The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Michael Ujiki to Male

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Michael Ujiki has written about Male.
Michael Ujiki
Connection Strength
2.239
Male
  1. Comparable improvement and resolution of obesity-related comorbidities in endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty vs laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: single-center study. Surg Endosc. 2024 Oct; 38(10):5914-5921.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  2. Impact of Toupet fundoplication with bougie on post-operative dysphagia and quality of life. Surg Endosc. 2024 Sep; 38(9):5350-5355.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  3. Efficacy and outcomes of per oral plication of the (neo)esophagus (POPE) for impaired emptying in achalasia and post-esophagectomy patients. Surg Endosc. 2024 Sep; 38(9):5239-5245.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  4. Gas and Bloat in Female Patients after Antireflux Procedures: Analysis of 934 Cases. J Am Coll Surg. 2024 Jul 01; 239(1):18-29.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  5. Personalized anti-reflux surgery: connecting GERD phenotypes in 690 patients to outcomes. Surg Endosc. 2024 Jun; 38(6):3273-3278.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  6. Impedance planimetry and panometry (EndoFLIP™) can replace manometry in preoperative anti-reflux surgery assessment. Surg Endosc. 2024 01; 38(1):339-347.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  7. Changes in impedance planimetry (EndoFLIP) measurements at follow-up after peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). Surg Endosc. 2022 12; 36(12):9410-9415.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  8. Patient-reported bowel and bladder function is not adversely impacted by bariatric surgery. Surg Endosc. 2022 09; 36(9):6896-6902.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  9. Long-term retention after structured curriculum on attainment of critical view of safety during laparoscopic cholecystectomy for surgeons. Surgery. 2022 03; 171(3):577-583.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  10. Impedance planimetry (EndoFLIP) measurements persist long term after anti-reflux surgery. Surgery. 2022 03; 171(3):628-634.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  11. Significant changes in impedance planimetry (EndoFLIP™) measurements after peroral pyloromyotomy for delayed gastric emptying. Surg Endosc. 2022 02; 36(2):1536-1543.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  12. Comparing cost and outcomes between peroral endoscopic myotomy and laparoscopic heller myotomy. Am J Surg. 2021 07; 222(1):208-213.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  13. Teaching peroral endoscopic pyloromyotomy (POP) to practicing endoscopists: An "into-the-fire" approach to simulation. Surgery. 2021 03; 169(3):502-507.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  14. Predictors of chronic pain after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Surgery. 2021 03; 169(3):586-594.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  15. Comparing short-term patient outcomes after fundoplication performed over a traditional bougie versus a functional lumen imaging probe. Surgery. 2021 03; 169(3):533-538.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  16. Use of Impedance Planimetry (Endoflip) in Foregut Surgery Practice: Experience of More than 400 Cases. J Am Coll Surg. 2020 07; 231(1):160-171.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  17. Primary Care Physicians' Perceptions of Bariatric Surgery and Major Barriers to Referral. Obes Surg. 2020 02; 30(2):521-526.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  18. Long-term outcomes after subtotal reconstituting cholecystectomy: A retrospective case series. Am J Surg. 2020 09; 220(3):736-740.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  19. Endoscopic Suturing Results in High Technical and Clinical Success Rates for a Variety of Gastrointestinal Pathologies. J Gastrointest Surg. 2020 02; 24(2):278-287.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  20. Improving attainment of the critical view of safety during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2020 09; 34(9):4115-4123.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  21. A 1-day simulation-based boot camp for incoming general surgery residents improves confidence and technical skills. Surgery. 2019 10; 166(4):572-579.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  22. Predictors for recurrence after open umbilical hernia repair in 979 patients. Surgery. 2019 10; 166(4):615-622.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  23. Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair after prostatectomy: Evaluating safety, efficacy, and efficiency. Surgery. 2019 10; 166(4):607-614.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  24. Five-year results of endoscopic gastrojejunostomy revision (transoral outlet reduction) for weight gain after gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2020 05; 34(5):2164-2171.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  25. Using impedance planimetry (EndoFLIP™) in the operating room to assess gastroesophageal junction distensibility and predict patient outcomes following fundoplication. Surg Endosc. 2020 04; 34(4):1761-1768.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  26. Initial Experience with Endoscopic Pyloromyotomy, with Description and Video of Technique. J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 08; 23(8):1706-1710.