The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Michael Ujiki to Male

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Michael Ujiki has written about Male.
Michael Ujiki
Connection Strength
2.489
Male
  1. Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)-associated chronic cough: long-term outcomes and predictors of response to anti-reflux surgery. Surg Endosc. 2026 Sep; 40(9):8094-8104.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  2. Nissen versus Toupet fundoplication quality-of-life outcomes compared by intraoperative EndoFLIP™ distensibility index range. Surg Endosc. 2026 Aug; 40(8):6966-6971.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  3. Hiatal hernia size predicts abnormal pH testing: a retrospective cohort study. Surg Endosc. 2026 Jul; 40(7):6293-6300.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  4. The utility of routine pH studies after antireflux surgery. Surgery. 2026 Sep; 197:110151.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  5. Extended venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after bariatric surgery does not increase postoperative bleeding complications. Surgery. 2026 Mar; 191:109918.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  6. Ideal impedance planimetry (EndoFLIP) distensibility ranges for male and female patients undergoing laparoscopic fundoplication. Surgery. 2026 Mar; 191:109903.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  7. Long-term outcomes of Zenker's peroral endoscopic myotomy: endoscopic suturing is effective for large Zenker's diverticula. Surg Endosc. 2025 Oct; 39(10):6765-6772.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  8. Can intraoperative impedance planimetry (EndoFLIP™) during anti-reflux surgery replace preoperative manometry with no difference in patient outcomes? Surg Endosc. 2025 Oct; 39(10):6756-6764.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  9. Decision regret for patients undergoing laparoscopic Heller myotomy and peroral endoscopic myotomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2025 09; 29(9):102141.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  10. Preoperative Biomarkers and Thromboelastometry According to Caprini Venous Thromboembolism Risk Stratification in Bariatric Patients: Are Clinical Risk Assessments Enough? J Am Coll Surg. 2025 Jul 01; 241(1):67-76.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  11. Loop duodenal switch confers more complications with little gain of weight loss compared to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2025 02; 39(2):1261-1268.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  12. Using impedance planimetry (EndoFLIP) to determine ideal distensibility ranges for esophageal motility disorders. Surgery. 2025 03; 179:108803.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  13. Comparable improvement and resolution of obesity-related comorbidities in endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty vs laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: single-center study. Surg Endosc. 2024 10; 38(10):5914-5921.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  14. Impact of Toupet fundoplication with bougie on post-operative dysphagia and quality of life. Surg Endosc. 2024 09; 38(9):5350-5355.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  15. Efficacy and outcomes of per oral plication of the (neo)esophagus (POPE) for impaired emptying in achalasia and post-esophagectomy patients. Surg Endosc. 2024 09; 38(9):5239-5245.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  16. Gas and Bloat in Female Patients after Antireflux Procedures: Analysis of 934 Cases. J Am Coll Surg. 2024 Jul 01; 239(1):18-29.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  17. Personalized anti-reflux surgery: connecting GERD phenotypes in 690 patients to outcomes. Surg Endosc. 2024 06; 38(6):3273-3278.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  18. Impedance planimetry and panometry (EndoFLIP™) can replace manometry in preoperative anti-reflux surgery assessment. Surg Endosc. 2024 01; 38(1):339-347.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  19. Changes in impedance planimetry (EndoFLIP) measurements at follow-up after peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). Surg Endosc. 2022 12; 36(12):9410-9415.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  20. Patient-reported bowel and bladder function is not adversely impacted by bariatric surgery. Surg Endosc. 2022 09; 36(9):6896-6902.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  21. Long-term retention after structured curriculum on attainment of critical view of safety during laparoscopic cholecystectomy for surgeons. Surgery. 2022 03; 171(3):577-583.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  22. Impedance planimetry (EndoFLIP) measurements persist long term after anti-reflux surgery. Surgery. 2022 03; 171(3):628-634.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  23. Significant changes in impedance planimetry (EndoFLIP™) measurements after peroral pyloromyotomy for delayed gastric emptying. Surg Endosc. 2022 02; 36(2):1536-1543.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  24. Comparing cost and outcomes between peroral endoscopic myotomy and laparoscopic heller myotomy. Am J Surg. 2021 07; 222(1):208-213.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  25. Teaching peroral endoscopic pyloromyotomy (POP) to practicing endoscopists: An "into-the-fire" approach to simulation. Surgery. 