 01; 51(8):1012-1022.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  25. Addressing sex-based disparities in solid organ transplantation in the United States - a conference report. Am J Transplant. 2023 03; 23(3):316-325.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  26. Organizers' introduction to the Symposium on Quality Health Care. Perspect Biol Med. 2003; 46(1):1-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  27. The case: can doctors say "enough"? Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2003; 12(2):215-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  28. Is medical research cost effective? Response to Murphy and Topel. Perspect Biol Med. 2003; 46(3 Suppl):S129-37.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  29. Training doctors for professionalism: some lessons from teaching clinical medical ethics. Mt Sinai J Med. 2002 Nov; 69(6):404-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  30. Ethics of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation under Conventional and Crisis Standards of Care. J Clin Ethics. 2022; 33(1):13-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  31. Clinician Ethical Perspectives on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Practice. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2022 Jun; 39(6):659-666.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  32. The Use of Slow Codes and Medically Futile Codes in Practice. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2021 08; 62(2):326-335.e5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  33. Decision-making Laws for "Unrepresented" Patients. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2020 11; 17(11):1484-1486.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  34. Professional values in modern clinical practice. Hastings Cent Rep. 2000 Jul-Aug; 30(4):S19-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  35. Professional values in modern clinical practice. Hastings Cent Rep. 2000 Jul-Aug; 30(4 Suppl):S19-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  36. Practice Changes at U.S. Transplant Centers After the New Adult Heart Allocation Policy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 06 16; 75(23):2906-2916.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  37. Variation in Ventilator Allocation Guidelines by US State During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic: A Systematic Review. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 06 01; 3(6):e2012606.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  38. A Qualitative Analysis of Oncology Patient Awareness of Medication Shortages and Their Preferences for How Shortages Should Be Managed. JCO Oncol Pract. 2020 10; 16(10):e1098-e1111.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  39. Bundled Consent in US Intensive Care Units. Am J Crit Care. 2020 05 01; 29(3):e44-e51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  40. A Cross-Sectional Survey of Medical Trainee Experiences During Medication Shortages. J Grad Med Educ. 2020 Feb; 12(1):38-43.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  41. Resident Perspectives on Teaching During Awake Surgical Procedures. J Surg Educ. 2019 Nov - Dec; 76(6):1492-1499.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  42. Prevalence and Severity of Rationing During Drug Shortages: A National Survey of Health System Pharmacists. JAMA Intern Med. 2019 05 01; 179(5):710-711.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  43. The Timing of Family Meetings in the Medical Intensive Care Unit. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2019 Dec; 36(12):1049-1056.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  44. Patient-provider communications about pharmacogenomic results increase patient recall of medication changes. Pharmacogenomics J. 2019 12; 19(6):528-537.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  45. Geographic Variation in the Treatment of U.S. Adult Heart Transplant Candidates. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 04 24; 71(16):1715-1725.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  46. Who Decides When a Patient Can't? Statutes on Alternate Decision Makers. N Engl J Med. 2017 Apr 13; 376(15):1478-1482.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  47. Surgeon-patient communication during awake procedures. Am J Surg. 2017 Jun; 213(6):996-1002.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  48. Intraoperative Decision Making: The Decision to Perform Additional, Unplanned Procedures on Anesthetized Patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2016 05; 222(5):956-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  49. Surgeon-family perioperative communication: surgeons' self-reported approaches to the "surgeon-family relationship". J Am Coll Surg. 2014 Nov; 219(5):958-67.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  50. Ethical issues in surgical innovation. World J Surg. 2014 Jul; 38(7):1638-43.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  51. History and evolution of surgical ethics: John Gregory to the twenty-first century. World J Surg. 2014 Jul; 38(7):1568-73.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  52. Adoption of a clinical pharmacogenomics implementation program during outpatient care--initial results of the University of Chicago "1,200 Patients Project". Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2014 Mar; 166C(1):68-75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  53. Left hepatectomy versus right hepatectomy for living donor liver transplantation: shifting the risk from the donor to the recipient. Liver Transpl. 2013 May; 19(5):472-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  54. Adult living-related liver donation for acute liver failure: is it ethically appropriate? Clin Transplant. 2011 Nov-Dec; 25(6):813-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  55. Physicians' views on the importance of patient preferences in surrogate decision-making. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 Mar; 58(3):533-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  56. Physicians' experience with surrogate decision making for hospitalized adults. J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Sep; 24(9):1023-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  57. Bariatric surgery: a history of empiricism, a future in science. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009 Mar; 13(3):465-77.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  58. Transplant innovation and ethical challenges: what have we learned? A collection of perspectives and panel discussion. Cleve Clin J Med. 2008 Nov; 75 Suppl 6:S24-9; discussion S30-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  59. Symposium: teaching and learning clinical medical ethics during residency training. Ann R Coll Physicians Surg Can. 1988 Sep; 21(6):423-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  60. Determining how much care society owes the dying. N Y Times Web. 1988 Jun 19; E5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  61. How decisions are made to admit patients to medical intensive care units (MICUs): a survey of MICU directors at academic medical centers across the United States. Crit Care Med. 2008 Feb; 36(2):414-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  62. Withdrawal from dialysis: an ethical perspective. Kidney Int. 1988; 34(1988):124-35.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  63. Rethinking the ethical framework for surrogate decision making: a qualitative study of physicians. J Clin Ethics. 2008; 19(2):110-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  64. Medical professionalism and the doctor-patient relationship. Perspect Biol Med. 2008; 51(4):547-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  65. We need a registry of living kidney donors. Hastings Cent Rep. 2007 Nov-Dec; 37(6):1 p following 48.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  66. Recommendations for implementation of community consultation and public disclosure under the Food and Drug Administration's "Exception from informed consent requirements for emergency research": a special report from the American Heart Association Emergency Cardiovascular Care Committee and Council on Cardiopulmonary, Perioperative and Critical Care: endorsed by the American College of Emergency Physicians and the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. Circulation. 2007 Oct 16; 116(16):1855-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  67. Recipient death during a live donor liver transplantation: who gets the "orphan" graft? Transplantation. 2004 Nov 15; 78(9):1241-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  68. Long-term quality of life issues among adult-to-pediatric living liver donors: a qualitative exploration. Am J Transplant. 2004 May; 4(5):744-50.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  69. Living donor liver transplantation: summary of a conference at The National Institutes of Health. Liver Transpl. 2002 Feb; 8(2):174-88.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.