Daniel Sulmasy to Adult
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Daniel Sulmasy has written about Adult.
Connection Strength
0.475
-
Variations in Unrealistic Optimism Between Acceptors and Decliners of Early Phase Cancer Trials. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2017 10; 12(4):280-288.
Score: 0.036
-
The Spiritual Needs Assessment for Patients (SNAP): development and validation of a comprehensive instrument to assess unmet spiritual needs. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2012 Jul; 44(1):44-51.
Score: 0.025
-
Family understanding of seriously-ill patient preferences for family involvement in healthcare decision making. J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Aug; 26(8):881-6.
Score: 0.023
-
Unrealistic optimism in early-phase oncology trials. IRB. 2011 Jan-Feb; 33(1):1-8.
Score: 0.023
-
Patients' attitudes to informed consent for genomic research with donated samples. Cancer Invest. 2010 Aug; 28(7):726-34.
Score: 0.022
-
Ethical analysis of withdrawing ventricular assist device support. Mayo Clin Proc. 2010 Sep; 85(9):791-7.
Score: 0.022
-
Development and validation of the Family Decision-Making Self-Efficacy Scale. Palliat Support Care. 2009 Sep; 7(3):315-21.
Score: 0.021
-
Researchers' preferences and attitudes on ethical aspects of genomics research: a comparative study between the USA and Spain. J Med Ethics. 2009 Apr; 35(4):251-7.
Score: 0.020
-
Decision-making in patients with advanced cancer compared with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Med Ethics. 2008 Sep; 34(9):664-8.
Score: 0.019
-
Beliefs and attitudes of nurses and physicians about do not resuscitate orders and who should speak to patients and families about them. Crit Care Med. 2008 Jun; 36(6):1817-22.
Score: 0.019
-
U.S. medical students' perceptions of the adequacy of their schools' curricular attention to care at the end of life: 1998-2006. J Palliat Med. 2008 Jun; 11(5):707-16.
Score: 0.019
-
Physicians' confidence in discussing do not resuscitate orders with patients and surrogates. J Med Ethics. 2008 Feb; 34(2):96-101.
Score: 0.019
-
Terri Schiavo and the Roman Catholic tradition of forgoing extraordinary means of care. J Law Med Ethics. 2005; 33(2):359-62.
Score: 0.015
-
Confidence and knowledge of medical ethics among interns entering residency in different specialties. J Clin Ethics. 2005; 16(3):230-5.
Score: 0.015
-
Patients' ratings of quality and satisfaction with care at the end of life. Arch Intern Med. 2002 Oct 14; 162(18):2098-104.
Score: 0.013
-
Sedation, alimentation, hydration, and equivocation: careful conversation about care at the end of life. Ann Intern Med. 2002 Jun 04; 136(11):845-9.
Score: 0.013
-
I was sick and you came to visit me: time spent at the bedsides of seriously ill patients with poor prognoses. Am J Med. 2001 Oct 01; 111(5):385-9.
Score: 0.012
-
Decisions to Withdraw Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support: Patient Characteristics and Ethical Considerations. Mayo Clin Proc. 2019 04; 94(4):620-627.
Score: 0.010
-
End-of-life decision making: when patients and surrogates disagree. J Clin Ethics. 1999; 10(4):286-93.
Score: 0.010
-
Physician-Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia: Emerging Issues From a Global Perspective. J Palliat Care. 2018 Oct; 33(4):197-203.
Score: 0.010
-
The accuracy of substituted judgments in patients with terminal diagnoses. Ann Intern Med. 1998 Apr 15; 128(8):621-9.
Score: 0.009
-
The preparedness of students to discuss end-of-life issues with patients. Acad Med. 1998 Apr; 73(4):418-22.
Score: 0.009
-
Ethical Analysis of Withdrawing Total Artificial Heart Support. Mayo Clin Proc. 2017 05; 92(5):719-725.
Score: 0.009
-
Strategies to promote the use of advance directives in a residency outpatient practice. J Gen Intern Med. 1996 Nov; 11(11):657-63.
Score: 0.009
-
Decision-Making of Patients With Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators at End of Life: Family Members' Experiences. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2017 Jul; 34(6):518-523.
Score: 0.008
-
Dispositional optimism and therapeutic expectations in early-phase oncology trials. Cancer. 2016 Apr 15; 122(8):1238-46.
Score: 0.008
-
Symptoms and fear in heart failure patients approaching end of life: a mixed methods study. J Clin Nurs. 2015 Nov; 24(21-22):3215-23.
Score: 0.008
-
Symptom frequency, severity, and quality of life among persons with three disease trajectories: cancer, ALS, and CHF. Appl Nurs Res. 2015 Nov; 28(4):311-5.
Score: 0.008
-
More talk, less paper: predicting the accuracy of substituted judgments. Am J Med. 1994 May; 96(5):432-8.
Score: 0.007
-
Patients' perceptions of the quality of informed consent for common medical procedures. J Clin Ethics. 1994; 5(3):189-94.
Score: 0.007
-
Dignity in end-of-life care: results of a national survey of U.S. physicians. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2012 Sep; 44(3):331-9.
Score: 0.006
-
Cancer patient preferences for quality and length of life. Cancer. 2008 Dec 15; 113(12):3459-66.
Score: 0.005
-
Understanding of an aggregate probability statement by patients who are offered participation in Phase I clinical trials. Cancer. 2005 Jan 01; 103(1):140-7.
Score: 0.004
-
Perceptions of patients and physicians regarding phase I cancer clinical trials: implications for physician-patient communication. J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jul 01; 21(13):2589-96.
Score: 0.003
-
The correlation between patient characteristics and expectations of benefit from Phase I clinical trials. Cancer. 2003 Jul 01; 98(1):166-75.
Score: 0.003
-
Measuring the effects of managed care on physicians' perceptions of their personal financial incentives. Inquiry. 2000; 37(2):134-45.
Score: 0.003