Robert Nishikawa to Mammography
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Robert Nishikawa has written about Mammography.
Connection Strength
10.373
-
Locally adaptive decision in detection of clustered microcalcifications in mammograms. Phys Med Biol. 2018 02 15; 63(4):045014.
Score: 0.502
-
Importance of Better Human-Computer Interaction in the Era of Deep Learning: Mammography Computer-Aided Diagnosis as a Use Case. J Am Coll Radiol. 2018 01; 15(1 Pt A):49-52.
Score: 0.492
-
CADe for early detection of breast cancer-current status and why we need to continue to explore new approaches. Acad Radiol. 2014 Oct; 21(10):1320-1.
Score: 0.393
-
Estimating sensitivity and specificity for technology assessment based on observer studies. Acad Radiol. 2013 Jul; 20(7):825-30.
Score: 0.361
-
Point/counterpoint: computer-aided detection should be used routinely to assist screening mammogram interpretation. Med Phys. 2012 Sep; 39(9):5305-7.
Score: 0.344
-
A comparison study of image features between FFDM and film mammogram images. Med Phys. 2012 Jul; 39(7):4386-94.
Score: 0.340
-
Clinically missed cancer: how effectively can radiologists use computer-aided detection? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Mar; 198(3):708-16.
Score: 0.332
-
Retrieval boosted computer-aided diagnosis of clustered microcalcifications for breast cancer. Med Phys. 2012 Feb; 39(2):676-85.
Score: 0.330
-
Re: effectiveness of computer-aided detection in community mammography practice. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012 Jan 04; 104(1):77; author reply 78-9.
Score: 0.328
-
On the orientation of mammographic structure. Med Phys. 2011 Oct; 38(10):5303-6.
Score: 0.323
-
Detection of clustered microcalcifications using spatial point process modeling. Phys Med Biol. 2011 Jan 07; 56(1):1-17.
Score: 0.305
-
Comparison of power spectra for tomosynthesis projections and reconstructed images. Med Phys. 2009 May; 36(5):1753-8.
Score: 0.273
-
Comparison of soft-copy and hard-copy reading for full-field digital mammography. Radiology. 2009 Apr; 251(1):41-9.
Score: 0.271
-
Computer-aided screening mammography. N Engl J Med. 2007 Jul 05; 357(1):84; author reply 85.
Score: 0.241
-
Current status and future directions of computer-aided diagnosis in mammography. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2007 Jun-Jul; 31(4-5):224-35.
Score: 0.236
-
Identification of simulated microcalcifications in white noise and mammographic backgrounds. Med Phys. 2006 Aug; 33(8):2905-11.
Score: 0.226
-
Computer-aided detection, in its present form, is not an effective aid for screening mammography. For the proposition. Med Phys. 2006 Apr; 33(4):811-2.
Score: 0.220
-
Radial gradient-based segmentation of mammographic microcalcifications: observer evaluation and effect on CAD performance. Med Phys. 2004 Sep; 31(9):2648-57.
Score: 0.198
-
Improving lesion detection in mammograms by leveraging a Cycle-GAN-based lesion remover. Breast Cancer Res. 2024 02 01; 26(1):21.
Score: 0.190
-
Estimating three-class ideal observer decision variables for computerized detection and classification of mammographic mass lesions. Med Phys. 2004 Jan; 31(1):81-90.
Score: 0.189
-
AI in Screening Mammography: Use One Radiologist and Improve Double Reads. Radiology. 2023 11; 309(2):e232964.
Score: 0.186
-
The use of a priori information in the detection of mammographic microcalcifications to improve their classification. Med Phys. 2003 May; 30(5):823-31.
Score: 0.180
-
A support vector machine approach for detection of microcalcifications. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2002 Dec; 21(12):1552-63.
Score: 0.175
-
Identifying Women With Mammographically- Occult Breast Cancer Leveraging GAN-Simulated Mammograms. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2022 01; 41(1):225-236.
Score: 0.164
-
Computer-aided detection and diagnosis of breast cancer. Radiol Clin North Am. 2000 Jul; 38(4):725-40.
Score: 0.148
-
Computer-aided diagnosis complements full-field digital mammography. Diagn Imaging (San Franc). 1999 Sep; 21(9):47-51, 75.
Score: 0.140
-
Linkage of the ACR National Mammography Database to the Network of State Cancer Registries: Proof of Concept Evaluation by the ACR National Mammography Database Committee. J Am Coll Radiol. 2019 Jan; 16(1):8-14.
