The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Aytekin Oto to Contrast Media

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Aytekin Oto has written about Contrast Media.
Aytekin Oto
Connection Strength
6.006
Contrast Media
  1. Effectiveness of Dynamic Contrast Enhanced MRI with a Split Dose of Gadoterate Meglumine for Detection of Prostate Cancer. Acad Radiol. 2022 06; 29(6):796-803.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.565
  2. Comparison of T2-Weighted Imaging, DWI, and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI for Calculation of Prostate Cancer Index Lesion Volume: Correlation With Whole-Mount Pathology. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 02; 212(2):351-356.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.466
  3. IV Administered Gadodiamide Enters the Lumen of the Prostatic Glands: X-Ray Fluorescence Microscopy Examination of a Mouse Model. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Sep; 205(3):W313-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.371
  4. Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging Curve-type Analysis: Is It Helpful in the Differentiation of Prostate Cancer from Healthy Peripheral Zone? Radiology. 2015 May; 275(2):448-57.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.355
  5. Contrast-enhanced MRI of the small bowel in Crohn's disease. Abdom Imaging. 2011 Apr; 36(2):134-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.273
  6. Active Crohn's disease in the small bowel: evaluation by diffusion weighted imaging and quantitative dynamic contrast enhanced MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011 Mar; 33(3):615-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.272
  7. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2009 Apr; 20(2):105-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.238
  8. Signal intensity form of the Tofts model for quantitative analysis of prostate dynamic contrast enhanced MRI data. Phys Med Biol. 2021 01 22; 66(2):025002.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.135
  9. Comparison of DCE-MRI of murine model cancers with a low dose and high dose of contrast agent. Phys Med. 2021 Jan; 81:31-39.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.134
  10. Revisiting quantitative multi-parametric MRI of benign prostatic hyperplasia and its differentiation from transition zone cancer. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019 06; 44(6):2233-2243.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.120
  11. Use of Indicator Dilution Principle to Evaluate Accuracy of Arterial Input Function Measured With Low-Dose Ultrafast Prostate Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI. Tomography. 2019 06; 5(2):260-265.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.120
  12. Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer by Use of MRI-Derived Quantitative Risk Maps: A Feasibility Study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 08; 213(2):W66-W75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.120
  13. Multiparametric MRI Features and Pathologic Outcome of Wedge-Shaped Lesions in the Peripheral Zone on T2-Weighted Images of the Prostate. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 01; 212(1):124-129.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.116
  14. Evaluation of Focal Laser Ablation of Prostate Cancer Using High Spectral and Spatial Resolution Imaging: A Pilot Study. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 05; 49(5):1374-1380.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.115
  15. Feasibility of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using Low-Dose Gadolinium: Comparative Performance With Standard Dose in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis. Invest Radiol. 2018 10; 53(10):609-615.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.115
  16. Comparison of arterial input functions measured from ultra-fast dynamic contrast enhanced MRI and dynamic contrast enhanced computed tomography in prostate cancer patients. Phys Med Biol. 2018 01 30; 63(3):03NT01.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.110
  17. Multiparametric MR Imaging of the Prostate after Treatment of Prostate Cancer. Radiographics. 2018 Mar-Apr; 38(2):437-449.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.110
  18. Performance of Ultrafast DCE-MRI for Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer. Acad Radiol. 2018 03; 25(3):349-358.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.108
  19. Comparison of region-of-interest-averaged and pixel-averaged analysis of DCE-MRI data based on simulations and pre-clinical experiments. Phys Med Biol. 2017 Sep 05; 62(18):N445-N459.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.107
  20. Ultrafast Bilateral DCE-MRI of the Breast with Conventional Fourier Sampling: Preliminary Evaluation of Semi-quantitative Analysis. Acad Radiol. 2016 09; 23(9):1137-44.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.098
  21. Quantitative Multiparametric MRI Features and PTEN Expression of Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer: A Pilot Study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016 Mar; 206(3):559-65.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.096
  22. Measurements of Hepatic Metastasis on MR Imaging:: Assessment of Interobserver and Intersequence Variability. Acad Radiol. 2016 Feb; 23(2):132-43.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.094
  23. Evaluation of the gallbladder and cystic duct patency with gadoxetate disodium enhanced MR cholangiography: prospective comparison of patients with normal gallbladder function and acute cholecystitis. Acta Radiol. 2015 Jul; 56(7):782-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.086
  24. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging features of the normal central zone of the prostate. Acad Radiol. 2014 May; 21(5):569-77.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.085
  25. Validation of quantitative analysis of multiparametric prostate MR images for prostate cancer detection and aggressiveness assessment: a cross-imager study. Radiology. 2014 May; 271(2):461-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.083
  26. Prostate volumes derived from MRI and volume-adjusted serum prostate-specific antigen: correlation with Gleason score of prostate cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Nov; 201(5):1041-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.082
  27. Diffusion-weighted MRI of metastatic liver lesions: is there a difference between hypervascular and hypovascular metastases? Acta Radiol. 2014 Jun; 55(5):515-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.081
  28. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of focal liver lesions in the left and right lobes: is there a difference in ADC values? Acad Radiol. 2013 Apr; 20(4):440-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.079
