The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Victor Mor-Avi to Observer Variation

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Victor Mor-Avi has written about Observer Variation.
Connection Strength

1.544
  1. Deep learning assisted measurement of echocardiographic left heart parameters: improvement in interobserver variability and workflow efficiency. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2023 Dec; 39(12):2507-2516.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.207
  2. Contrast-enhanced echocardiographic measurement of longitudinal strain: accuracy and its relationship with image quality. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Mar; 36(3):431-439.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.157
  3. Semi-automated echocardiographic quantification of right ventricular size and function. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Aug; 31(6):1149-57.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.115
  4. Three-dimensional analysis of interventricular septal curvature from cardiac magnetic resonance images for the evaluation of patients with pulmonary hypertension. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Jun; 28(5):1073-85.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.088
  5. Reproducibility and inter-vendor variability of left ventricular deformation measurements by three-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2011 Aug; 24(8):878-85.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.088
  6. Real-time 3-dimensional echocardiographic quantification of left ventricular volumes: multicenter study for validation with magnetic resonance imaging and investigation of sources of error. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008 Jul; 1(4):413-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.072
  7. Color encoding of endocardial motion improves the interpretation of contrast-enhanced echocardiographic stress tests by less-experienced readers. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2006 Jan; 19(1):48-54.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.060
  8. Improved quantification of left ventricular volumes and mass based on endocardial and epicardial surface detection from cardiac MR images using level set models. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2005; 7(3):595-602.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  9. Fast measurement of left ventricular mass with real-time three-dimensional echocardiography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation. 2004 Sep 28; 110(13):1814-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  10. Objective assessment of left ventricular wall motion from contrast-enhanced power modulation images. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2002 Feb; 15(2):118-28.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  11. Normal values of regional left ventricular endocardial motion: multicenter color kinesis study. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2000 Nov; 279(5):H2464-76.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  12. A multi-vendor, multi-center study on reproducibility and comparability of fast strain-encoded cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 May; 36(5):899-911.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  13. Echocardiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance based evaluation of myocardial strain and relationship with late gadolinium enhancement. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2019 08 08; 21(1):46.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  14. First Clinical Experience With 3-Dimensional Echocardiographic Transillumination Rendering. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 09; 12(9):1868-1871.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  15. 3-Dimensional Echocardiographic Analysis of the Tricuspid Annulus Provides New Insights Into Tricuspid Valve Geometry and Dynamics. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 03; 12(3):401-412.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  16. Transthoracic 3D Echocardiographic Left Heart Chamber Quantification Using an Automated Adaptive Analytics Algorithm. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 07; 9(7):769-782.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  17. Screening for Outflow Cannula Malfunction of Left Ventricular Assist Devices (LVADs) With the Use of Doppler Echocardiography: New LVAD-Specific Reference Values for Contemporary Devices. J Card Fail. 2016 Oct; 22(10):808-14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  18. Simultaneous Longitudinal Strain in All 4 Cardiac Chambers: A Novel Method for Comprehensive Functional Assessment of the Heart. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Mar; 9(3):e003895.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  19. Leaflet-chordal relations in patients with primary and secondary mitral regurgitation. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015 Nov; 28(11):1302-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  20. Novel Approach to Three-Dimensional Echocardiographic Quantification of Right Ventricular Volumes and Function from Focused Views. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015 Oct; 28(10):1222-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  21. Right ventricular strain in pulmonary arterial hypertension: a 2D echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance study. Echocardiography. 2015 Feb; 32(2):257-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  22. Noninvasive quantification of left ventricular elastance and ventricular-arterial coupling using three-dimensional echocardiography and arterial tonometry. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2011 Nov; 301(5):H1916-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  23. A three-dimensional insight into the complexity of flow convergence in mitral regurgitation: adjunctive benefit of anatomic regurgitant orifice area. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2011 Sep; 301(3):H1015-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  24. Characterization of degenerative mitral valve disease using morphologic analysis of real-time three-dimensional echocardiographic images: objective insight into complexity and planning of mitral valve repair. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011 Jan; 4(1):24-32.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  25. Multimodality comparison of quantitative volumetric analysis of the right ventricle. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010 Jan; 3(1):10-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  26. Real-time 3-dimensional echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular dyssynchrony: pitfalls in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009 Jul; 2(7):802-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  27. Quantification of left ventricular volumes using three-dimensional echocardiographic speckle tracking: comparison with MRI. Eur Heart J. 2009 Jul; 30(13):1565-73.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  28. Quantitative assessment of left ventricular volume and ejection fraction using two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2009 Jan; 10(1):82-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  29. Rapid online quantification of left ventricular volume from real-time three-dimensional echocardiographic data. Eur Heart J. 2006 Feb; 27(4):460-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  30. Improved semiautomated quantification of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction using 3-dimensional echocardiography with a full matrix-array transducer: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2005 Aug; 18(8):779-88.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  31. Improved quantification of left ventricular mass based on endocardial and epicardial surface detection with real time three dimensional echocardiography. Heart. 2006 Feb; 92(2):213-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  32. Harmonic imaging for endocardial visualization and myocardial contrast echocardiography during transesophageal echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2004 Jan; 17(1):10-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  33. Accuracy of mitral valve area measurements using transthoracic rapid freehand 3-dimensional scanning: comparison with noninvasive and invasive methods. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2003 Dec; 16(12):1292-300.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  34. The role of echocardiographic harmonic imaging and contrast enhancement for improvement of endocardial border delineation. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2000 Feb; 13(2):131-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  35. Effects of MPEG compression on the quality and diagnostic accuracy of digital echocardiography studies. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2000 Jan; 13(1):51-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.