The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Sandeep Gurbuxani to Retrospective Studies

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Sandeep Gurbuxani has written about Retrospective Studies.
Connection Strength

0.106
  1. Socioeconomic determinants of the biology and outcomes of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in adults. Blood Adv. 2024 01 09; 8(1):164-171.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  2. Therapy-related myeloid neoplasms with normal karyotype show distinct genomic and clinical characteristics compared to their counterparts with abnormal karyotype. Br J Haematol. 2022 06; 197(6):736-744.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  3. Comparison of myeloid neoplasms with nonclassic 3q26.2/MECOM versus classic inv(3)/t(3;3) rearrangements reveals diverse clinicopathologic features, genetic profiles, and molecular mechanisms of MECOM activation. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2022 02; 61(2):71-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  4. Immune Reconstitution Following Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with High-Risk Neuroblastoma at the Time of Immunotherapy. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2018 03; 24(3):452-459.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  5. Peripheral T-cell lymphomas of follicular helper T-cell type frequently display an aberrant CD3(-/dim)CD4(+) population by flow cytometry: an important clue to the diagnosis of a Hodgkin lymphoma mimic. Mod Pathol. 2016 10; 29(10):1173-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  6. A novel clofarabine bridge strategy facilitates allogeneic transplantation in patients with relapsed/refractory leukemia and high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013 Nov; 48(11):1437-43.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  7. High dose cytarabine and mitoxantrone: an effective induction regimen for high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Leuk Lymphoma. 2012 Mar; 53(3):445-50.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.