Dana Edelson to Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Dana Edelson has written about Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.
Connection Strength
7.785
-
A novel structured debriefing program for consensus determinations of in-hospital cardiac arrest predictability and preventability. Resuscitation. 2024 04; 197:110161.
Score: 0.739
-
Interim Guidance for Basic and Advanced Life Support in Adults, Children, and Neonates With Suspected or Confirmed COVID-19: From the Emergency Cardiovascular Care Committee and Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation Adult and Pediatric Task Forces of the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2020 06 23; 141(25):e933-e943.
Score: 0.564
-
Reply to Letter: Electronic documentation of cardiac arrests. Electronic resuscitation documentation: Tremendous promise with real-world challenges. Resuscitation. 2014 Sep; 85(9):e143.
Score: 0.377
-
Hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation practice in the United States: a nationally representative survey. J Hosp Med. 2014 Jun; 9(6):353-7.
Score: 0.369
-
Tablet-based cardiac arrest documentation: a pilot study. Resuscitation. 2014 Feb; 85(2):266-9.
Score: 0.360
-
Deconstructing debriefing for simulation-based education. JAMA Pediatr. 2013 Jun; 167(6):586-7.
Score: 0.351
-
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation outcomes in hospitalized community-dwelling individuals and nursing home residents based on activities of daily living. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013 Jan; 61(1):34-9.
Score: 0.341
-
The impact of a step stool on cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a cross-over mannequin study. Resuscitation. 2012 Jul; 83(7):874-8.
Score: 0.322
-
Safety and efficacy of defibrillator charging during ongoing chest compressions: a multi-center study. Resuscitation. 2010 Nov; 81(11):1521-6.
Score: 0.293
-
Assessing the impact of immersive simulation on clinical performance during actual in-hospital cardiac arrest with CPR-sensing technology: A randomized feasibility study. Resuscitation. 2010 Nov; 81(11):1556-61.
Score: 0.289
-
Capnography and chest-wall impedance algorithms for ventilation detection during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2010 Mar; 81(3):317-22.
Score: 0.277
-
Improving in-hospital cardiac arrest process and outcomes with performance debriefing. Arch Intern Med. 2008 May 26; 168(10):1063-9.
Score: 0.248
-
Effects of compression depth and pre-shock pauses predict defibrillation failure during cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2006 Nov; 71(2):137-45.
Score: 0.220
-
Ten Steps Toward Improving In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Quality of Care and Outcomes. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2023 11; 16(11):e010491.
Score: 0.181
-
Predicting neurological outcomes after in-hospital cardiac arrests for patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019. Resuscitation. 2022 09; 178:55-62.
Score: 0.165
-
2022 Interim Guidance to Health Care Providers for Basic and Advanced Cardiac Life Support in Adults, Children, and Neonates With Suspected or Confirmed COVID-19: From the Emergency Cardiovascular Care Committee and Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation Adult and Pediatric Task Forces of the American Heart Association in Collaboration With the American Academy of Pediatrics, American Association for Respiratory Care, the Society of Critical Care Anesthesiologists, and American Society of Anesthesiologists. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2022 04; 15(4):e008900.
Score: 0.160
-
2021 Interim Guidance to Health Care Providers for Basic and Advanced Cardiac Life Support in Adults, Children, and Neonates With Suspected or Confirmed COVID-19. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2021 10; 14(10):e008396.
Score: 0.157
-
Interim Guidance for Emergency Medical Services Management of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2021 07; 14(7):e007666.
Score: 0.153
-
Factors associated with non-survival from in-hospital maternal cardiac arrest: An analysis of Get With The GuidelinesĀ® (GWTG) data. Resuscitation. 2021 07; 164:40-45.
Score: 0.152
-
Characteristics and outcomes of maternal cardiac arrest: A descriptive analysis of Get with the guidelines data. Resuscitation. 2018 11; 132:17-20.
Score: 0.126
-
Mechanical chest compressions improve rate of return of spontaneous circulation and allow for initiation of percutaneous circulatory support during cardiac arrest in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. Resuscitation. 2017 06; 115:56-60.
Score: 0.114
-
Trainees at a resuscitation: a dual liability. Clin Teach. 2018 02; 15(1):38-43.
Score: 0.114
-
Location of In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in the United States-Variability in Event Rate and Outcomes. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 09 29; 5(10).
Score: 0.110
-
Physiologic monitoring of CPR quality during adult cardiac arrest: A propensity-matched cohort study. Resuscitation. 2016 09; 106:76-82.
Score: 0.108
-
Part 4: Systems of Care and Continuous Quality Improvement: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2015 Nov 03; 132(18 Suppl 2):S397-413.
Score: 0.104
-
Quantitative relationship between end-tidal carbon dioxide and CPR quality during both in-hospital and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2015 Apr; 89:149-54.
Score: 0.098
-
Racial disparities in outcomes following PEA and asystole in-hospital cardiac arrests. Resuscitation. 2015 Feb; 87:69-74.
Score: 0.097
-
Capnography as insight into etiology: a case of cardiac arrest following aortic rupture. Resuscitation. 2014 Apr; 85(4):e55-6.
Score: 0.092
-
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality: [corrected] improving cardiac resuscitation outcomes both inside and outside the hospital: a consensus statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2013 Jul 23; 128(4):417-35.
Score: 0.088
-
Clinical state transitions during advanced life support (ALS) in in-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2013 Sep; 84(9):1238-44.
Score: 0.087
-
Strategies for improving survival after in-hospital cardiac arrest in the United States: 2013 consensus recommendations: a consensus statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2013 Apr 09; 127(14):1538-63.
Score: 0.086
-
Perishock pause: an independent predictor of survival from out-of-hospital shockable cardiac arrest. Circulation. 2011 Jul 05; 124(1):58-66.
Score: 0.077
-
Delivering high-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation in-hospital. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2011 Jun; 17(3):225-30.
Score: 0.076
-
Part 4: CPR overview: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2010 Nov 02; 122(18 Suppl 3):S676-84.
Score: 0.073
-
Neurologic prognostication and bispectral index monitoring after resuscitation from cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2010 Sep; 81(9):1133-7.
Score: 0.072
-
A weak link in the rapid response system. Arch Intern Med. 2010 Jan 11; 170(1):12-3.
Score: 0.069
-
Rescuer fatigue during actual in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation with audiovisual feedback: a prospective multicenter study. Resuscitation. 2009 Sep; 80(9):981-4.
Score: 0.067
-
The use of CPR feedback/prompt devices during training and CPR performance: A systematic review. Resuscitation. 2009 Jul; 80(7):743-51.
Score: 0.066
-
Derangements in blood glucose following initial resuscitation from in-hospital cardiac arrest: a report from the national registry of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2009 Jun; 80(6):624-30.
Score: 0.066
-
Uniform reporting of measured quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Resuscitation. 2007 Sep; 74(3):406-17.
Score: 0.057
-
CPR quality improvement during in-hospital cardiac arrest using a real-time audiovisual feedback system. Resuscitation. 2007 Apr; 73(1):54-61.
Score: 0.056
-
Pauses in chest compression and inappropriate shocks: a comparison of manual and semi-automatic defibrillation attempts. Resuscitation. 2007 May; 73(2):212-20.
Score: 0.056
-
Difficulty of cardiac arrest rhythm identification does not correlate with length of chest compression pause before defibrillation. Crit Care Med. 2006 Dec; 34(12 Suppl):S427-31.
Score: 0.056
-
Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation during in-hospital cardiac arrest. JAMA. 2005 Jan 19; 293(3):305-10.
Score: 0.049