Dana Edelson to Humans
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Dana Edelson has written about Humans.
Connection Strength
1.250
-
Causes, Diagnostic Testing, and Treatments Related to Clinical Deterioration Events Among High-Risk Ward Patients. Crit Care Explor. 2024 Oct 01; 6(10):e1161.
Score: 0.032
-
Early Warning Scores With and Without Artificial Intelligence. JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Oct 01; 7(10):e2438986.
Score: 0.032
-
A novel structured debriefing program for consensus determinations of in-hospital cardiac arrest predictability and preventability. Resuscitation. 2024 04; 197:110161.
Score: 0.031
-
Less is more: Detecting clinical deterioration in the hospital with machine learning using only age, heart rate, and respiratory rate. Resuscitation. 2021 11; 168:6-10.
Score: 0.026
-
Scratching the Surface of Clinical Deterioration With Deep Learning. Crit Care Med. 2021 08 01; 49(8):1366-1368.
Score: 0.026
-
Determining the Electronic Signature of Infection in Electronic Health Record Data. Crit Care Med. 2021 07 01; 49(7):e673-e682.
Score: 0.025
-
Interim Guidance for Basic and Advanced Life Support in Adults, Children, and Neonates With Suspected or Confirmed COVID-19: From the Emergency Cardiovascular Care Committee and Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation Adult and Pediatric Task Forces of the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2020 06 23; 141(25):e933-e943.
Score: 0.023
-
Validation of Early Warning Scores at Two Long-Term Acute Care Hospitals. Crit Care Med. 2019 12; 47(12):e962-e965.
Score: 0.023
-
Validating the Electronic Cardiac Arrest Risk Triage (eCART) Score for Risk Stratification of Surgical Inpatients in the Postoperative Setting: Retrospective Cohort Study. Ann Surg. 2019 06; 269(6):1059-1063.
Score: 0.022
-
Accuracy Comparisons between Manual and Automated Respiratory Rate for Detecting Clinical Deterioration in Ward Patients. J Hosp Med. 2018 07 01; 13(7):486-487.
Score: 0.020
-
'Who's Covering This Patient?' Developing a First-Contact Provider (FCP) Designation in an Electronic Health Record. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2018 02; 44(2):107-113.
Score: 0.020
-
Comparison of the Between the Flags calling criteria to the MEWS, NEWS and the electronic Cardiac Arrest Risk Triage (eCART) score for the identification of deteriorating ward patients. Resuscitation. 2018 02; 123:86-91.
Score: 0.020
-
Investigating the Impact of Different Suspicion of Infection Criteria on the Accuracy of Quick Sepsis-Related Organ Failure Assessment, Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome, and Early Warning Scores. Crit Care Med. 2017 Nov; 45(11):1805-1812.
Score: 0.020
-
More Than a Prompt May be Needed to Improve Palliative Care Discussions for Hospitalized Patients. Crit Care Med. 2017 06; 45(6):e629-e630.
Score: 0.019
-
Quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment, Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome, and Early Warning Scores for Detecting Clinical Deterioration in Infected Patients outside the Intensive Care Unit. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 04 01; 195(7):906-911.
Score: 0.019
-
Detecting Sepsis: Are Two Opinions Better Than One? J Hosp Med. 2017 04; 12(4):256-258.
Score: 0.019
-
Real-Time Risk Prediction on the Wards: A Feasibility Study. Crit Care Med. 2016 08; 44(8):1468-73.
Score: 0.018
-
Association between intensive care unit transfer delay and hospital mortality: A multicenter investigation. J Hosp Med. 2016 11; 11(11):757-762.
Score: 0.018
-
Testing the functional assessment of mentation: A mobile application based assessment of mental status. J Hosp Med. 2016 07; 11(7):463-6.
Score: 0.018
-
The value of vital sign trends for detecting clinical deterioration on the wards. Resuscitation. 2016 May; 102:1-5.
Score: 0.018
-
Multicenter Comparison of Machine Learning Methods and Conventional Regression for Predicting Clinical Deterioration on the Wards. Crit Care Med. 2016 Feb; 44(2):368-74.