  29. MR imaging-guided focal laser ablation for prostate cancer: phase I trial. Radiology. 2013 Jun; 267(3):932-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.078
  30. Seminal vesicle invasion in prostate cancer: evaluation by using multiparametric endorectal MR imaging. Radiology. 2013 Jun; 267(3):797-806.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.078
  31. Quantitative analysis of multiparametric prostate MR images: differentiation between prostate cancer and normal tissue and correlation with Gleason score--a computer-aided diagnosis development study. Radiology. 2013 Jun; 267(3):787-96.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.078
  32. Optimization of the dynamic, Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI of the liver: the effect of the injection rate. Acta Radiol. 2012 Nov 01; 53(9):961-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.076
  33. Local staging of prostate cancer with MRI. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2012 Jul-Aug; 18(4):365-73.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.073
  34. Diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of prostate cancer: correlation of quantitative MR parameters with Gleason score and tumor angiogenesis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Dec; 197(6):1382-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.072
  35. Diffusion-weighted MRI: role in detecting abdominopelvic internal fistulas and sinus tracts. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012 Jan; 35(1):125-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.071
  36. Diffusion-weighted MRI: a new tool for the diagnosis of fistula in ano. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009 Nov; 30(5):1021-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.062
  37. Quantitative analysis of dynamic contrast enhanced MRI for assessment of bowel inflammation in Crohn's disease pilot study. Acad Radiol. 2009 Oct; 16(10):1223-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.060
  38. Gadolinium-based contrast exposure, nephrogenic systemic fibrosis, and gadolinium detection in tissue. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 Apr; 190(4):1060-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  39. MR imaging evaluation of acute abdominal pain during pregnancy. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2006 Nov; 14(4):489-501, vi.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  40. Multidetector row CT of the liver. Radiol Clin North Am. 2005 Sep; 43(5):827-48, vii.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  41. Parametric maps of spatial two-tissue compartment model for prostate dynamic contrast enhanced MRI - comparison with the standard tofts model in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Phys Eng Sci Med. 2023 Sep; 46(3):1215-1226.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  42. CT attenuation of colorectal polypoid lesions: evaluation of contrast enhancement in CT colonography. Eur Radiol. 2003 Jul; 13(7):1657-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  43. Double contrast MR imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma evaluating lesion detection and conspicuity. Acad Radiol. 2002 Aug; 9 Suppl 2:S466-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  44. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Penetrating Trauma-Lower Abdomen and Pelvis. J Am Coll Radiol. 2019 Nov; 16(11S):S392-S398.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  45. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Acute Onset of Scrotal Pain-Without Trauma, Without Antecedent Mass. J Am Coll Radiol. 2019 May; 16(5S):S38-S43.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  46. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Post-treatment Follow-up Prostate Cancer. J Am Coll Radiol. 2018 May; 15(5S):S132-S149.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  47. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Pretreatment Staging of Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer. J Am Coll Radiol. 2018 May; 15(5S):S150-S159.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  48. Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a Pharmacodynamic Biomarker for Pazopanib in Metastatic Renal Carcinoma. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2017 04; 15(2):207-212.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  49. Arterial input functions (AIFs) measured directly from arteries with low and standard doses of contrast agent, and AIFs derived from reference tissues. Magn Reson Imaging. 2016 Feb; 34(2):197-203.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  50. ACR Appropriateness Criteria(®) on renal failure. Am J Med. 2014 Nov; 127(11):1041-1048.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  51. MR imaging of the prostate. Radiol Clin North Am. 2014 Jul; 52(4):811-37.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  52. Computerized liver volumetry on MRI by using 3D geodesic active contour segmentation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Jan; 202(1):152-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  53. Diffusion-weighted MRI of the abdomen: current value in clinical routine. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013 Jan; 37(1):35-47.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  54. MR imaging of ectopic pregnancy with an emphasis on unusual implantation sites. Jpn J Radiol. 2013 Feb; 31(2):75-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  55. Quantitative radiology: automated CT liver volumetry compared with interactive volumetry and manual volumetry. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Oct; 197(4):W706-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  56. High-resolution magnetic resonance colonography and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in a murine model of colitis. Magn Reson Med. 2010 Apr; 63(4):922-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  57. Reproducibility assessment of a multiple reference tissue method for quantitative dynamic contrast enhanced-MRI analysis. Magn Reson Med. 2009 Apr; 61(4):851-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  58. Myocardial delayed enhancement imaging: comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional inversion prepared fast gradient echo and steady state free precession sequences. JBR-BTR. 2007 Mar-Apr; 90(2):124-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  59. Rapid CT diagnosis of acute appendicitis with IV contrast material. Emerg Radiol. 2006 Mar; 12(3):99-102.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  60. Traumatic diaphragmatic rupture: can oral contrast increase CT detectability? Emerg Radiol. 2004 Jul; 10(6):334-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  61. Imaging of pancreatic transplantation using portal venous and enteric exocrine drainage. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998 Jul; 171(1):157-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.