Robert Nishikawa to Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Robert Nishikawa has written about Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted.
Connection Strength
3.034
-
Importance of Better Human-Computer Interaction in the Era of Deep Learning: Mammography Computer-Aided Diagnosis as a Use Case. J Am Coll Radiol. 2018 01; 15(1 Pt A):49-52.
Score: 0.507
-
Point/counterpoint: computer-aided detection should be used routinely to assist screening mammogram interpretation. Med Phys. 2012 Sep; 39(9):5305-7.
Score: 0.354
-
Clinically missed cancer: how effectively can radiologists use computer-aided detection? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Mar; 198(3):708-16.
Score: 0.342
-
Computer-aided detection evaluation methods are not created equal. Radiology. 2009 Jun; 251(3):634-6.
Score: 0.283
-
Computer-aided detection and diagnosis of breast cancer. Radiol Clin North Am. 2000 Jul; 38(4):725-40.
Score: 0.152
-
Computer-aided diagnosis complements full-field digital mammography. Diagn Imaging (San Franc). 1999 Sep; 21(9):47-51, 75.
Score: 0.144
-
Optimization and FROC analysis of rule-based detection schemes using a multiobjective approach. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1998 Dec; 17(6):1089-93.
Score: 0.137
-
Optimal reconstruction and quantitative image features for computer-aided diagnosis tools for breast CT. Med Phys. 2017 May; 44(5):1846-1856.
Score: 0.122
-
Effect of case selection on the performance of computer-aided detection schemes. Med Phys. 1994 Feb; 21(2):265-9.
Score: 0.098
-
Estimating sensitivity and specificity for technology assessment based on observer studies. Acad Radiol. 2013 Jul; 20(7):825-30.
Score: 0.093
-
Computerized detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms: applications of artificial neural networks. Med Phys. 1992 May-Jun; 19(3):555-60.
Score: 0.087
-
Independent evaluation of computer classification of malignant and benign calcifications in full-field digital mammograms. Acad Radiol. 2007 Mar; 14(3):363-70.
Score: 0.060
-
Computerized mass detection for digital breast tomosynthesis directly from the projection images. Med Phys. 2006 Feb; 33(2):482-91.
Score: 0.056
-
Comparison of independent double readings and computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) for the diagnosis of breast calcifications. Acad Radiol. 2006 Jan; 13(1):84-94.
Score: 0.056
-
Computerized detection of mass lesions in digital breast tomosynthesis images using two- and three dimensional radial gradient index segmentation. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2004 Oct; 3(5):437-41.
Score: 0.051
-
Independent versus sequential reading in ROC studies of computer-assist modalities: analysis of components of variance. Acad Radiol. 2002 Sep; 9(9):1036-43.
Score: 0.044
-
Developing breast lesion detection algorithms for digital breast tomosynthesis: Leveraging false positive findings. Med Phys. 2022 Dec; 49(12):7596-7608.
Score: 0.044
-
Potential of computer-aided diagnosis to reduce variability in radiologists' interpretations of mammograms depicting microcalcifications. Radiology. 2001 Sep; 220(3):787-94.
Score: 0.041
-
Dependence of computer classification of clustered microcalcifications on the correct detection of microcalcifications. Med Phys. 2001 Sep; 28(9):1949-57.
Score: 0.041
-
Computer-aided diagnosis in radiology: potential and pitfalls. Eur J Radiol. 1999 Aug; 31(2):97-109.
Score: 0.036
-
Improving breast cancer diagnosis with computer-aided diagnosis. Acad Radiol. 1999 Jan; 6(1):22-33.
Score: 0.034
-
A genetic algorithm-based method for optimizing the performance of a computer-aided diagnosis scheme for detection of clustered microcalcifications in mammograms. Med Phys. 1998 Sep; 25(9):1613-20.
Score: 0.034
-
Optimally weighted wavelet transform based on supervised training for detection of microcalcifications in digital mammograms. Med Phys. 1998 Jun; 25(6):949-56.
Score: 0.033
-
Quantitative comparison of clustered microcalcifications in for-presentation and for-processing mammograms in full-field digital mammography. Med Phys. 2017 Jul; 44(7):3726-3738.
Score: 0.031
-
A computational model to generate simulated three-dimensional breast masses. Med Phys. 2015 Feb; 42(2):1098-118.
Score: 0.026
-
Potential usefulness of digital imaging in clinical diagnostic radiology: computer-aided diagnosis. J Digit Imaging. 1995 Feb; 8(1 Suppl 1):2-7.
Score: 0.026
-
Clinical use of digital mammography: the present and the prospects. J Digit Imaging. 1995 Feb; 8(1 Suppl 1):74-9.
Score: 0.026
-
Automated segmentation of digitized mammograms. Acad Radiol. 1995 Jan; 2(1):1-9.
Score: 0.026
-
Computerized detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms using a shift-invariant artificial neural network. Med Phys. 1994 Apr; 21(4):517-24.
Score: 0.025
-
Digital radiography. A useful clinical tool for computer-aided diagnosis by quantitative analysis of radiographic images. Acta Radiol. 1993 Sep; 34(5):426-39.
Score: 0.024