Score: 0.130
-
Quantitative comparison of clustered microcalcifications in for-presentation and for-processing mammograms in full-field digital mammography. Med Phys. 2017 Jul; 44(7):3726-3738.
Score: 0.120
-
Comment on "Quantitative classification of breast tumors in digitized mammograms" [Med. Phys. 23, 1337-1345 (1996)]. Med Phys. 1997 Feb; 24(2):313, 315.
Score: 0.117
-
Comparison of eye position versus computer identified microcalcification clusters on mammograms. Med Phys. 1997 Jan; 24(1):17-23.
Score: 0.116
-
Improving the accuracy in detection of clustered microcalcifications with a context-sensitive classification model. Med Phys. 2016 Jan; 43(1):159.
Score: 0.108
-
Local curvature analysis for classifying breast tumors: Preliminary analysis in dedicated breast CT. Med Phys. 2015 Sep; 42(9):5479-89.
Score: 0.106
-
Computer-aided detection of clustered microcalcifications on digital mammograms. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1995 Mar; 33(2):174-8.
Score: 0.102
-
Computerized detection of clustered microcalcifications: evaluation of performance on mammograms from multiple centers. Radiographics. 1995 Mar; 15(2):443-52.
Score: 0.102
-
Clinical use of digital mammography: the present and the prospects. J Digit Imaging. 1995 Feb; 8(1 Suppl 1):74-9.
Score: 0.102
-
A computational model to generate simulated three-dimensional breast masses. Med Phys. 2015 Feb; 42(2):1098-118.
Score: 0.102
-
Using breast radiographers' reports as a second opinion for radiologists' readings of microcalcifications in digital mammography. Br J Radiol. 2015 Mar; 88(1047):20140565.
Score: 0.101
-
Analysis of perceived similarity between pairs of microcalcification clusters in mammograms. Med Phys. 2014 May; 41(5):051904.
Score: 0.096
-
Effect of case selection on the performance of computer-aided detection schemes. Med Phys. 1994 Feb; 21(2):265-9.
Score: 0.095
-
Computer-aided detection of clustered microcalcifications: an improved method for grouping detected signals. Med Phys. 1993 Nov-Dec; 20(6):1661-6.
Score: 0.093
-
Algorithmic scatter correction in dual-energy digital mammography. Med Phys. 2013 Nov; 40(11):111919.
Score: 0.093
-
Validation of a power-law noise model for simulating small-scale breast tissue. Phys Med Biol. 2013 Sep 07; 58(17):6011-27.
Score: 0.092
-
Stereoscopic digital mammography: improved specificity and reduced rate of recall in a prospective clinical trial. Radiology. 2013 Jan; 266(1):81-8.
Score: 0.087
-
Assessing the stand-alone sensitivity of computer-aided detection with cancer cases from the Digital Mammographic Imaging Screening Trial. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Sep; 199(3):W392-401.
Score: 0.086
-
A statistically defined anthropomorphic software breast phantom. Med Phys. 2012 Jun; 39(6):3375-85.
Score: 0.085
-
Computerized detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms: applications of artificial neural networks. Med Phys. 1992 May-Jun; 19(3):555-60.
Score: 0.084
-
Automated detection of mass lesions in dedicated breast CT: a preliminary study. Med Phys. 2012 Feb; 39(2):866-73.
Score: 0.083
-
Enhanced imaging of microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis through improved image-reconstruction algorithms. Med Phys. 2009 Nov; 36(11):4920-32.
Score: 0.071
-
Computer-aided detection evaluation methods are not created equal. Radiology. 2009 Jun; 251(3):634-6.
Score: 0.069
-
Automated detection of microcalcification clusters for digital breast tomosynthesis using projection data only: a preliminary study. Med Phys. 2008 Apr; 35(4):1486-93.
Score: 0.063
-
Scanned-projection digital mammography. Med Phys. 1987 Sep-Oct; 14(5):717-27.
Score: 0.061
-
Independent evaluation of computer classification of malignant and benign calcifications in full-field digital mammograms. Acad Radiol. 2007 Mar; 14(3):363-70.
Score: 0.059
-
Computerized mass detection for digital breast tomosynthesis directly from the projection images. Med Phys. 2006 Feb; 33(2):482-91.
