The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Peter Angelos to Physician-Patient Relations

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Peter Angelos has written about Physician-Patient Relations.
Connection Strength

5.463
  1. What Do We Owe Our Patients? Surgeon Obligations When Patients Are Too Sick for Surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2024 Oct 01; 239(4):394-399.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.652
  2. Ethical and Legal Considerations of Patients Audio Recording, Videotaping, and Broadcasting Physician Encounters. JAMA Surg. 2021 02 01; 156(2):119-120.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.507
  3. Responsibilities and Expectations: Considerations of Disclosure of Overlapping Operations. Ann Surg. 2020 06; 271(6):1016-1017.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.484
  4. The Ethics of Introducing New Surgical Technology Into Clinical Practice: The Importance of the Patient-Surgeon Relationship. JAMA Surg. 2016 05 01; 151(5):405-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.365
  5. The Ethics of Disclosure and Counseling of Patients With Thyroid Cancer. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Nov; 141(11):957-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.352
  6. Ethical Issues in Surgical Critical Care: The Complexity of Interpersonal Relationships in the Surgical Intensive Care Unit. J Intensive Care Med. 2016 Aug; 31(7):442-50.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.341
  7. Surgical Ethics Symposium: Ethical dilemmas in surgical practice. World J Surg. 2014 Jul; 38(7):1567.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.321
  8. An organized approach to complex ethical cases on a surgical service. World J Surg. 2014 Jul; 38(7):1664-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.321
  9. History and evolution of surgical ethics: John Gregory to the twenty-first century. World J Surg. 2014 Jul; 38(7):1568-73.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.321
  10. Living donation and cosmetic surgery: a double standard in medical ethics? J Clin Ethics. 2012; 23(2):110-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.270
  11. Orlo Clark and the rise of surgical ethics. World J Surg. 2009 Mar; 33(3):372-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.222
  12. Physicians and cancer patients: communication and advance directives. Cancer Treat Res. 2008; 140:13-28.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.205
  13. Decision-Making in Surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2024 Jun; 117(6):1087-1094.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.156
  14. Two Physician Consent in Surgery. Ann Surg. 2023 08 01; 278(2):e214-e216.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.148
  15. How Should Shared Decision Making Be Taught? AMA J Ethics. 2020 05 01; 22(5):E388-394.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.120
  16. Physicians and cancer patients: communication and advance directives. Cancer Treat Res. 2000; 102:1-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.118
  17. Surgical ethics and the future of surgical practice. Surgery. 2018 01; 163(1):1-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.101
  18. Surgical Professionalism: The Inspiring Surgeon of the Modern Era. Ann Surg. 2016 Mar; 263(3):428-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.090
  19. Incidental thyroid nodules and thyroid cancer: considerations before determining management. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Jun; 141(6):566-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.086
  20. The "call for help": intraoperative consultation and the surgeon-patient relationship. J Am Coll Surg. 2014 Dec; 219(6):1181-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.081
  21. What do you tell the family who asks, 'What went wrong?' The truth and nothing but the truth. J Perinatol. 2010 Aug; 30(8):513-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.061
  22. Communicating errors. Cancer Treat Res. 2008; 140:195-213.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  23. Ethical issues in surgical treatment and research. Curr Probl Surg. 2003 Jul; 40(7):353-448.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  24. Advance directive use among patients undergoing selected high-risk surgical procedures. Qual Manag Health Care. 1999; 7(4):1-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  25. Quality of life in thyroid cancer-assessment of physician perceptions. J Surg Res. 2018 06; 226:94-99.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.