Robert Lacy to Conservation of Natural Resources
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Robert Lacy has written about Conservation of Natural Resources.
Connection Strength
4.842
-
Lessons from 30 years of population viability analysis of wildlife populations. Zoo Biol. 2019 Jan; 38(1):67-77.
Score: 0.638
-
Evaluating anthropogenic threats to endangered killer whales to inform effective recovery plans. Sci Rep. 2017 10 26; 7(1):14119.
Score: 0.588
-
Use of animals with partially known ancestries in scientifically managed breeding programs. Zoo Biol. 2016 Jul; 35(4):319-25.
Score: 0.533
-
Developing metapopulation connectivity criteria from genetic and habitat data to recover the endangered Mexican wolf. Conserv Biol. 2014 Feb; 28(1):76-86.
Score: 0.443
-
Achieving true sustainability of zoo populations. Zoo Biol. 2013 Jan-Feb; 32(1):19-26.
Score: 0.407
-
Extending pedigree analysis for uncertain parentage and diverse breeding systems. J Hered. 2012 Mar-Apr; 103(2):197-205.
Score: 0.395
-
A comparison of strategies for selecting breeding pairs to maximize genetic diversity retention in managed populations. J Hered. 2012 Mar-Apr; 103(2):186-96.
Score: 0.394
-
Strategies for establishing and using genome resource banks to protect genetic diversity in conservation breeding programs. Zoo Biol. 2023 Mar; 42(2):175-184.
Score: 0.207
-
A stochastic model for estimating sustainable limits to wildlife mortality in a changing world. Conserv Biol. 2022 08; 36(4):e13897.
Score: 0.201
-
Climate change complicates efforts to ensure survival and recovery of St. Lawrence Estuary beluga. Mar Pollut Bull. 2021 Dec; 173(Pt B):113096.
Score: 0.194
-
Applying the zoo model to conservation of threatened exceptional plant species. Conserv Biol. 2020 12; 34(6):1416-1425.
Score: 0.177
-
Biological and Sociopolitical Sources of Uncertainty in Population Viability Analysis for Endangered Species Recovery Planning. Sci Rep. 2019 07 12; 9(1):10130.
Score: 0.166
-
Inbreeding and selection shape genomic diversity in captive populations: Implications for the conservation of endangered species. PLoS One. 2017; 12(4):e0175996.
Score: 0.142
-
What to do when we can't bank on seeds: What botanic gardens can learn from the zoo community about conserving plants in living collections. Am J Bot. 2016 09; 103(9):1541-3.
Score: 0.136
-
Predicting the probability of outbreeding depression. Conserv Biol. 2011 Jun; 25(3):465-75.
Score: 0.093
-
Methods and prospects for using molecular data in captive breeding programs: an empirical example using parma wallabies (Macropus parma). J Hered. 2009 Jul-Aug; 100(4):441-54.
Score: 0.082
-
The impacts of inbreeding, drift and selection on genetic diversity in captive breeding populations. Mol Ecol. 2015 Jan; 24(1):98-110.
Score: 0.030
-
Biodiversity. Confronting amphibian declines and extinctions. Science. 2006 Jul 07; 313(5783):48.
Score: 0.017