2021 03; 169(3):502-507.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  26. Predictors of chronic pain after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Surgery. 2021 03; 169(3):586-594.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  27. Comparing short-term patient outcomes after fundoplication performed over a traditional bougie versus a functional lumen imaging probe. Surgery. 2021 03; 169(3):533-538.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  28. Use of Impedance Planimetry (Endoflip) in Foregut Surgery Practice: Experience of More than 400 Cases. J Am Coll Surg. 2020 07; 231(1):160-171.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  29. Primary Care Physicians' Perceptions of Bariatric Surgery and Major Barriers to Referral. Obes Surg. 2020 02; 30(2):521-526.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  30. Long-term outcomes after subtotal reconstituting cholecystectomy: A retrospective case series. Am J Surg. 2020 09; 220(3):736-740.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  31. Endoscopic Suturing Results in High Technical and Clinical Success Rates for a Variety of Gastrointestinal Pathologies. J Gastrointest Surg. 2020 02; 24(2):278-287.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  32. Improving attainment of the critical view of safety during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2020 09; 34(9):4115-4123.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  33. A 1-day simulation-based boot camp for incoming general surgery residents improves confidence and technical skills. Surgery. 2019 10; 166(4):572-579.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  34. Predictors for recurrence after open umbilical hernia repair in 979 patients. Surgery. 2019 10; 166(4):615-622.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  35. Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair after prostatectomy: Evaluating safety, efficacy, and efficiency. Surgery. 2019 10; 166(4):607-614.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  36. Five-year results of endoscopic gastrojejunostomy revision (transoral outlet reduction) for weight gain after gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2020 05; 34(5):2164-2171.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  37. Using impedance planimetry (EndoFLIP™) in the operating room to assess gastroesophageal junction distensibility and predict patient outcomes following fundoplication. Surg Endosc. 2020 04; 34(4):1761-1768.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  38. Initial Experience with Endoscopic Pyloromyotomy, with Description and Video of Technique. J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 08; 23(8):1706-1710.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  39. First Experience with Banded Anti-reflux Mucosectomy (ARMS) for GERD: Feasibility, Safety, and Technique (with Video). J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 06; 23(6):1274-1278.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  40. Effects of dexamethasone on postoperative urinary retention after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endosc. 2019 09; 33(9):3008-3013.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  41. Predicting Progression in Barrett's Esophagus: Development and Validation of the Barrett's Esophagus Assessment of Risk Score (BEAR Score). Ann Surg. 2018 04; 267(4):716-720.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  42. Patient-Centered Outcomes after Laparoscopic Paraesophageal Hernia Repair. J Am Coll Surg. 2018 07; 227(1):106-114.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  43. Endoscopic gastrojejunostomy revision is more effective than medical management alone to address weight regain after RYGB. Surg Endosc. 2018 03; 32(3):1564-1571.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  44. Video review program enhances resident training in laparoscopic inguinal hernia: a randomized blinded controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2018 06; 32(6):2847-2851.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  45. Characterization of common bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a high-volume hospital system. Surg Endosc. 2018 03; 32(3):1184-1191.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  46. Quality of life after laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal repair of an asymptomatic inguinal hernia. Surg Endosc. 2018 Feb; 32(2):813-819.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  47. Predictors of pathologic upstaging in early esophageal adenocarcinoma: Results from the national cancer database. Am J Surg. 2018 07; 216(1):124-130.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  48. Rectus abdominis atrophy after ventral abdominal incisions: midline versus chevron. Hernia. 2017 08; 21(4):619-622.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  49. Outcomes in patients with over 1-year follow-up after peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). Surg Endosc. 2017 04; 31(4):1550-1557.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  50. Outcomes following 50 consecutive endoscopic gastrojejunal revisions for weight gain following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a comparison of endoscopic suturing techniques for stoma reduction. Surg Endosc. 2017 06; 31(6):2667-2677.