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  27. First Experience with Banded Anti-reflux Mucosectomy (ARMS) for GERD: Feasibility, Safety, and Technique (with Video). J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 06; 23(6):1274-1278.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  28. Effects of dexamethasone on postoperative urinary retention after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endosc. 2019 09; 33(9):3008-3013.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  29. Predicting Progression in Barrett's Esophagus: Development and Validation of the Barrett's Esophagus Assessment of Risk Score (BEAR Score). Ann Surg. 2018 04; 267(4):716-720.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  30. Patient-Centered Outcomes after Laparoscopic Paraesophageal Hernia Repair. J Am Coll Surg. 2018 07; 227(1):106-114.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  31. Endoscopic gastrojejunostomy revision is more effective than medical management alone to address weight regain after RYGB. Surg Endosc. 2018 03; 32(3):1564-1571.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  32. Video review program enhances resident training in laparoscopic inguinal hernia: a randomized blinded controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2018 06; 32(6):2847-2851.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  33. Characterization of common bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a high-volume hospital system. Surg Endosc. 2018 03; 32(3):1184-1191.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  34. Quality of life after laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal repair of an asymptomatic inguinal hernia. Surg Endosc. 2018 Feb; 32(2):813-819.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  35. Predictors of pathologic upstaging in early esophageal adenocarcinoma: Results from the national cancer database. Am J Surg. 2018 07; 216(1):124-130.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  36. Rectus abdominis atrophy after ventral abdominal incisions: midline versus chevron. Hernia. 2017 08; 21(4):619-622.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  37. Outcomes in patients with over 1-year follow-up after peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). Surg Endosc. 2017 04; 31(4):1550-1557.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  38. Outcomes following 50 consecutive endoscopic gastrojejunal revisions for weight gain following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a comparison of endoscopic suturing techniques for stoma reduction. Surg Endosc. 2017 06; 31(6):2667-2677.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  39. A Comparative Assessment of Novel Mini-Laparoscopic Tools. Surg Innov. 2017 Feb; 24(1):35-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  40. Long-term patterns and predictors of pain following laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a patient-centered analysis. Surg Endosc. 2017 05; 31(5):2109-2121.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  41. Goal setting results in improvement in surgical skills: A randomized controlled trial. Surgery. 2016 10; 160(4):1028-1037.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  42. Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal Groin Hernia Repair and Quality of Life at 2-Year Follow-Up. J Am Coll Surg. 2016 07; 223(1):153-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  43. Efficacy of a Required Preoperative Weight Loss Program for Patients Undergoing Bariatric Surgery. J Gastrointest Surg. 2016 Apr; 20(4):667-73.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  44. Elderly and octogenarian cohort: Comparable outcomes with nonelderly cohort after open or laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs. Surgery. 2015 Oct; 158(4):1137-43; discussion 1143-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  45. Modified laparoscopic Sugarbaker repair decreases recurrence rates of parastomal hernia. Surgery. 2015 Oct; 158(4):954-9; discussion 959-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  46. Reflux control is important in the management of Barrett's Esophagus: results from a retrospective 1,830 patient cohort. Surg Endosc. 2015 Dec; 29(12):3528-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  47. Management options for obesity after bariatric surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2015 Feb; 25(1):15-18.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  48. Patient-centered outcomes following laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endosc. 2015 Sep; 29(9):2512-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  49. Quality of life assessment after peroral endoscopic myotomy. Surg Endosc. 2015 May; 29(5):1198-202.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  50. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM): feasible as reoperation following Heller myotomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014 Jun; 18(6):1071-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  51. Management of non-parasitic splenic cysts: does size really matter? J Gastrointest Surg. 2014 Sep; 18(9):1658-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  52. Predicting regression of Barrett's esophagus: results from a retrospective cohort of 1342 patients. Surg Endosc. 2014 Oct; 28(10):2803-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  53. Single-incision results in similar pain and quality of life scores compared with multi-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A blinded prospective randomized trial of 100 patients. Surgery. 2013 Oct; 154(4):662-70; discussion 670-1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  54. Peroral endoscopic myotomy: A short-term comparison with the standard laparoscopic approach. Surgery. 