Robert Nishikawa to Observer Variation
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Robert Nishikawa has written about Observer Variation.
Connection Strength
0.375
-
Estimating sensitivity and specificity for technology assessment based on observer studies. Acad Radiol. 2013 Jul; 20(7):825-30.
Score: 0.100
-
The hypervolume under the ROC hypersurface of "near-guessing" and "near-perfect" observers in N-class classification tasks. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2005 Mar; 24(3):293-9.
Score: 0.057
-
Radial gradient-based segmentation of mammographic microcalcifications: observer evaluation and effect on CAD performance. Med Phys. 2004 Sep; 31(9):2648-57.
Score: 0.055
-
Estimating three-class ideal observer decision variables for computerized detection and classification of mammographic mass lesions. Med Phys. 2004 Jan; 31(1):81-90.
Score: 0.053
-
Potential of computer-aided diagnosis to reduce variability in radiologists' interpretations of mammograms depicting microcalcifications. Radiology. 2001 Sep; 220(3):787-94.
Score: 0.045
-
Comparison of eye position versus computer identified microcalcification clusters on mammograms. Med Phys. 1997 Jan; 24(1):17-23.
Score: 0.032
-
Comparison of independent double readings and computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) for the diagnosis of breast calcifications. Acad Radiol. 2006 Jan; 13(1):84-94.
Score: 0.015
-
Improving breast cancer diagnosis with computer-aided diagnosis. Acad Radiol. 1999 Jan; 6(1):22-33.
Score: 0.009
-
Analysis of methods for reducing false positives in the automated detection of clustered microcalcifications in mammograms. Med Phys. 1998 Aug; 25(8):1502-6.
Score: 0.009