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  51. A Comparative Assessment of Novel Mini-Laparoscopic Tools. Surg Innov. 2017 Feb; 24(1):35-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  52. Long-term patterns and predictors of pain following laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a patient-centered analysis. Surg Endosc. 2017 05; 31(5):2109-2121.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  53. Goal setting results in improvement in surgical skills: A randomized controlled trial. Surgery. 2016 10; 160(4):1028-1037.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  54. Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal Groin Hernia Repair and Quality of Life at 2-Year Follow-Up. J Am Coll Surg. 2016 07; 223(1):153-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  55. Efficacy of a Required Preoperative Weight Loss Program for Patients Undergoing Bariatric Surgery. J Gastrointest Surg. 2016 Apr; 20(4):667-73.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  56. Elderly and octogenarian cohort: Comparable outcomes with nonelderly cohort after open or laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs. Surgery. 2015 Oct; 158(4):1137-43; discussion 1143-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  57. Modified laparoscopic Sugarbaker repair decreases recurrence rates of parastomal hernia. Surgery. 2015 Oct; 158(4):954-9; discussion 959-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  58. Reflux control is important in the management of Barrett's Esophagus: results from a retrospective 1,830 patient cohort. Surg Endosc. 2015 Dec; 29(12):3528-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  59. Management options for obesity after bariatric surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2015 Feb; 25(1):15-18.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  60. Patient-centered outcomes following laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endosc. 2015 Sep; 29(9):2512-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  61. Quality of life assessment after peroral endoscopic myotomy. Surg Endosc. 2015 May; 29(5):1198-202.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  62. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM): feasible as reoperation following Heller myotomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014 Jun; 18(6):1071-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  63. Management of non-parasitic splenic cysts: does size really matter? J Gastrointest Surg. 2014 Sep; 18(9):1658-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  64. Predicting regression of Barrett's esophagus: results from a retrospective cohort of 1342 patients. Surg Endosc. 2014 Oct; 28(10):2803-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  65. Single-incision results in similar pain and quality of life scores compared with multi-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A blinded prospective randomized trial of 100 patients. Surgery. 2013 Oct; 154(4):662-70; discussion 670-1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  66. Peroral endoscopic myotomy: A short-term comparison with the standard laparoscopic approach. Surgery. 2013 Oct; 154(4):893-7; discussion 897-900.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  67. Patient-centered outcomes after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2013 Dec; 27(12):4491-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  68. Single-incision surgery has higher cost with equivalent pain and quality-of-life scores compared with multiple-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized blinded comparison. J Am Coll Surg. 2012 Nov; 215(5):702-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  69. Laparoscopic ischemic conditioning of the stomach prior to esophagectomy. Dis Esophagus. 2013 Jul; 26(5):479-86.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  70. Laparoscopic modified Sugarbaker technique results in superior recurrence rate. Surg Endosc. 2012 Dec; 26(12):3430-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  71. Emergent pancreaticoduodenectomy for Dieulafoy lesion of the duodenum. Am Surg. 2010 Jun; 76(6):656-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  72. Parathyroid cyst: often mistaken for a thyroid cyst. World J Surg. 2007 Jan; 31(1):60-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  73. Impact of preoperative depression severity and antidepressant medication use on perioperative outcomes and long-term weight loss following primary bariatric surgery. Surg Endosc. 2026 Aug; 40(8):7133-7142.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  74. Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy for follicular neoplasm: is there an advantage over conventional thyroidectomy? Ann Surg Oncol. 2006 Feb; 13(2):182-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  75. Outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal squamous neoplasms: a multicenter North American experience. Gastrointest Endosc. 2026 07; 104(1):21-29.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  76. Does (patient) size matter? the impact of body mass index on outcomes for patients undergoing minimally invasive transversus abdominis release. Hernia. 2025 12 17; 30(1):41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  77. Size and measurement technique both matter: accuracy of preoperative physical exam and computed tomography in predicting hernia size and current procedural terminology codes for incisional hernia. Surg Endosc. 