The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Richard Schilsky to Treatment Outcome

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Richard Schilsky has written about Treatment Outcome.
Richard Schilsky
Connection Strength
0.685
Treatment Outcome
  1. Updating the American Society of Clinical Oncology Value Framework: Revisions and Reflections in Response to Comments Received. J Clin Oncol. 2016 08 20; 34(24):2925-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.058
  2. Modernizing Eligibility Criteria for Molecularly Driven Trials. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Sep 01; 33(25):2815-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  3. Drivers of change in cancer care. J Oncol Pract. 2014 Sep; 10(5):315-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  4. Progress against GI cancer during the American Society of Clinical Oncology's first 50 years. J Clin Oncol. 2014 May 20; 32(15):1521-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  5. Precision cancer medicine: the future is now, only better. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2014; 61-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  6. Clinical trials in the era of personalized oncology. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011 Nov-Dec; 61(6):365-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  7. 3rd EORTC-NCI International Meeting on Cancer Molecular Markers: From Discovery to Clinical Practice. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2004 Jul; 4(4):431-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  8. Oral capecitabine vs intravenous 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin: integrated efficacy data and novel analyses from two large, randomised, phase III trials. Br J Cancer. 2004 Mar 22; 90(6):1190-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  9. Randomized, open-label, phase III study of a 28-day oral regimen of eniluracil plus fluorouracil versus intravenous fluorouracil plus leucovorin as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic/advanced colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2002 Mar 15; 20(6):1519-26.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  10. Dose-escalating study of capecitabine plus gemcitabine combination therapy in patients with advanced cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2002 Jan 15; 20(2):582-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  11. Oral fluoropyrimidine treatment of colorectal cancer. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2001 Aug; 1(2):95-103.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  12. What can heart failure trialists learn from oncology trialists? Eur Heart J. 2021 06 21; 42(24):2373-2383.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  13. Impact of Broadening Trial Eligibility Criteria for Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Real-World Analysis of Select ASCO-Friends Recommendations. Clin Cancer Res. 2021 05 01; 27(9):2430-2434.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  14. A multicenter phase II study of a five-day regimen of oral 5-fluorouracil plus eniluracil with or without leucovorin in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol. 2000 Apr; 11(4):415-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  15. The promise of Immuno-oncology: implications for defining the value of cancer treatment. J Immunother Cancer. 2019 05 17; 7(1):129.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  16. Improving Cancer Diagnosis and Care: Patient Access to Oncologic Imaging Expertise. J Clin Oncol. 2019 07 10; 37(20):1690-1694.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  17. Trial Reporting in Immuno-Oncology (TRIO): an American society of clinical oncology-society for immunotherapy of cancer statement. J Immunother Cancer. 2018 10 19; 6(1):108.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  18. Consensus statement on essential patient characteristics in systemic treatment trials for metastatic colorectal cancer: Supported by the ARCAD Group. Eur J Cancer. 2018 09; 100:35-45.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  19. Effect of First-Line Chemotherapy Combined With Cetuximab or Bevacizumab on Overall Survival in Patients With KRAS Wild-Type Advanced or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2017 06 20; 317(23):2392-2401.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  20. Association of Biomarker-Based Treatment Strategies With Response Rates and Progression-Free Survival in Refractory Malignant Neoplasms: A Meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol. 2016 Nov 01; 2(11):1452-1459.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  21. American Society of Clinical Oncology perspective: Raising the bar for clinical trials by defining clinically meaningful outcomes. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Apr 20; 32(12):1277-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  22. Evaluation of food effect on pharmacokinetics of vismodegib in advanced solid tumor patients. Clin Cancer Res. 2013 Jun 01; 19(11):3059-67.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  23. A Cancer and Leukemia Group B phase II study of sunitinib malate in patients with previously treated metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (CALGB 80603). Oncologist. 2010; 15(12):1310-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  24. Adjuvant paclitaxel plus carboplatin compared with observation in stage IB non-small-cell lung cancer: CALGB 9633 with the Cancer and Leukemia Group B, Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, and North Central Cancer Treatment Group Study Groups. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Nov 01; 26(31):5043-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  25. A phase II prospective multi-institutional trial of adjuvant active specific immunotherapy following curative resection of colorectal cancer hepatic metastases: cancer and leukemia group B study 89903. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 Jan; 15(1):158-64.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  26. Prospective, randomized comparison of high-dose chemotherapy with stem-cell support versus intermediate-dose chemotherapy after surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy in women with high-risk primary breast cancer: a report of CALGB 9082, SWOG 9114, and NCIC MA-13. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Apr 01; 23(10):2191-200.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  27. A phase I study of the oral combination of CI-994, a putative histone deacetylase inhibitor, and capecitabine. Ann Oncol. 2004 Nov; 15(11):1705-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  28. Improved outcomes from adding sequential Paclitaxel but not from escalating Doxorubicin dose in an adjuvant chemotherapy regimen for patients with node-positive primary breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2003 Mar 15; 21(6):976-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  29. Randomized trial of dose-dense versus conventionally scheduled and sequential versus concurrent combination chemotherapy as postoperative adjuvant treatment of node-positive primary breast cancer: first report of Intergroup Trial C9741/Cancer and Leukemia Group B Trial 9741. J Clin Oncol. 2003 Apr 15; 21(8):1431-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  30. A phase I trial of escalating doses of trastuzumab combined with daily subcutaneous interleukin 2: report of cancer and leukemia group B 9661. Clin Cancer Res. 2002 Dec; 8(12):3718-27.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  31. Phase I study to evaluate multiple regimens of intravenous 5-fluorouracil administered in combination with weekly gemcitabine in patients with advanced solid tumors: a potential broadly active regimen for advanced solid tumor malignancies. Cancer. 2001 Sep 15; 92(6):1567-76.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  32. Multicenter phase II study to evaluate a 28-day regimen of oral fluorouracil plus eniluracil in the treatment of patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2000 Aug; 18(15):2894-901.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  33. Phase II trial of uracil/tegafur (UFT) plus leucovorin in patients with advanced biliary carcinoma. Invest New Drugs. 1999; 17(1):97-101.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  34. Phase II trial of uracil/tegafur (UFT) plus leucovorin in patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma: a University of Chicago phase II consortium study. Ann Oncol. 1998 Sep; 9(9):1035-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  35. MOPP/ABV hybrid chemotherapy for advanced Hodgkin's disease significantly improves failure-free and overall survival: the 8-year results of the intergroup trial. J Clin Oncol. 1998 Jan; 16(1):19-26.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  36. Phase I study of adozelesin administered by 24-hour continuous intravenous infusion. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1994 Mar 02; 86(5):368-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.