The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Michael Ujiki to Middle Aged

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Michael Ujiki has written about Middle Aged.
Connection Strength

2.662
  1. Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)-associated chronic cough: long-term outcomes and predictors of response to anti-reflux surgery. Surg Endosc. 2026 Sep; 40(9):8094-8104.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.059
  2. Nissen versus Toupet fundoplication quality-of-life outcomes compared by intraoperative EndoFLIP™ distensibility index range. Surg Endosc. 2026 Aug; 40(8):6966-6971.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.059
  3. Hiatal hernia size predicts abnormal pH testing: a retrospective cohort study. Surg Endosc. 2026 Jul; 40(7):6293-6300.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.058
  4. The utility of routine pH studies after antireflux surgery. Surgery. 2026 Sep; 197:110151.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.058
  5. Extended venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after bariatric surgery does not increase postoperative bleeding complications. Surgery. 2026 Mar; 191:109918.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  6. Ideal impedance planimetry (EndoFLIP) distensibility ranges for male and female patients undergoing laparoscopic fundoplication. Surgery. 2026 Mar; 191:109903.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  7. Long-term outcomes of Zenker's peroral endoscopic myotomy: endoscopic suturing is effective for large Zenker's diverticula. Surg Endosc. 2025 Oct; 39(10):6765-6772.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  8. Can intraoperative impedance planimetry (EndoFLIP™) during anti-reflux surgery replace preoperative manometry with no difference in patient outcomes? Surg Endosc. 2025 Oct; 39(10):6756-6764.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  9. Decision regret for patients undergoing laparoscopic Heller myotomy and peroral endoscopic myotomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2025 09; 29(9):102141.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  10. Preoperative Biomarkers and Thromboelastometry According to Caprini Venous Thromboembolism Risk Stratification in Bariatric Patients: Are Clinical Risk Assessments Enough? J Am Coll Surg. 2025 Jul 01; 241(1):67-76.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  11. Loop duodenal switch confers more complications with little gain of weight loss compared to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2025 02; 39(2):1261-1268.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  12. Using impedance planimetry (EndoFLIP) to determine ideal distensibility ranges for esophageal motility disorders. Surgery. 2025 03; 179:108803.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  13. Comparable improvement and resolution of obesity-related comorbidities in endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty vs laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: single-center study. Surg Endosc. 2024 10; 38(10):5914-5921.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  14. Impact of Toupet fundoplication with bougie on post-operative dysphagia and quality of life. Surg Endosc. 2024 09; 38(9):5350-5355.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  15. Efficacy and outcomes of per oral plication of the (neo)esophagus (POPE) for impaired emptying in achalasia and post-esophagectomy patients. Surg Endosc. 2024 09; 38(9):5239-5245.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  16. Gas and Bloat in Female Patients after Antireflux Procedures: Analysis of 934 Cases. J Am Coll Surg. 2024 Jul 01; 239(1):18-29.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  17. Personalized anti-reflux surgery: connecting GERD phenotypes in 690 patients to outcomes. Surg Endosc. 2024 06; 38(6):3273-3278.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  18. Impedance planimetry and panometry (EndoFLIP™) can replace manometry in preoperative anti-reflux surgery assessment. Surg Endosc. 2024 01; 38(1):339-347.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  19. Changes in impedance planimetry (EndoFLIP) measurements at follow-up after peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). Surg Endosc. 2022 12; 36(12):9410-9415.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  20. Long-term retention after structured curriculum on attainment of critical view of safety during laparoscopic cholecystectomy for surgeons. Surgery. 2022 03; 171(3):577-583.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  21. Impedance planimetry (EndoFLIP) measurements persist long term after anti-reflux surgery. Surgery. 2022 03; 171(3):628-634.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  22. Significant changes in impedance planimetry (EndoFLIP™) measurements after peroral pyloromyotomy for delayed gastric emptying. Surg Endosc. 2022 02; 36(2):1536-1543.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  23. Comparing cost and outcomes between peroral endoscopic myotomy and laparoscopic heller myotomy. Am J Surg. 2021 07; 222(1):208-213.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  24. Teaching peroral endoscopic pyloromyotomy (POP) to practicing endoscopists: An "into-the-fire" approach to simulation. Surgery. 2021 03; 169(3):502-507.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  25. Predictors of chronic pain after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Surgery. 2021 03; 169(3):586-594.