2025 Sep; 39(9):6149-6154.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  78. A New International Scheme for the Classification and Management of Clinical Outcomes Post-gastric Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025 Dec; 23(13):2477-2487.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  79. Safety of same-day discharge after gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy in patients with refractory gastroparesis: an international multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2025 10; 102(4):595-599.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  80. One hundred consecutive laparoscopic ventral hernia repairs. Am J Surg. 2004 Nov; 188(5):593-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  81. Neoplastic Progression Risk in Females With Barrett's Esophagus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Individual Patient Data. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025 02; 23(2):225-235.e8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  82. Higher rates of recurrence and worse quality of life in obese patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair. Hernia. 2024 12; 28(6):2255-2264.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  83. Randomized Controlled Trial Based US Commercial Payor Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty Versus Lifestyle Modification Alone for Adults With Class I/II Obesity. Obes Surg. 2024 09; 34(9):3275-3284.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  84. Clinical outcomes of peroral endoscopic myotomy with and without septotomy for management of epiphrenic diverticula: an international multicenter experience (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2024 11; 100(5):840-848.e4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  85. A Delphi Method for Development of a Barrett's Esophagus Question Prompt List as a Communication Tool for Optimal Patient-physician Communication. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2024 02 01; 58(2):131-135.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  86. Peroral endoscopic myotomy for spastic esophageal dysmotility among opioid users: a multicenter propensity score matching study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2024 06; 99(6):924-930.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  87. Zenker's peroral endoscopic myotomy for management of large Zenker's diverticulum. Endoscopy. 2023 06; 55(6):501-507.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  88. CT scan in the management of acute appendicitis. J Surg Res. 2002 Jun 15; 105(2):119-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  89. Zenker's peroral endoscopic myotomy, or flexible or rigid septotomy for Zenker's diverticulum: a multicenter retrospective comparison. Endoscopy. 2022 04; 54(4):345-351.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  90. Management of patients after failed peroral endoscopic myotomy: a multicenter study. Endoscopy. 2021 10; 53(10):1003-1010.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  91. Laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal and transabdominal preperitoneal approaches are equally effective for spigelian hernia repair. Surg Endosc. 2021 04; 35(4):1827-1833.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  92. Comprehensive Analysis of Adverse Events Associated with Gastric Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy: An International Multicenter Study. Surg Endosc. 2021 04; 35(4):1755-1764.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  93. An international study on the use of peroral endoscopic myotomy in the management of Zenker's diverticulum. Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 01; 91(1):163-168.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  94. An analysis of results in a single-blinded, prospective randomized controlled trial comparing non-fixating versus self-fixating mesh for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endosc. 2019 08; 33(8):2670-2679.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  95. Synoptic operative reporting for laparoscopic cholecystectomy and pancreaticoduodenectomy: A multi institutional pilot study evaluating completeness and surgeon perceptions. Am J Surg. 2018 11; 216(5):935-940.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  96. Teaching peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) to surgeons in practice: an "into the fire" pre/post-test curriculum. Surg Endosc. 2018 03; 32(3):1414-1421.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  97. Peritoneal dialysis catheter function and survival are not adversely affected by obesity regardless of the operative technique used. Surg Endosc. 2018 04; 32(4):1714-1723.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  98. Passing the fundamentals of endoscopic surgery (FES) exam: linking specialty choice and attitudes about endoscopic surgery to success. Surg Endosc. 2018 Jan; 32(1):225-228.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  99. Comprehensive Analysis of Adverse Events Associated With Per Oral Endoscopic Myotomy in 1826 Patients: An International Multicenter Study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2017 Aug; 112(8):1267-1276.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  100. Evaluation of crowd-sourced assessment of the critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2017 Dec; 31(12):5094-5100.