The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Farr Curlin to Physician-Patient Relations

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Farr Curlin has written about Physician-Patient Relations.
Connection Strength

5.971
  1. How Should Physicians Respond to Patient Requests for Religious Concordance? AMA J Ethics. 2019 06 01; 21(6):E485-492.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.471
  2. Conscience and the Way of Medicine. Perspect Biol Med. 2019; 62(3):560-575.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.458
  3. What Should Physicians and Chaplains Do When a Patient Believes God Wants Him to Suffer? AMA J Ethics. 2018 Jul 01; 20(7):E613-620.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.442
  4. US primary care physicians' opinions about conscientious refusal: a national vignette experiment. J Med Ethics. 2016 Feb; 42(2):80-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.359
  5. Directive counsel and morally controversial medical decision-making: findings from two national surveys of primary care physicians. J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Feb; 29(2):335-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.319
  6. Substituted judgment in principle and practice: a national physician survey. Mayo Clin Proc. 2013 Jul; 88(7):666-73.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.313
  7. Jewish physicians' beliefs and practices regarding religion/spirituality in the clinical encounter. J Relig Health. 2011 Dec; 50(4):806-17.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.280
  8. Attention to inpatients' religious and spiritual concerns: predictors and association with patient satisfaction. J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Nov; 26(11):1265-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.272
  9. Conscientious refusals to refer: findings from a national physician survey. J Med Ethics. 2011 Jul; 37(7):397-401.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.265
  10. Religious hospitals and primary care physicians: conflicts over policies for patient care. J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Jul; 25(7):725-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.250
  11. Autonomy, religion and clinical decisions: findings from a national physician survey. J Med Ethics. 2009 Apr; 35(4):214-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.233
  12. Religion, spirituality, and medicine: psychiatrists' and other physicians' differing observations, interpretations, and clinical approaches. Am J Psychiatry. 2007 Dec; 164(12):1825-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.212
  13. By intuitions differently formed: how physicians assess and respond to spiritual issues in the clinical encounter. Am J Bioeth. 2007 Jul; 7(7):19-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.206
  14. The association of physicians' religious characteristics with their attitudes and self-reported behaviors regarding religion and spirituality in the clinical encounter. Med Care. 2006 May; 44(5):446-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.190
  15. Strangers or friends? A proposal for a new spirituality-in-medicine ethic. J Gen Intern Med. 2005 Apr; 20(4):370-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.177
  16. When patients choose faith over medicine: physician perspectives on religiously related conflict in the medical encounter. Arch Intern Med. 2005 Jan 10; 165(1):88-91.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.174
  17. Is religious devotion relevant to the doctor-patient relationship? J Fam Pract. 2004 Aug; 53(8):632-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.169
  18. Physician Perspectives on Long-Term Relationships and Friendships with Patients: A National Assessment. South Med J. 2017 11; 110(11):679-684.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.106
  19. Physicians' Opinions on Engaging Patients' Religious and Spiritual Concerns: A National Survey. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 03; 55(3):897-905.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.106
  20. Courage and Compassion: Virtues in Caring for So-Called "Difficult" Patients. AMA J Ethics. 2017 Apr 01; 19(4):357-363.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.101
  21. Project on the Good Physician: A Proposal for a Moral Intuitionist Model of Virtuous Caring. Teach Learn Med. 2017 Jan-Mar; 29(1):75-84.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.097
  22. US Physicians Overwhelmingly Endorse Hospice as the Better Option for Most Patients at the End of Life. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2017 Jul; 34(6):556-558.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.094
  23. Limits and responsibilities of physicians addressing spiritual suffering in terminally ill patients. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2015 Mar; 49(3):562-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.084
  24. [Re]considering Respect for Persons in a Globalizing World. Dev World Bioeth. 2015 Aug; 15(2):98-106.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.083
  25. Providing guidance to patients: physicians' views about the relative responsibilities of doctors and religious communities. South Med J. 2013 Jul; 106(7):399-406.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.078
  26. A spiritual problem? Primary care physicians' and psychiatrists' interpretations of medically unexplained symptoms. J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Mar; 28(3):392-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.074
  27. What we don't talk about when we don't talk about sex: results of a national survey of U.S. obstetrician/gynecologists. J Sex Med. 2012 May; 9(5):1285-94.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.072
  28. An assessment of US physicians' training in religion, spirituality, and medicine. Med Teach. 2011; 33(11):944-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.066
  29. Moral controversy, directive counsel, and the doctor's role: findings from a national survey of obstetrician-gynecologists. Acad Med. 2010 Sep; 85(9):1475-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.064
  30. Obstetrician-gynecologist physicians' beliefs about emergency contraception: a national survey. Contraception. 2010 Oct; 82(4):324-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.064
  31. Spirituality and lifestyle: what clinicians need to know. South Med J. 2006 Oct; 99(10):1170-1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  32. Attitudes of paediatric and obstetric specialists towards prenatal surgery for lethal and non-lethal conditions. J Med Ethics. 2018 04; 44(4):234-238.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  33. Predictors of hospitalised patients' preferences for physician-directed medical decision-making. J Med Ethics. 2012 Feb; 38(2):77-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.