David Meltzer to Health Care Costs
This is a "connection" page, showing publications David Meltzer has written about Health Care Costs.
Connection Strength
2.392
-
Costs of Quality Measurement-Reply. JAMA. 2018 02 13; 319(6):615-616.
Score: 0.546
-
Does prevention pay? Med Care. 2015 Apr; 53(4):291-2.
Score: 0.447
-
The real meaning of rationing. JAMA. 2010 Nov 24; 304(20):2292-3.
Score: 0.329
-
Effect of future costs on cost-effectiveness of medical interventions among young adults: the example of intensive therapy for type 1 diabetes mellitus. Med Care. 2000 Jun; 38(6):679-85.
Score: 0.160
-
Future unrelated medical costs need to be considered in cost effectiveness analysis. Eur J Health Econ. 2019 Feb; 20(1):1-5.
Score: 0.146
-
Accounting for future costs in medical cost-effectiveness analysis. J Health Econ. 1997 Feb; 16(1):33-64.
Score: 0.127
-
Future Costs, Fixed Healthcare Budgets, and the Decision Rules of Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Health Econ. 2016 Feb; 25(2):237-48.
Score: 0.110
-
The economic impact of childhood food allergy in the United States. JAMA Pediatr. 2013 Nov; 167(11):1026-31.
Score: 0.101
-
Delivering affordable cancer care in high-income countries. Lancet Oncol. 2011 Sep; 12(10):933-80.
Score: 0.087
-
Economic implications of nighttime attending intensivist coverage in a medical intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2011 Jun; 39(6):1257-62.
Score: 0.086
-
The economics of comparative effectiveness research. Neurology. 2010 Aug 10; 75(6):492-3.
Score: 0.081
-
Illustrating the impact of including future costs in economic evaluations: an application to end-stage renal disease care. Health Econ. 2003 Nov; 12(11):949-58.
Score: 0.051
-
Perspective and the measurement of costs and benefits for cost-effectiveness analysis in schizophrenia. J Clin Psychiatry. 1999; 60 Suppl 3:32-5; discussion 36-7.
Score: 0.036
-
Should cost effectiveness analyses for NICE always consider future unrelated medical costs? BMJ. 2017 11 10; 359:j5096.
Score: 0.033
-
Incorporating future costs in medical cost-effectiveness analysis: implications for the cost-effectiveness of the treatment of hypertension. Med Decis Making. 1997 Oct-Dec; 17(4):382-9.
Score: 0.033
-
To nap or not to nap? Residents' work hours revisited. N Engl J Med. 2009 May 21; 360(21):2242-4.
Score: 0.019