Score: 0.017
-
Incidence and Prognostic Value of the Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome and Organ Dysfunctions in Ward Patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015 Oct 15; 192(8):958-64.
Score: 0.017
-
Comparison of mental-status scales for predicting mortality on the general wards. J Hosp Med. 2015 Oct; 10(10):658-63.
Score: 0.017
-
In reference to "Development, implementation, and impact of an automated early warning and response system for sepsis". J Hosp Med. 2015 May; 10(5):340.
Score: 0.017
-
Differences in vital signs between elderly and nonelderly patients prior to ward cardiac arrest. Crit Care Med. 2015 Apr; 43(4):816-22.
Score: 0.016
-
In search of the optimal rapid response system bundle. J Hosp Med. 2015 Jun; 10(6):411.
Score: 0.016
-
The value of clinical judgment in the detection of clinical deterioration. JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Mar; 175(3):456-8.
Score: 0.016
-
Multicenter development and validation of a risk stratification tool for ward patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014 Sep 15; 190(6):649-55.
Score: 0.016
-
Relationship between ICU bed availability, ICU readmission, and cardiac arrest in the general wards. Crit Care Med. 2014 Sep; 42(9):2037-41.
Score: 0.016
-
Reply to Letter: Electronic documentation of cardiac arrests. Electronic resuscitation documentation: Tremendous promise with real-world challenges. Resuscitation. 2014 Sep; 85(9):e143.
Score: 0.016
-
Using electronic health record data to develop and validate a prediction model for adverse outcomes in the wards*. Crit Care Med. 2014 Apr; 42(4):841-8.
Score: 0.015
-
Acutely ill patients will likely benefit from more monitoring, not less--reply. JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Mar; 174(3):475-6.
Score: 0.015
-
Hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation practice in the United States: a nationally representative survey. J Hosp Med. 2014 Jun; 9(6):353-7.
Score: 0.015
-
Capnography as insight into etiology: a case of cardiac arrest following aortic rupture. Resuscitation. 2014 Apr; 85(4):e55-6.
Score: 0.015
-
Tablet-based cardiac arrest documentation: a pilot study. Resuscitation. 2014 Feb; 85(2):266-9.
Score: 0.015
-
Optimal loop duration during the provision of in-hospital advanced life support (ALS) to patients with an initial non-shockable rhythm. Resuscitation. 2014 Jan; 85(1):75-81.
Score: 0.015
-
A prospective study of nighttime vital sign monitoring frequency and risk of clinical deterioration. JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Sep 09; 173(16):1554-5.
Score: 0.015
-
Deconstructing debriefing for simulation-based education. JAMA Pediatr. 2013 Jun; 167(6):586-7.
Score: 0.015
-
Risk stratification of hospitalized patients on the wards. Chest. 2013 Jun; 143(6):1758-1765.
Score: 0.015
-
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation outcomes in hospitalized community-dwelling individuals and nursing home residents based on activities of daily living. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013 Jan; 61(1):34-9.
Score: 0.014
-
Supplementing cross-cover communication with the patient acuity rating. J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Mar; 28(3):406-11.
Score: 0.014
-
Predicting clinical deterioration in the hospital: the impact of outcome selection. Resuscitation. 2013 May; 84(5):564-8.
Score: 0.014
-
Sifting through the heterogeneity of the Rapid Response System literature. Resuscitation. 2012 Dec; 83(12):1419-20.
Score: 0.014
-
Derivation of a cardiac arrest prediction model using ward vital signs*. Crit Care Med. 2012 Jul; 40(7):2102-8.
Score: 0.014
-
The impact of a step stool on cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a cross-over mannequin study. Resuscitation. 2012 Jul; 83(7):874-8.
Score: 0.013
-
Predicting cardiac arrest on the wards: a nested case-control study. Chest. 2012 May; 141(5):1170-1176.
Score: 0.013
-
Patient acuity rating: quantifying clinical judgment regarding inpatient stability. J Hosp Med. 2011 Oct; 6(8):475-9.
Score: 0.013
-
Safety and efficacy of defibrillator charging during ongoing chest compressions: a multi-center study. Resuscitation. 2010 Nov; 81(11):1521-6.
