The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Richard Schilsky to Reproducibility of Results

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Richard Schilsky has written about Reproducibility of Results.
Connection Strength

0.286
  1. Development and Validation of a Natural Language Processing Tool to Generate the CONSORT Reporting Checklist for Randomized Clinical Trials. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 10 01; 3(10):e2014661.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.120
  2. Translating the cancer genome into clinically useful tools and strategies. Dis Model Mech. 2009 Sep-Oct; 2(9-10):426-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  3. Comparative Assessment of Clinical Benefit Using the ESMO-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale Version 1.1 and the ASCO Value Framework Net Health Benefit Score. J Clin Oncol. 2019 02 01; 37(4):336-349.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  4. Leveraging biospecimen resources for discovery or validation of markers for early cancer detection. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Apr; 107(4).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  5. Breaking a vicious cycle. Sci Transl Med. 2013 Jul 31; 5(196):196cm6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  6. Measuring clinically significant chemotherapy-related toxicities using Medicare claims from Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) trial participants. Med Care. 2008 Mar; 46(3):303-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  7. FDG-PET lymphoma demonstration project invitational workshop. Acad Radiol. 2007 Mar; 14(3):330-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  8. Criterion validity of Medicare chemotherapy claims in Cancer and Leukemia Group B breast and lung cancer trial participants. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005 Jul 20; 97(14):1080-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  9. Progress and promise of FDG-PET imaging for cancer patient management and oncologic drug development. Clin Cancer Res. 2005 Apr 15; 11(8):2785-808.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.