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  26. Comparing short-term patient outcomes after fundoplication performed over a traditional bougie versus a functional lumen imaging probe. Surgery. 2021 03; 169(3):533-538.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  27. Primary Care Physicians' Perceptions of Bariatric Surgery and Major Barriers to Referral. Obes Surg. 2020 02; 30(2):521-526.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  28. Endoscopic Suturing Results in High Technical and Clinical Success Rates for a Variety of Gastrointestinal Pathologies. J Gastrointest Surg. 2020 02; 24(2):278-287.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  29. Improving attainment of the critical view of safety during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2020 09; 34(9):4115-4123.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  30. Predictors for recurrence after open umbilical hernia repair in 979 patients. Surgery. 2019 10; 166(4):615-622.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  31. Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair after prostatectomy: Evaluating safety, efficacy, and efficiency. Surgery. 2019 10; 166(4):607-614.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  32. Initial Experience with Endoscopic Pyloromyotomy, with Description and Video of Technique. J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 08; 23(8):1706-1710.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  33. First Experience with Banded Anti-reflux Mucosectomy (ARMS) for GERD: Feasibility, Safety, and Technique (with Video). J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 06; 23(6):1274-1278.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  34. Effects of dexamethasone on postoperative urinary retention after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endosc. 2019 09; 33(9):3008-3013.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  35. Predicting Progression in Barrett's Esophagus: Development and Validation of the Barrett's Esophagus Assessment of Risk Score (BEAR Score). Ann Surg. 2018 04; 267(4):716-720.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  36. Endoscopic gastrojejunostomy revision is more effective than medical management alone to address weight regain after RYGB. Surg Endosc. 2018 03; 32(3):1564-1571.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  37. Quality of life after laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal repair of an asymptomatic inguinal hernia. Surg Endosc. 2018 Feb; 32(2):813-819.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  38. Predictors of pathologic upstaging in early esophageal adenocarcinoma: Results from the national cancer database. Am J Surg. 2018 07; 216(1):124-130.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  39. Rectus abdominis atrophy after ventral abdominal incisions: midline versus chevron. Hernia. 2017 08; 21(4):619-622.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  40. Outcomes in patients with over 1-year follow-up after peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). Surg Endosc. 2017 04; 31(4):1550-1557.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  41. Outcomes following 50 consecutive endoscopic gastrojejunal revisions for weight gain following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a comparison of endoscopic suturing techniques for stoma reduction. Surg Endosc. 2017 06; 31(6):2667-2677.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  42. Long-term patterns and predictors of pain following laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a patient-centered analysis. Surg Endosc. 2017 05; 31(5):2109-2121.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  43. Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal Groin Hernia Repair and Quality of Life at 2-Year Follow-Up. J Am Coll Surg. 2016 07; 223(1):153-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  44. Efficacy of a Required Preoperative Weight Loss Program for Patients Undergoing Bariatric Surgery. J Gastrointest Surg. 2016 Apr; 20(4):667-73.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  45. Modified laparoscopic Sugarbaker repair decreases recurrence rates of parastomal hernia. Surgery. 2015 Oct; 158(4):954-9; discussion 959-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  46. Educating surgeons may allow for reduced intraoperative costs for inguinal herniorrhaphy. J Am Coll Surg. 2015 Jun; 220(6):1107-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  47. Reflux control is important in the management of Barrett's Esophagus: results from a retrospective 1,830 patient cohort. Surg Endosc. 2015 Dec; 29(12):3528-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  48. Management options for obesity after bariatric surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2015 Feb; 25(1):15-18.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  49. Patient-centered outcomes following laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endosc. 2015 Sep; 29(9):2512-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  50. Quality of life assessment after peroral endoscopic myotomy. Surg Endosc. 2015 May; 29(5):1198-202.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  51. Management of non-parasitic splenic cysts: does size really matter? J Gastrointest Surg. 2014 Sep; 18(9):1658-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  52. Predicting regression of Barrett's esophagus: results from a retrospective cohort of 1342 patients. Surg Endosc. 2014 Oct; 28(10):2803-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  53. Single-incision results in similar pain and quality of life scores compared with multi-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A blinded prospective randomized trial of 100 patients. Surgery. 