Score: 0.012
-
Assessing the impact of immersive simulation on clinical performance during actual in-hospital cardiac arrest with CPR-sensing technology: A randomized feasibility study. Resuscitation. 2010 Nov; 81(11):1556-61.
Score: 0.012
-
A weak link in the rapid response system. Arch Intern Med. 2010 Jan 11; 170(1):12-3.
Score: 0.011
-
Capnography and chest-wall impedance algorithms for ventilation detection during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2010 Mar; 81(3):317-22.
Score: 0.011
-
Improving in-hospital cardiac arrest process and outcomes with performance debriefing. Arch Intern Med. 2008 May 26; 168(10):1063-9.
Score: 0.010
-
Effects of compression depth and pre-shock pauses predict defibrillation failure during cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2006 Nov; 71(2):137-45.
Score: 0.009
-
Development and Validation of a Machine Learning Model for Early Detection of Untreated Infection. Crit Care Explor. 2024 Oct 01; 6(10):e1165.
Score: 0.008
-
Development and Validation of a Machine Learning COVID-19 Veteran (COVet) Deterioration Risk Score. Crit Care Explor. 2024 Jul 01; 6(7):e1116.
Score: 0.008
-
Development and external validation of deep learning clinical prediction models using variable-length time series data. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024 May 20; 31(6):1322-1330.
Score: 0.008
-
Executive Summary: Society of Critical Care Medicine Guidelines on Recognizing and Responding to Clinical Deterioration Outside the ICU. Crit Care Med. 2024 02 01; 52(2):307-313.
Score: 0.008
-
Society of Critical Care Medicine Guidelines on Recognizing and Responding to Clinical Deterioration Outside the ICU: 2023. Crit Care Med. 2024 02 01; 52(2):314-330.
Score: 0.008
-
Ten Steps Toward Improving In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Quality of Care and Outcomes. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2023 11; 16(11):e010491.
Score: 0.007
-
Temperature Trajectory Subphenotypes in Oncology Patients with Neutropenia and Suspected Infection. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2023 05 15; 207(10):1300-1309.
Score: 0.007
-
Identifying infected patients using semi-supervised and transfer learning. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 09 12; 29(10):1696-1704.
Score: 0.007
-
The Impact of a Machine Learning Early Warning Score on Hospital Mortality: A Multicenter Clinical Intervention Trial. Crit Care Med. 2022 09 01; 50(9):1339-1347.
Score: 0.007
-
Predicting neurological outcomes after in-hospital cardiac arrests for patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019. Resuscitation. 2022 09; 178:55-62.
Score: 0.007
-
Development and External Validation of a Machine Learning Model for Prediction of Potential Transfer to the PICU. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2022 07 01; 23(7):514-523.
Score: 0.007
-
Comparison of early warning scores for predicting clinical deterioration and infection in obstetric patients. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Apr 06; 22(1):295.
Score: 0.007
-
Comparison of Machine Learning Methods for Predicting Outcomes After In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. Crit Care Med. 2022 02 01; 50(2):e162-e172.
Score: 0.007
-
2022 Interim Guidance to Health Care Providers for Basic and Advanced Cardiac Life Support in Adults, Children, and Neonates With Suspected or Confirmed COVID-19: From the Emergency Cardiovascular Care Committee and Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation Adult and Pediatric Task Forces of the American Heart Association in Collaboration With the American Academy of Pediatrics, American Association for Respiratory Care, the Society of Critical Care Anesthesiologists, and American Society of Anesthesiologists. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2022 04; 15(4):e008900.
Score: 0.007
-
2021 Interim Guidance to Health Care Providers for Basic and Advanced Cardiac Life Support in Adults, Children, and Neonates With Suspected or Confirmed COVID-19. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2021 10; 14(10):e008396.
Score: 0.006
-
Interim Guidance for Emergency Medical Services Management of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2021 07; 14(7):e007666.
Score: 0.006
-
Factors associated with non-survival from in-hospital maternal cardiac arrest: An analysis of Get With The Guidelines® (GWTG) data. Resuscitation. 2021 07; 164:40-45.
