The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Martin Kreitman to Codon

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Martin Kreitman has written about Codon.
Connection Strength

0.763
  1. Coding sequence evolution. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1999 Dec; 9(6):637-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.176
  2. The nonrandom location of synonymous codons suggests that reading frame-independent forces have patterned codon preferences. J Mol Evol. 1999 Jul; 49(1):36-43.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.171
  3. The correlation between synonymous and nonsynonymous substitutions in Drosophila: mutation, selection or relaxed constraints? Genetics. 1998 Oct; 150(2):767-75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.163
  4. Intragenic spatial patterns of codon usage bias in prokaryotic and eukaryotic genomes. Genetics. 2004 Dec; 168(4):2245-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.062
  5. Population, evolutionary and genomic consequences of interference selection. Genetics. 2002 May; 161(1):389-410.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  6. The correlation between intron length and recombination in drosophila. Dynamic equilibrium between mutational and selective forces. Genetics. 2000 Nov; 156(3):1175-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  7. The molecular clock revisited: the rate of synonymous vs. replacement change in Drosophila. Genetica. 1998; 102-103(1-6):369-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  8. Unraveling selection in the mitochondrial genome of Drosophila. Genetics. 1994 Nov; 138(3):757-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  9. The population genetics of the origin and divergence of the Drosophila simulans complex species. Genetics. 2000 Dec; 156(4):1913-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  10. Nucleotide variation in the triosephosphate isomerase (Tpi) locus of Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. Mol Biol Evol. 1998 Jun; 15(6):756-69.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.