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  101. An international multicenter study evaluating the clinical efficacy and safety of per-oral endoscopic myotomy in octogenarians. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Apr; 87(4):956-961.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  102. Efficacy and Safety of Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for Treatment of Achalasia After Failed Heller Myotomy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Oct; 15(10):1531-1537.e3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  103. Randomized sham-controlled trial evaluating efficacy and safety of endoscopic gastric plication for primary obesity: The ESSENTIAL trial. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2017 02; 25(2):294-301.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  104. Long-term outcomes of per-oral endoscopic myotomy in patients with achalasia with a minimum follow-up of 2 years: an international multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 May; 85(5):927-933.e2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  105. Laparoscopic peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion using rectus sheath tunnel and selective omentopexy significantly reduces catheter dysfunction and increases peritoneal dialysis longevity. Surgery. 2016 10; 160(4):924-935.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  106. A Model of Cost Reduction and Standardization: Improved Cost Savings While Maintaining the Quality of Care. Dis Colon Rectum. 2015 Nov; 58(11):1104-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  107. International multicenter experience with peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of spastic esophageal disorders refractory to medical therapy (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 May; 81(5):1170-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  108. Laparoscopy has a superior diagnostic yield than percutaneous image-guided biopsy for suspected intra-abdominal lymphoma. Surg Endosc. 2015 Sep; 29(9):2496-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  109. Six month outcomes in patients experiencing weight gain after gastric bypass who underwent gastrojejunal revision using an endoluminal suturing device. Surg Endosc. 2015 Aug; 29(8):2133-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  110. Fundamentals of endoscopic surgery: creation and validation of the hands-on test. Surg Endosc. 2014 Mar; 28(3):704-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  111. Outcome after laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation of technically resectable colorectal liver metastases. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Jul; 18(7):1947-54.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  112. Adding days spent in readmission to the initial postoperative length of stay limits the perceived benefit of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy when compared with open distal pancreatectomy. Am J Surg. 2011 Mar; 201(3):295-9; discussion 299-300.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  113. Computed tomography (CT)-guided versus laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation: a single-institution comparison of morbidity rates and hospital costs. Surg Endosc. 2011 Apr; 25(4):1088-95.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  114. A prospective single institution comparison of peri-operative outcomes for laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy. Surgery. 2009 Oct; 146(4):635-43; discussion 643-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  115. Patient factors predictive of 24-h pH normalization following endoluminal gastroplication for GERD. Surg Endosc. 2009 Nov; 23(11):2525-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  116. Percutaneous endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. Arch Surg. 2007 Nov; 142(11):1049-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  117. Outcomes after pancreatectomy for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas: an institutional experience. Surgery. 2007 Oct; 142(4):529-34; discussion 534-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  118. Decreased incidence of left common iliac vein compression in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2006 Sep; 44(3):595-600.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  119. Pancreatic stellate cells (PSCs) express cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) and pancreatic cancer stimulates COX-2 in PSCs. Mol Cancer. 2005 Aug 05; 4:27.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  120. Pancreatic cancer stimulates pancreatic stellate cell proliferation and TIMP-1 production through the MAP kinase pathway. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004 Oct 29; 323(4):1241-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  121. Advance directive use among patients undergoing high-risk operations. Am J Surg. 2004 Jul; 188(1):98-101.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  122. Iliac vein compression in an asymptomatic patient population. J Vasc Surg. 2004 May; 39(5):937-43.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  123. The importance of surgeon volume and training in outcomes for vascular surgical procedures. J Vasc Surg. 1999 May; 29(5):768-76; discussion 777-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.