Score: 0.006
-
A Vital Sign-Based Model to Predict Clinical Deterioration in Hospitalized Children. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2020 09; 21(9):820-826.
Score: 0.006
-
Internal and External Validation of a Machine Learning Risk Score for Acute Kidney Injury. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 08 03; 3(8):e2012892.
Score: 0.006
-
Accuracy of Clinicians' Ability to Predict the Need for Intensive Care Unit Readmission. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2020 07; 17(7):847-853.
Score: 0.006
-
Predicting clinical deterioration with Q-ADDS compared to NEWS, Between the Flags, and eCART track and trigger tools. Resuscitation. 2020 08; 153:28-34.
Score: 0.006
-
Comparison of Early Warning Scoring Systems for Hospitalized Patients With and Without Infection at Risk for In-Hospital Mortality and Transfer to the Intensive Care Unit. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 05 01; 3(5):e205191.
Score: 0.006
-
Characteristics of Rapid Response Calls in the United States: An Analysis of the First 402,023 Adult Cases From the Get With the Guidelines Resuscitation-Medical Emergency Team Registry. Crit Care Med. 2019 10; 47(10):1283-1289.
Score: 0.006
-
Quality metrics for the evaluation of Rapid Response Systems: Proceedings from the third international consensus conference on Rapid Response Systems. Resuscitation. 2019 08; 141:1-12.
Score: 0.005
-
Response. Chest. 2018 12; 154(6):1462.
Score: 0.005
-
Characteristics and outcomes of maternal cardiac arrest: A descriptive analysis of Get with the guidelines data. Resuscitation. 2018 11; 132:17-20.
Score: 0.005
-
Predictors of In-Hospital Mortality After Rapid Response Team Calls in a 274 Hospital Nationwide Sample. Crit Care Med. 2018 07; 46(7):1041-1048.
Score: 0.005
-
The Development of a Machine Learning Inpatient Acute Kidney Injury Prediction Model. Crit Care Med. 2018 07; 46(7):1070-1077.
Score: 0.005
-
Predicting Intensive Care Unit Readmission with Machine Learning Using Electronic Health Record Data. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2018 07; 15(7):846-853.
Score: 0.005
-
Implications of Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Early Management Bundle and Initial Lactate Measurement on the Management of Sepsis. Chest. 2018 08; 154(2):302-308.
Score: 0.005
-
Rapid response systems. Resuscitation. 2018 07; 128:191-197.
Score: 0.005
-
Electronic cardiac arrest triage score best predicts mortality after intervention in patients with massive and submassive pulmonary embolism. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 08 01; 92(2):366-371.
Score: 0.005
-
Association Between Survival and Time of Day for Rapid Response Team Calls in a National Registry. Crit Care Med. 2017 10; 45(10):1677-1682.
Score: 0.005
-
Association Between Opioid and Benzodiazepine Use and Clinical Deterioration in Ward Patients. J Hosp Med. 2017 06; 12(6):428-434.
Score: 0.005
-
Mechanical chest compressions improve rate of return of spontaneous circulation and allow for initiation of percutaneous circulatory support during cardiac arrest in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. Resuscitation. 2017 06; 115:56-60.
Score: 0.005
-
Trainees at a resuscitation: a dual liability. Clin Teach. 2018 02; 15(1):38-43.
Score: 0.005
-
Association Between In-Hospital Critical Illness Events and Outcomes in Patients on the Same Ward. JAMA. 2016 12 27; 316(24):2674-2675.
Score: 0.005
-
Location of In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in the United States-Variability in Event Rate and Outcomes. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 09 29; 5(10).
Score: 0.005
-
Development of a Multicenter Ward-Based AKI Prediction Model. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016 11 07; 11(11):1935-1943.
Score: 0.005
-
Identifying Patients With Sepsis on the Hospital Wards. Chest. 2017 04; 151(4):898-907.
Score: 0.004
-
Physiologic monitoring of CPR quality during adult cardiac arrest: A propensity-matched cohort study. Resuscitation. 2016 09; 106:76-82.
Score: 0.004
-
A PIECE OF MY MIND. Mentorship Malpractice. JAMA. 2016 Apr 12; 315(14):1453-4.
