The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Martin Kreitman to Selection, Genetic

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Martin Kreitman has written about Selection, Genetic.
Connection Strength

1.833
  1. Does positive selection drive transcription factor binding site turnover? A test with Drosophila cis-regulatory modules. PLoS Genet. 2011 Apr; 7(4):e1002053.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.293
  2. Balancing claims for balancing selection. Trends Genet. 2004 Jul; 20(7):300-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.183
  3. A method for detecting recent selection in the human genome from allele age estimates. Genetics. 2003 Sep; 165(1):287-97.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.173
  4. Population, evolutionary and genomic consequences of interference selection. Genetics. 2002 May; 161(1):389-410.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.157
  5. Evidence for stabilizing selection in a eukaryotic enhancer element. Nature. 2000 Feb 03; 403(6769):564-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.135
  6. Methods to detect selection in populations with applications to the human. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2000; 1:539-59.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.134
  7. The neutral theory is dead. Long live the neutral theory. Bioessays. 1996 Aug; 18(8):678-83; discussion 683.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.106
  8. A population genetic test of selection at the molecular level. Science. 1995 Dec 01; 270(5241):1497-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.101
  9. Lack of polymorphism on the Drosophila fourth chromosome resulting from selection. Genetics. 1991 Dec; 129(4):1111-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.076
  10. Artificial selection on egg size perturbs early pattern formation in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution. 2011 Jan; 65(1):33-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.072
  11. Evolution and inheritance of early embryonic patterning in Drosophila simulans and D. sechellia. Evolution. 2011 May; 65(5):1388-99.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.072
  12. Natural selection for polymorphism in the disease resistance gene Rps2 of Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics. 2003 Feb; 163(2):735-46.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  13. Signature of balancing selection in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Aug 20; 99(17):11525-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  14. Coding sequence evolution. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1999 Dec; 9(6):637-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  15. Natural selection on synonymous sites is correlated with gene length and recombination in Drosophila. Genetics. 1999 Jan; 151(1):239-49.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  16. The correlation between synonymous and nonsynonymous substitutions in Drosophila: mutation, selection or relaxed constraints? Genetics. 1998 Oct; 150(2):767-75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  17. The molecular clock revisited: the rate of synonymous vs. replacement change in Drosophila. Genetica. 1998; 102-103(1-6):369-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  18. Reduced variation at concertina, a heterochromatic locus in Drosophila. Genet Res. 1996 Oct; 68(2):101-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  19. Shared Genetic Signals of Hypoxia Adaptation in Drosophila and in High-Altitude Human Populations. Mol Biol Evol. 2016 Feb; 33(2):501-17.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  20. Organization of genetic variation at the molecular level: lessons from Drosophila. EXS. 1994; 69:157-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  21. Low levels of polymorphism in genes that control the activation of defense response in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics. 2008 Apr; 178(4):2031-43.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  22. Molecular evolution of pathogenicity-island genes in Pseudomonas viridiflava. Genetics. 2007 Oct; 177(2):1031-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  23. A genome-wide survey of R gene polymorphisms in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2006 Aug; 18(8):1803-18.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  24. Fitness costs of R-gene-mediated resistance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature. 2003 May 01; 423(6935):74-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.