2013 Oct; 154(4):893-7; discussion 897-900.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  55. Patient-centered outcomes after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2013 Dec; 27(12):4491-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  56. Single-incision surgery has higher cost with equivalent pain and quality-of-life scores compared with multiple-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized blinded comparison. J Am Coll Surg. 2012 Nov; 215(5):702-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  57. Laparoscopic ischemic conditioning of the stomach prior to esophagectomy. Dis Esophagus. 2013 Jul; 26(5):479-86.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  58. Laparoscopic modified Sugarbaker technique results in superior recurrence rate. Surg Endosc. 2012 Dec; 26(12):3430-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  59. Emergent pancreaticoduodenectomy for Dieulafoy lesion of the duodenum. Am Surg. 2010 Jun; 76(6):656-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  60. Parathyroid cyst: often mistaken for a thyroid cyst. World J Surg. 2007 Jan; 31(1):60-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  61. Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy for follicular neoplasm: is there an advantage over conventional thyroidectomy? Ann Surg Oncol. 2006 Feb; 13(2):182-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  62. One hundred consecutive laparoscopic ventral hernia repairs. Am J Surg. 2004 Nov; 188(5):593-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  63. Higher rates of recurrence and worse quality of life in obese patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair. Hernia. 2024 Dec; 28(6):2255-2264.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  64. Randomized Controlled Trial Based US Commercial Payor Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty Versus Lifestyle Modification Alone for Adults With Class I/II Obesity. Obes Surg. 2024 Sep; 34(9):3275-3284.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  65. Clinical outcomes of peroral endoscopic myotomy with and without septotomy for management of epiphrenic diverticula: an international multicenter experience (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2024 Nov; 100(5):840-848.e4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  66. A Delphi Method for Development of a Barrett's Esophagus Question Prompt List as a Communication Tool for Optimal Patient-physician Communication. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2024 02 01; 58(2):131-135.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  67. Peroral endoscopic myotomy for spastic esophageal dysmotility among opioid users: a multicenter propensity score matching study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2024 06; 99(6):924-930.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  68. Zenker's peroral endoscopic myotomy for management of large Zenker's diverticulum. Endoscopy. 2023 06; 55(6):501-507.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  69. CT scan in the management of acute appendicitis. J Surg Res. 2002 Jun 15; 105(2):119-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  70. Zenker's peroral endoscopic myotomy, or flexible or rigid septotomy for Zenker's diverticulum: a multicenter retrospective comparison. Endoscopy. 2022 04; 54(4):345-351.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  71. Management of patients after failed peroral endoscopic myotomy: a multicenter study. Endoscopy. 2021 10; 53(10):1003-1010.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  72. Laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal and transabdominal preperitoneal approaches are equally effective for spigelian hernia repair. Surg Endosc. 2021 04; 35(4):1827-1833.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  73. Comprehensive Analysis of Adverse Events Associated with Gastric Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy: An International Multicenter Study. Surg Endosc. 2021 04; 35(4):1755-1764.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  74. An international study on the use of peroral endoscopic myotomy in the management of Zenker's diverticulum. Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 01; 91(1):163-168.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  75. An analysis of results in a single-blinded, prospective randomized controlled trial comparing non-fixating versus self-fixating mesh for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endosc. 2019 08; 33(8):2670-2679.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  76. Synoptic operative reporting for laparoscopic cholecystectomy and pancreaticoduodenectomy: A multi institutional pilot study evaluating completeness and surgeon perceptions. Am J Surg. 2018 11; 216(5):935-940.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  77. Teaching peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) to surgeons in practice: an "into the fire" pre/post-test curriculum. Surg Endosc. 2018 03; 32(3):1414-1421.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  78. Peritoneal dialysis catheter function and survival are not adversely affected by obesity regardless of the operative technique used. Surg Endosc. 2018 04; 32(4):1714-1723.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  79. Passing the fundamentals of endoscopic surgery (FES) exam: linking specialty choice and attitudes about endoscopic surgery to success. Surg Endosc. 2018 Jan; 32(1):225-228.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  80. Comprehensive Analysis of Adverse Events Associated With Per Oral Endoscopic Myotomy in 1826 Patients: An International Multicenter Study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2017 Aug; 112(8):1267-1276.