Score: 0.054
-
Signal-to-noise properties of mammographic film-screen systems. Med Phys. 1985 Jan-Feb; 12(1):32-9.
Score: 0.051
-
Computerized detection of mass lesions in digital breast tomosynthesis images using two- and three dimensional radial gradient index segmentation. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2004 Oct; 3(5):437-41.
Score: 0.050
-
A similarity learning approach to content-based image retrieval: application to digital mammography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2004 Oct; 23(10):1233-44.
Score: 0.050
-
Standalone AI for Breast Cancer Detection at Screening Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Radiology. 2023 06; 307(5):e222639.
Score: 0.045
-
Use of Artificial Intelligence for Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening: A Preliminary Real-world Experience. J Breast Imaging. 2023 May 22; 5(3):258-266.
Score: 0.045
-
Developing breast lesion detection algorithms for digital breast tomosynthesis: Leveraging false positive findings. Med Phys. 2022 Dec; 49(12):7596-7608.
Score: 0.043
-
Potential of computer-aided diagnosis to reduce variability in radiologists' interpretations of mammograms depicting microcalcifications. Radiology. 2001 Sep; 220(3):787-94.
Score: 0.040
-
Radiologists' preferences for digital mammographic display. The International Digital Mammography Development Group. Radiology. 2000 Sep; 216(3):820-30.
Score: 0.037
-
Computer-aided diagnosis in radiology: potential and pitfalls. Eur J Radiol. 1999 Aug; 31(2):97-109.
Score: 0.035
-
Improving breast cancer diagnosis with computer-aided diagnosis. Acad Radiol. 1999 Jan; 6(1):22-33.
Score: 0.033
-
A genetic algorithm-based method for optimizing the performance of a computer-aided diagnosis scheme for detection of clustered microcalcifications in mammograms. Med Phys. 1998 Sep; 25(9):1613-20.
Score: 0.033
-
Analysis of methods for reducing false positives in the automated detection of clustered microcalcifications in mammograms. Med Phys. 1998 Aug; 25(8):1502-6.
Score: 0.032
-
Optimally weighted wavelet transform based on supervised training for detection of microcalcifications in digital mammograms. Med Phys. 1998 Jun; 25(6):949-56.
Score: 0.032
-
Estimating the Accuracy Level Among Individual Detections in Clustered Microcalcifications. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2017 05; 36(5):1162-1171.
Score: 0.029
-
Density correction of peripheral breast tissue on digital mammograms. Radiographics. 1996 Nov; 16(6):1403-11.
Score: 0.029
-
An improved computer-assisted diagnostic scheme using wavelet transform for detecting clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms. Acad Radiol. 1996 Aug; 3(8):621-7.
Score: 0.028
-
An improved shift-invariant artificial neural network for computerized detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms. Med Phys. 1996 Apr; 23(4):595-601.
Score: 0.028
-
Malignant and benign clustered microcalcifications: automated feature analysis and classification. Radiology. 1996 Mar; 198(3):671-8.
Score: 0.027
-
Image feature analysis and computer-aided diagnosis in mammography: reduction of false-positive clustered microcalcifications using local edge-gradient analysis. Med Phys. 1995 Feb; 22(2):161-9.
Score: 0.025
-
Automated segmentation of digitized mammograms. Acad Radiol. 1995 Jan; 2(1):1-9.
Score: 0.025
-
Computerized detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms using a shift-invariant artificial neural network. Med Phys. 1994 Apr; 21(4):517-24.
Score: 0.024
-
Computer-aided diagnosis: development of automated schemes for quantitative analysis of radiographic images. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 1992 Apr; 13(2):140-52.
Score: 0.021
-
Anthropomorphic radiologic phantoms. Radiology. 1986 Feb; 158(2):550-2.
Score: 0.014
-
Comparison of independent double readings and computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) for the diagnosis of breast calcifications. Acad Radiol. 2006 Jan; 13(1):84-94.
Score: 0.014
-
Dependence of computer classification of clustered microcalcifications on the correct detection of microcalcifications. Med Phys. 2001 Sep; 28(9):1949-57.
Score: 0.010
-
Potential usefulness of digital imaging in clinical diagnostic radiology: computer-aided diagnosis. J Digit Imaging. 1995 Feb; 8(1 Suppl 1):2-7.
Score: 0.006
-
An "intelligent" workstation for computer-aided diagnosis. Radiographics. 1993 May; 13(3):647-56.
Score: 0.006