Score: 0.004
-
In reference to "Preliminary development of an ultrabrief two-item bedside test for delirium.". J Hosp Med. 2016 Feb; 11(2):155.
Score: 0.004
-
In response to "Obstructive sleep apnea and adverse outcomes in surgical and nonsurgical patients on the wards". J Hosp Med. 2016 Feb; 11(2):157.
Score: 0.004
-
Part 4: Systems of Care and Continuous Quality Improvement: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2015 Nov 03; 132(18 Suppl 2):S397-413.
Score: 0.004
-
Obstructive sleep apnea and adverse outcomes in surgical and nonsurgical patients on the wards. J Hosp Med. 2015 Sep; 10(9):592-8.
Score: 0.004
-
Quantitative relationship between end-tidal carbon dioxide and CPR quality during both in-hospital and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2015 Apr; 89:149-54.
Score: 0.004
-
Racial disparities in outcomes following PEA and asystole in-hospital cardiac arrests. Resuscitation. 2015 Feb; 87:69-74.
Score: 0.004
-
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality: [corrected] improving cardiac resuscitation outcomes both inside and outside the hospital: a consensus statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2013 Jul 23; 128(4):417-35.
Score: 0.004
-
Clinical state transitions during advanced life support (ALS) in in-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2013 Sep; 84(9):1238-44.
Score: 0.004
-
Strategies for improving survival after in-hospital cardiac arrest in the United States: 2013 consensus recommendations: a consensus statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2013 Apr 09; 127(14):1538-63.
Score: 0.004
-
Early cardiac arrest in patients hospitalized with pneumonia: a report from the American Heart Association's Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation Program. Chest. 2012 Jun; 141(6):1528-1536.
Score: 0.003
-
Perishock pause: an independent predictor of survival from out-of-hospital shockable cardiac arrest. Circulation. 2011 Jul 05; 124(1):58-66.
Score: 0.003
-
Delivering high-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation in-hospital. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2011 Jun; 17(3):225-30.
Score: 0.003
-
Part 4: CPR overview: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2010 Nov 02; 122(18 Suppl 3):S676-84.
Score: 0.003
-
Effects of provider characteristics on care coordination under comanagement. J Hosp Med. 2010 Nov-Dec; 5(9):508-13.
Score: 0.003
-
Neurologic prognostication and bispectral index monitoring after resuscitation from cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2010 Sep; 81(9):1133-7.
Score: 0.003
-
Lamotrigine: an unusual etiology for aseptic meningitis. Neurologist. 2010 Jan; 16(1):35-6.
Score: 0.003
-
Rescuer fatigue during actual in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation with audiovisual feedback: a prospective multicenter study. Resuscitation. 2009 Sep; 80(9):981-4.
Score: 0.003
-
The use of CPR feedback/prompt devices during training and CPR performance: A systematic review. Resuscitation. 2009 Jul; 80(7):743-51.
Score: 0.003
-
Derangements in blood glucose following initial resuscitation from in-hospital cardiac arrest: a report from the national registry of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2009 Jun; 80(6):624-30.
Score: 0.003
-
Uniform reporting of measured quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Resuscitation. 2007 Sep; 74(3):406-17.
Score: 0.002
-
CPR quality improvement during in-hospital cardiac arrest using a real-time audiovisual feedback system. Resuscitation. 2007 Apr; 73(1):54-61.
Score: 0.002
-
Pauses in chest compression and inappropriate shocks: a comparison of manual and semi-automatic defibrillation attempts. Resuscitation. 2007 May; 73(2):212-20.
Score: 0.002
-
Difficulty of cardiac arrest rhythm identification does not correlate with length of chest compression pause before defibrillation. Crit Care Med. 2006 Dec; 34(12 Suppl):S427-31.
Score: 0.002
-
Therapeutic hypothermia utilization among physicians after resuscitation from cardiac arrest. Crit Care Med. 2006 Jul; 34(7):1935-40.
Score: 0.002
-
Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation during in-hospital cardiac arrest. JAMA. 2005 Jan 19; 293(3):305-10.
Score: 0.002