2013 Oct; 154(4):662-70; discussion 670-1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  54. Peroral endoscopic myotomy: A short-term comparison with the standard laparoscopic approach. Surgery. 2013 Oct; 154(4):893-7; discussion 897-900.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  55. Patient-centered outcomes after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2013 Dec; 27(12):4491-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  56. Single-incision surgery has higher cost with equivalent pain and quality-of-life scores compared with multiple-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized blinded comparison. J Am Coll Surg. 2012 Nov; 215(5):702-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  57. Laparoscopic ischemic conditioning of the stomach prior to esophagectomy. Dis Esophagus. 2013 Jul; 26(5):479-86.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  58. Laparoscopic modified Sugarbaker technique results in superior recurrence rate. Surg Endosc. 2012 Dec; 26(12):3430-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  59. Emergent pancreaticoduodenectomy for Dieulafoy lesion of the duodenum. Am Surg. 2010 Jun; 76(6):656-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  60. Parathyroid cyst: often mistaken for a thyroid cyst. World J Surg. 2007 Jan; 31(1):60-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  61. Impact of preoperative depression severity and antidepressant medication use on perioperative outcomes and long-term weight loss following primary bariatric surgery. Surg Endosc. 2026 Aug; 40(8):7133-7142.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  62. Retrograde gastric intussusception after myotomy for achalasia. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006 Mar; 81(3):1134-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  63. Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy for follicular neoplasm: is there an advantage over conventional thyroidectomy? Ann Surg Oncol. 2006 Feb; 13(2):182-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  64. Outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal squamous neoplasms: a multicenter North American experience. Gastrointest Endosc. 2026 07; 104(1):21-29.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  65. Does (patient) size matter? the impact of body mass index on outcomes for patients undergoing minimally invasive transversus abdominis release. Hernia. 2025 12 17; 30(1):41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  66. Size and measurement technique both matter: accuracy of preoperative physical exam and computed tomography in predicting hernia size and current procedural terminology codes for incisional hernia. Surg Endosc. 2025 Sep; 39(9):6149-6154.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  67. A New International Scheme for the Classification and Management of Clinical Outcomes Post-gastric Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025 Dec; 23(13):2477-2487.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  68. Safety of same-day discharge after gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy in patients with refractory gastroparesis: an international multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2025 10; 102(4):595-599.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  69. One hundred consecutive laparoscopic ventral hernia repairs. Am J Surg. 2004 Nov; 188(5):593-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  70. Higher rates of recurrence and worse quality of life in obese patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair. Hernia. 2024 12; 28(6):2255-2264.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  71. Randomized Controlled Trial Based US Commercial Payor Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty Versus Lifestyle Modification Alone for Adults With Class I/II Obesity. Obes Surg. 2024 09; 34(9):3275-3284.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  72. Clinical outcomes of peroral endoscopic myotomy with and without septotomy for management of epiphrenic diverticula: an international multicenter experience (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2024 11; 100(5):840-848.e4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  73. A Delphi Method for Development of a Barrett's Esophagus Question Prompt List as a Communication Tool for Optimal Patient-physician Communication. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2024 02 01; 58(2):131-135.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  74. Peroral endoscopic myotomy for spastic esophageal dysmotility among opioid users: a multicenter propensity score matching study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2024 06; 99(6):924-930.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  75. Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty as an early tool against obesity: a multicenter international study on an overweight population. Gastrointest Endosc. 2024 03; 99(3):371-376.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  76. CT scan in the management of acute appendicitis. J Surg Res. 2002 Jun 15; 105(2):119-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  77. Role of functional luminal imaging probe in the management of postmyotomy clinical failure. Gastrointest Endosc. 2022 07; 96(1):9-17.e3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  78. Management of patients after failed peroral endoscopic myotomy: a multicenter study. Endoscopy. 2021 10; 53(10):1003-1010.