The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

David Meltzer to Models, Statistical

This is a "connection" page, showing publications David Meltzer has written about Models, Statistical.
Connection Strength

0.596
  1. Predicting utility ratings for joint health States from single health States in prostate cancer: empirical testing of 3 alternative theories. Med Decis Making. 2008 Jan-Feb; 28(1):102-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.239
  2. Multicenter Comparison of Machine Learning Methods and Conventional Regression for Predicting Clinical Deterioration on the Wards. Crit Care Med. 2016 Feb; 44(2):368-74.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.105
  3. A time tradeoff method for eliciting partner's quality of life due to patient's health states in prostate cancer. Med Decis Making. 2010 May-Jun; 30(3):355-65.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.070
  4. The impact of patient preferences on the cost-effectiveness of intensive glucose control in older patients with new-onset diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2006 Feb; 29(2):259-64.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  5. Implications of spillover effects within the family for medical cost-effectiveness analysis. J Health Econ. 2005 Jul; 24(4):751-73.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  6. Future Costs, Fixed Healthcare Budgets, and the Decision Rules of Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Health Econ. 2016 Feb; 25(2):237-48.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  7. Multicenter development and validation of a risk stratification tool for ward patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014 Sep 15; 190(6):649-55.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  8. Use of cost-effectiveness analysis to determine inventory size for a national cord blood bank. Med Decis Making. 2008 Mar-Apr; 28(2):243-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  9. The cost-effectiveness of improving diabetes care in U.S. federally qualified community health centers. Health Serv Res. 2007 Dec; 42(6 Pt 1):2174-93; discussion 2294-323.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.