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  81. Evaluation of crowd-sourced assessment of the critical view of safety in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2017 Dec; 31(12):5094-5100.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  82. An international multicenter study evaluating the clinical efficacy and safety of per-oral endoscopic myotomy in octogenarians. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Apr; 87(4):956-961.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  83. Efficacy and Safety of Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for Treatment of Achalasia After Failed Heller Myotomy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Oct; 15(10):1531-1537.e3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  84. Randomized sham-controlled trial evaluating efficacy and safety of endoscopic gastric plication for primary obesity: The ESSENTIAL trial. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2017 02; 25(2):294-301.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  85. Long-term outcomes of per-oral endoscopic myotomy in patients with achalasia with a minimum follow-up of 2 years: an international multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 May; 85(5):927-933.e2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  86. Laparoscopic peritoneal dialysis catheter insertion using rectus sheath tunnel and selective omentopexy significantly reduces catheter dysfunction and increases peritoneal dialysis longevity. Surgery. 2016 10; 160(4):924-935.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  87. A Model of Cost Reduction and Standardization: Improved Cost Savings While Maintaining the Quality of Care. Dis Colon Rectum. 2015 Nov; 58(11):1104-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  88. International multicenter experience with peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of spastic esophageal disorders refractory to medical therapy (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 May; 81(5):1170-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  89. Laparoscopy has a superior diagnostic yield than percutaneous image-guided biopsy for suspected intra-abdominal lymphoma. Surg Endosc. 2015 Sep; 29(9):2496-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  90. Six month outcomes in patients experiencing weight gain after gastric bypass who underwent gastrojejunal revision using an endoluminal suturing device. Surg Endosc. 2015 Aug; 29(8):2133-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  91. Fundamentals of endoscopic surgery: creation and validation of the hands-on test. Surg Endosc. 2014 Mar; 28(3):704-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  92. Outcome after laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation of technically resectable colorectal liver metastases. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Jul; 18(7):1947-54.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  93. Adding days spent in readmission to the initial postoperative length of stay limits the perceived benefit of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy when compared with open distal pancreatectomy. Am J Surg. 2011 Mar; 201(3):295-9; discussion 299-300.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  94. Computed tomography (CT)-guided versus laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation: a single-institution comparison of morbidity rates and hospital costs. Surg Endosc. 2011 Apr; 25(4):1088-95.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  95. A prospective single institution comparison of peri-operative outcomes for laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy. Surgery. 2009 Oct; 146(4):635-43; discussion 643-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  96. Patient factors predictive of 24-h pH normalization following endoluminal gastroplication for GERD. Surg Endosc. 2009 Nov; 23(11):2525-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  97. Percutaneous endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. Arch Surg. 2007 Nov; 142(11):1049-52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  98. Outcomes after pancreatectomy for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas: an institutional experience. Surgery. 2007 Oct; 142(4):529-34; discussion 534-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  99. Decreased incidence of left common iliac vein compression in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2006 Sep; 44(3):595-600.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  100. Pancreatic stellate cells (PSCs) express cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) and pancreatic cancer stimulates COX-2 in PSCs. Mol Cancer. 2005 Aug 05; 4:27.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  101. Pancreatic cancer stimulates pancreatic stellate cell proliferation and TIMP-1 production through the MAP kinase pathway. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004 Oct 29; 323(4):1241-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  102. Advance directive use among patients undergoing high-risk operations. Am J Surg. 2004 Jul; 188(1):98-101.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  103. Iliac vein compression in an asymptomatic patient population. J Vasc Surg. 2004 May; 39(5):937-43.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  104. The importance of surgeon volume and training in outcomes for vascular surgical procedures. J Vasc Surg. 1999 May; 29(5):768-76; discussion 777-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.