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  79. Comprehensive Analysis of Adverse Events Associated with Gastric Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy: An International Multicenter Study. Surg Endosc. 2021 04; 35(4):1755-1764.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  80. An analysis of results in a single-blinded, prospective randomized controlled trial comparing non-fixating versus self-fixating mesh for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endosc. 2019 08; 33(8):2670-2679.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  81. Peritoneal dialysis catheter function and survival are not adversely affected by obesity regardless of the operative technique used. Surg Endosc. 2018 04; 32(4):1714-1723.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  82. Comprehensive Analysis of Adverse Events Associated With Per Oral Endoscopic Myotomy in 1826 Patients: An International Multicenter Study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2017 Aug; 112(8):1267-1276.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  83. Evaluation of crowd-sourced assessment of the critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2017 Dec; 31(12):5094-5100.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  84. Efficacy and Safety of Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for Treatment of Achalasia After Failed Heller Myotomy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Oct; 15(10):1531-1537.e3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  85. Randomized sham-controlled trial evaluating efficacy and safety of endoscopic gastric plication for primary obesity: The ESSENTIAL trial. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2017 02; 25(2):294-301.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  86. Long-term outcomes of per-oral endoscopic myotomy in patients with achalasia with a minimum follow-up of 2 years: an international multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 May; 85(5):927-933.e2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  87. Laparoscopic peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion using rectus sheath tunnel and selective omentopexy significantly reduces catheter dysfunction and increases peritoneal dialysis longevity. Surgery. 2016 10; 160(4):924-935.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  88. A Model of Cost Reduction and Standardization: Improved Cost Savings While Maintaining the Quality of Care. Dis Colon Rectum. 2015 Nov; 58(11):1104-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  89. International multicenter experience with peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of spastic esophageal disorders refractory to medical therapy (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 May; 81(5):1170-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  90. Laparoscopy has a superior diagnostic yield than percutaneous image-guided biopsy for suspected intra-abdominal lymphoma. Surg Endosc. 2015 Sep; 29(9):2496-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  91. Six month outcomes in patients experiencing weight gain after gastric bypass who underwent gastrojejunal revision using an endoluminal suturing device. Surg Endosc. 2015 Aug; 29(8):2133-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  92. Surgical management of breast cancer liver metastases. HPB (Oxford). 2011 Apr; 13(4):272-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  93. Outcome after laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation of technically resectable colorectal liver metastases. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Jul; 18(7):1947-54.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  94. Adding days spent in readmission to the initial postoperative length of stay limits the perceived benefit of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy when compared with open distal pancreatectomy. Am J Surg. 2011 Mar; 201(3):295-9; discussion 299-300.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  95. Computed tomography (CT)-guided versus laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation: a single-institution comparison of morbidity rates and hospital costs. Surg Endosc. 2011 Apr; 25(4):1088-95.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  96. A prospective single institution comparison of peri-operative outcomes for laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy. Surgery. 2009 Oct; 146(4):635-43; discussion 643-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  97. Patient factors predictive of 24-h pH normalization following endoluminal gastroplication for GERD. Surg Endosc. 2009 Nov; 23(11):2525-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  98. Percutaneous endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. Arch Surg. 2007 Nov; 142(11):1049-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  99. Outcomes after pancreatectomy for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas: an institutional experience. Surgery. 2007 Oct; 142(4):529-34; discussion 534-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  100. Decreased incidence of left common iliac vein compression in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2006 Sep; 44(3):595-600.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  101. Advance directive use among patients undergoing high-risk operations. Am J Surg. 2004 Jul; 188(1):98-101.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  102. Hospital vascular surgery volume and procedure mortality rates in California, 1982-1994. J Vasc Surg. 1998 Jul; 28(1):45-56; discussion 56-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.