The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

David Meltzer to Quality of Health Care

This is a "connection" page, showing publications David Meltzer has written about Quality of Health Care.
Connection Strength

3.074
  1. Hospitalists and primary care. J Gen Intern Med. 2015 May; 30(5):541-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.408
  2. Quality indicators: the authors reply. Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 Apr; 33(4):723.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.379
  3. The population value of quality indicator reporting: a framework for prioritizing health care performance measures. Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 Jan; 33(1):132-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.373
  4. Improving inpatients' identification of their doctors: use of FACE cards. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2009 Dec; 35(12):613-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.281
  5. Relationship between quality of care and functional decline in hospitalized vulnerable elders. Med Care. 2009 Aug; 47(8):895-901.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.274
  6. Does doctor-patient communication affect patient satisfaction with hospital care? Results of an analysis with a novel instrumental variable. Health Serv Res. 2008 Oct; 43(5 Pt 1):1505-19.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.252
  7. Communication failures in patient sign-out and suggestions for improvement: a critical incident analysis. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005 Dec; 14(6):401-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.213
  8. Perceptions of the Doctor-Patient Relationship Among Patients in a Private, Secondary-Level Hospital in Southern India. Front Public Health. 2021; 9:768705.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.165
  9. Measuring the Cost of Quality Measurement: A Missing Link in Quality Strategy. JAMA. 2017 Oct 03; 318(13):1219-1220.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.121
  10. Co-management between hospitalist and hepatologist improves the quality of care of inpatients with chronic liver disease. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2014 Apr; 48(4):e30-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.095
  11. Migration of patients between five urban teaching hospitals in Chicago. J Med Syst. 2013 Apr; 37(2):9930.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.087
  12. What's in a name generator? Choosing the right name generators for social network surveys in healthcare quality and safety research. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Dec; 21(12):992-1000.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.085
  13. Attention to inpatients' religious and spiritual concerns: predictors and association with patient satisfaction. J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Nov; 26(11):1265-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.078
  14. Quality of care for decompensated heart failure: comparable performance between academic hospitalists and non-hospitalists. J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Sep; 23(9):1399-406.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.064
  15. Do hospitalists or physicians with greater inpatient HIV experience improve HIV care in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy? Results from a multicenter trial of academic hospitalists. Clin Infect Dis. 2008 Apr 01; 46(7):1085-92.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.063
  16. Does competition under Medicare Prospective Payment selectively reduce expenditures on high-cost patients? Rand J Econ. 2002; 33(3):447-68.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  17. Hospitalists and the doctor-patient relationship. J Legal Stud. 2001 Jun; 30(2):589-606.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  18. Recommendations for Conduct, Methodological Practices, and Reporting of Cost-effectiveness Analyses: Second Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. JAMA. 2016 Sep 13; 316(10):1093-103.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  19. Understanding communication during hospitalist service changes: a mixed methods study. J Hosp Med. 2009 Nov; 4(9):535-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  20. Coordinating care across diseases, settings, and clinicians: a key role for the generalist in practice. Ann Intern Med. 2005 Apr 19; 142(8):700-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.