The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Samuel Hellman to Prognosis

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Samuel Hellman has written about Prognosis.
Connection Strength

0.273
  1. Evolving paradigms and perceptions of cancer. Nat Clin Pract Oncol. 2005 Dec; 2(12):618-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  2. Importance of local control in an era of systemic therapy. Nat Clin Pract Oncol. 2005 Feb; 2(2):60-1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  3. Hormone therapy adjuvant to external beam radiotherapy for locally advanced prostate carcinoma: a complication-adjusted number-needed-to-treat analysis. Cancer. 2003 Dec 01; 98(11):2351-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  4. Individual characterisation of the metastatic capacity of human breast carcinoma. Eur J Cancer. 2000 Aug; 36(13 Spec No):1631-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  5. The clinical significance of tumor progression: breast cancer as a model. Cancer J. 2000 Apr; 6 Suppl 2:S131-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  6. Separating favorable from unfavorable prognostic markers in breast cancer: the role of E-cadherin. Cancer Res. 2000 Jan 15; 60(2):298-304.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  7. Assessment of intratumoral vascularization (angiogenesis) in breast cancer prognosis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1998; 52(1-3):147-58.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  8. Race and clinical outcome in breast cancer in a series with long-term follow-up evaluation. J Clin Oncol. 1997 Jun; 15(6):2329-37.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  9. Natural history of node-positive breast cancer: the curability of small cancers with a limited number of positive nodes. J Clin Oncol. 1996 Dec; 14(12):3105-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  10. Analysis of further disease progression in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: implications for locoregional treatment. Int J Oncol. 2004 Dec; 25(6):1677-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  11. Consensus statement: Expedition Inspiration fund for breast cancer research meeting 2002. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2003 Mar; 78(1):127-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.