Kenneth Alexander to Contrast Sensitivity
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Kenneth Alexander has written about Contrast Sensitivity.
Connection Strength
3.581
-
Spatial contrast sensitivity in dynamic and static additive luminance noise. Vision Res. 2010 Sep 15; 50(19):1957-65.
Score: 0.347
-
Determinants of contrast sensitivity for the tumbling E and Landolt C. Optom Vis Sci. 2010 Jan; 87(1):28-36.
Score: 0.334
-
Contrast thresholds in additive luminance noise: Effect of noise temporal characteristics. Vision Res. 2009 May; 49(11):1389-96.
Score: 0.318
-
Effect of contrast on the frequency response of synchronous period doubling. Vision Res. 2007 Feb; 47(4):555-63.
Score: 0.268
-
Contrast sensitivity for letter optotypes vs. gratings under conditions biased toward parvocellular and magnocellular pathways. Vision Res. 2006 May; 46(10):1574-84.
Score: 0.249
-
Contrast response properties of magnocellular and parvocellular pathways in retinitis pigmentosa assessed by the visual evoked potential. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005 Aug; 46(8):2967-73.
Score: 0.246
-
Characteristics of contrast processing deficits in X-linked retinoschisis. Vision Res. 2005 Jul; 45(16):2095-107.
Score: 0.245
-
Contrast-processing deficits in melanoma-associated retinopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004 Jan; 45(1):305-10.
Score: 0.220
-
Deficits in temporal integration for contrast processing in retinitis pigmentosa. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003 Jul; 44(7):3163-9.
Score: 0.213
-
Contrast discrimination deficits in retinitis pigmentosa are greater for stimuli that favor the magnocellular pathway. Vision Res. 2001 Mar; 41(5):671-83.
Score: 0.181
-
Effect of noise contrast polarity and temporal asynchrony on visual sensitivity. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 1998 Nov; 15(11):2801-8.
Score: 0.154
-
Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity for individual Sloan letters. Vision Res. 1997 Mar; 37(6):813-9.
Score: 0.137
-
Visual acuity vs letter contrast sensitivity in retinitis pigmentosa. Vision Res. 1995 May; 35(10):1495-9.
Score: 0.121
-
Spatial-frequency characteristics of letter identification. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 1994 Sep; 11(9):2375-82.
Score: 0.115
-
Equivalent intrinsic noise, sampling efficiency, and contrast sensitivity in patients with retinitis pigmentosa. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Jun 03; 54(6):3857-62.
Score: 0.106
-
Spatial frequencies used in Landolt C orientation judgments: relation to inferred magnocellular and parvocellular pathways. Vision Res. 2008 Nov; 48(26):2615-24.
Score: 0.074
-
Contrast sensitivity deficits in inferred magnocellular and parvocellular pathways in retinitis pigmentosa. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004 Dec; 45(12):4510-9.
Score: 0.059
-
Comparison of contrast sensitivity, visual acuity, and Humphrey visual field testing in patients with glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2003 Apr; 12(2):134-8.
Score: 0.052
-
Coherence and the judgment of spatial displacements in retinitis pigmentosa. Vision Res. 1999 Jun; 39(13):2267-74.
Score: 0.040
-
Discrimination of spatial displacements by patients with retinitis pigmentosa. Vision Res. 1998 Apr; 38(8):1171-81.
Score: 0.037
-
Intraocular light scatter in patients with retinitis pigmentosa. Vision Res. 1996 Nov; 36(22):3703-9.
Score: 0.034
-
Effect of spatial sampling on grating resolution and letter identification. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 1995 Sep; 12(9):1825-33.
Score: 0.031