The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Christopher Daugherty to Research Subjects

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Christopher Daugherty has written about Research Subjects.
Connection Strength

0.820
  1. Quantitative analysis of ethical issues in phase I trials: a survey interview of 144 advanced cancer patients. IRB. 2000 May-Jun; 22(3):6-14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.152
  2. Study of cohort-specific consent and patient control in phase I cancer trials. J Clin Oncol. 1998 Jul; 16(7):2305-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.134
  3. Learning from our patients: one participant's impact on clinical trial research and informed consent. Ann Intern Med. 1997 Jun 01; 126(11):892-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.124
  4. Hope and the limits of research. Hastings Cent Rep. 1996 Sep-Oct; 26(5):20; discussion 20-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.118
  5. Human subjects protection: an event monitoring committee for research studies of girls from breast cancer families. J Adolesc Health. 2014 Sep; 55(3):352-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.100
  6. Attitudes toward research participation and investigator conflicts of interest among advanced cancer patients participating in early phase clinical trials. J Clin Oncol. 2007 Aug 10; 25(23):3488-94.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.063
  7. Referral and decision making among advanced cancer patients participating in Phase I trials at a single institution. J Clin Ethics. 2001; 12(1):31-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  8. Impact of therapeutic research on informed consent and the ethics of clinical trials: a medical oncology perspective. J Clin Oncol. 1999 May; 17(5):1601-17.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  9. Perceptions of cancer patients and their physicians involved in phase I trials. J Clin Oncol. 1995 May; 13(5):1062-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  10. Pushing the envelope: informed consent in phase I trials. Ann Oncol. 1995 Apr; 6(4):321-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.