The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Daniel Sulmasy to Aged

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Daniel Sulmasy has written about Aged.
Daniel Sulmasy
Connection Strength
0.793
Aged
  1. Reply to: Frailty and ethics at the end of life: The importance of a comprehensive assessment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024 Sep; 72(9):2885-2887.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.067
  2. Drugs, delirium, and ethics at the end of life. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024 Jul; 72(7):1964-1972.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.065
  3. Rationing With Respect to Age During a Pandemic: A Comparative Analysis of State Pandemic Preparedness Plans. Chest. 2022 02; 161(2):504-513.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  4. Perceptions of control and unrealistic optimism in early-phase cancer trials. J Med Ethics. 2018 02; 44(2):121-127.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  5. Variations in Unrealistic Optimism Between Acceptors and Decliners of Early Phase Cancer Trials. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2017 10; 12(4):280-288.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  6. A Chinese version of the Spiritual Needs Assessment for patients survey instrument. J Palliat Med. 2012 Dec; 15(12):1297-315.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  7. The Spiritual Needs Assessment for Patients (SNAP): development and validation of a comprehensive instrument to assess unmet spiritual needs. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2012 Jul; 44(1):44-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  8. Family understanding of seriously-ill patient preferences for family involvement in healthcare decision making. J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Aug; 26(8):881-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  9. Unrealistic optimism in early-phase oncology trials. IRB. 2011 Jan-Feb; 33(1):1-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  10. Patients' attitudes to informed consent for genomic research with donated samples. Cancer Invest. 2010 Aug; 28(7):726-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  11. Ethical analysis of withdrawing ventricular assist device support. Mayo Clin Proc. 2010 Sep; 85(9):791-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  12. Development and validation of the Family Decision-Making Self-Efficacy Scale. Palliat Support Care. 2009 Sep; 7(3):315-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  13. Researchers' preferences and attitudes on ethical aspects of genomics research: a comparative study between the USA and Spain. J Med Ethics. 2009 Apr; 35(4):251-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  14. Decision-making in patients with advanced cancer compared with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Med Ethics. 2008 Sep; 34(9):664-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  15. When patients lack capacity: the roles that patients with terminal diagnoses would choose for their physicians and loved ones in making medical decisions. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2005 Oct; 30(4):342-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  16. The quality of care plans for patients with do-not-resuscitate orders. Arch Intern Med. 2004 Jul 26; 164(14):1573-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  17. Estimating population impact of state triage policies restricting healthcare access for older adults with chronic conditions. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024 01; 72(1):294-296.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  18. Factors associated with the time nurses spend at the bedsides of seriously ill patients with poor prognoses. Med Care. 2003 Apr; 41(4):458-66.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  19. Patients' ratings of quality and satisfaction with care at the end of life. Arch Intern Med. 2002 Oct 14; 162(18):2098-104.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  20. Can a pain management and palliative care curriculum improve the opioid prescribing practices of medical residents? J Gen Intern Med. 2002 Aug; 17(8):625-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  21. A scale for measuring patient perceptions of the quality of end-of-life care and satisfaction with treatment: the reliability and validity of QUEST. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2002 Jun; 23(6):458-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  22. Do patients die because they have DNR orders, or do they have DNR orders because they are going to die? Med Care. 1999 Aug; 37(8):719-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  23. End-of-life decision making: when patients and surrogates disagree. J Clin Ethics. 1999; 10(4):286-93.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  24. Physician-Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia: Emerging Issues From a Global Perspective. J Palliat Care. 2018 Oct; 33(4):197-203.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  25. The accuracy of substituted judgments in patients with terminal diagnoses. Ann Intern Med. 1998 Apr 15; 128(8):621-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  26. Ethical Analysis of Withdrawing Total Artificial Heart Support. Mayo Clin Proc. 2017 05; 92(5):719-725.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  27. A computerized system for entering orders to limit treatment: implementation and evaluation. J Clin Ethics. 1997; 8(3):258-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  28. Strategies to promote the use of advance directives in a residency outpatient practice. J Gen Intern Med. 1996 Nov; 11(11):657-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  29. Patient and caregiver characteristics related to completion of advance directives in terminally ill patients. Palliat Support Care. 2017 02; 15(1):12-19.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  30. Decision-Making of Patients With Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators at End of Life: Family Members' Experiences. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2017 Jul; 34(6):518-523.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  31. Dispositional optimism and therapeutic expectations in early-phase oncology trials. Cancer. 2016 Apr 15; 122(8):1238-46.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  32. Symptoms and fear in heart failure patients approaching end of life: a mixed methods study. J Clin Nurs. 2015 Nov; 24(21-22):3215-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  33. Symptom frequency, severity, and quality of life among persons with three disease trajectories: cancer, ALS, and CHF. Appl Nurs Res. 2015 Nov; 28(4):311-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  34. More talk, less paper: predicting the accuracy of substituted judgments. Am J Med. 1994 May; 96(5):432-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  35. Patients' perceptions of the quality of informed consent for common medical procedures. J Clin Ethics. 1994; 5(3):189-94.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  36. A Web-based communication aid for patients with cancer: the CONNECT Study. Cancer. 2013 Apr 01; 119(7):1437-45.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  37. Dignity in end-of-life care: results of a national survey of U.S. physicians. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2012 Sep; 44(3):331-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  38. Cancer patient preferences for quality and length of life. Cancer. 2008 Dec 15; 113(12):3459-66.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  39. Understanding of an aggregate probability statement by patients who are offered participation in Phase I clinical trials. Cancer. 2005 Jan 01; 103(1):140-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  40. Perceptions of patients and physicians regarding phase I cancer clinical trials: implications for physician-patient communication. J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jul 01; 21(13):2589-96.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  41. The correlation between patient characteristics and expectations of benefit from Phase I clinical trials. Cancer. 2003 Jul 01; 98(1):166-75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  42. Life-sustaining treatments: what do physicians want and do they express their wishes to others? J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003 Jul; 51(7):961-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.