Daniel Sulmasy to Decision Making
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Daniel Sulmasy has written about Decision Making.
Connection Strength
3.671
-
The Trial of Ascertaining Individual Preferences for Loved Ones' Role in End-of-Life Decisions (TAILORED) Study: A Randomized Controlled Trial to Improve Surrogate Decision Making. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017 10; 54(4):455-465.
Score: 0.386
-
Recommendations to Surrogates at the End of Life: A Critical Narrative Review of the Empirical Literature and a Normative Analysis. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2015 Nov; 50(5):693-700.
Score: 0.333
-
On substituted arguments. J Med Ethics. 2015 Sep; 41(9):732-3.
Score: 0.326
-
Family understanding of seriously-ill patient preferences for family involvement in healthcare decision making. J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Aug; 26(8):881-6.
Score: 0.250
-
Substituted interests and best judgments: an integrated model of surrogate decision making. JAMA. 2010 Nov 03; 304(17):1946-7.
Score: 0.243
-
Development and validation of the Family Decision-Making Self-Efficacy Scale. Palliat Support Care. 2009 Sep; 7(3):315-21.
Score: 0.224
-
Family health care decision making and self-efficacy with patients with ALS at the end of life. Palliat Support Care. 2008 Sep; 6(3):273-80.
Score: 0.209
-
Decision-making in patients with advanced cancer compared with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Med Ethics. 2008 Sep; 34(9):664-8.
Score: 0.209
-
How would terminally ill patients have others make decisions for them in the event of decisional incapacity? A longitudinal study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007 Dec; 55(12):1981-8.
Score: 0.198
-
Heart and soul: the case of the conjoined twins. America (NY). 2000 Dec 02; 183(18):12-4.
Score: 0.122
-
Statutes Governing Default Surrogate Decision Making for Mental Health Treatment. Psychiatr Serv. 2021 01 01; 72(1):81-84.
Score: 0.121
-
End-of-life decision making: when patients and surrogates disagree. J Clin Ethics. 1999; 10(4):286-93.
Score: 0.107
-
The accuracy of substituted judgments in patients with terminal diagnoses. Ann Intern Med. 1998 Apr 15; 128(8):621-9.
Score: 0.102
-
Who Decides When a Patient Can't? Statutes on Alternate Decision Makers. N Engl J Med. 2017 Apr 13; 376(15):1478-1482.
Score: 0.095
-
Decision-Making of Patients With Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators at End of Life: Family Members' Experiences. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2017 Jul; 34(6):518-523.
Score: 0.088
-
Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage and the challenge of surgical decision making: a review. Neurosurg Focus. 2013 May; 34(5):E1.
Score: 0.072
-
A Web-based communication aid for patients with cancer: the CONNECT Study. Cancer. 2013 Apr 01; 119(7):1437-45.
Score: 0.071
-
Speaking of the value of life. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2011 Jun; 21(2):181-99.
Score: 0.063
-
Within you/without you: biotechnology, ontology, and ethics. J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Jan; 23 Suppl 1:69-72.
Score: 0.050
-
When patients lack capacity: the roles that patients with terminal diagnoses would choose for their physicians and loved ones in making medical decisions. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2005 Oct; 30(4):342-53.
Score: 0.043
-
Understanding of an aggregate probability statement by patients who are offered participation in Phase I clinical trials. Cancer. 2005 Jan 01; 103(1):140-7.
Score: 0.040
-
An exploration of relative health stock in advanced cancer patients. Med Decis Making. 2004 Nov-Dec; 24(6):614-24.
Score: 0.040
-
"They Would Lift My Spirits": Sources of Support for Family Surrogate Decision-Makers at the End of Life. J Hosp Palliat Nurs. 2023 06 01; 25(3):119-123.
Score: 0.036
-
Decision-making Laws for "Unrepresented" Patients. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2020 11; 17(11):1484-1486.
Score: 0.030
-
Killing and allowing to die: another look. J Law Med Ethics. 1998; 26(1):55-64, 4.
Score: 0.025
-
Ethical Analysis of Withdrawing Total Artificial Heart Support. Mayo Clin Proc. 2017 05; 92(5):719-725.
Score: 0.024
-
Informed consent in emergency medicine: ethics under fire. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 1996 Feb; 14(1):245-54.
Score: 0.022
-
Knowledge, confidence, and attitudes regarding medical ethics: how do faculty and housestaff compare? Acad Med. 1995 Nov; 70(11):1038-40.
Score: 0.021
-
More talk, less paper: predicting the accuracy of substituted judgments. Am J Med. 1994 May; 96(5):432-8.
Score: 0.019
-
Ethical considerations. Crit Care Clin. 1993 Oct; 9(4):775-89.
Score: 0.019
-
A randomized trial of ethics education for medical house officers. J Med Ethics. 1993 Sep; 19(3):157-63.
Score: 0.018
-
By whose authority? Emerging issues in medical ethics. Theol Stud. 1989 Mar; 50:95-119.
Score: 0.014
-
Cancer patient preferences for quality and length of life. Cancer. 2008 Dec 15; 113(12):3459-66.
Score: 0.013
-
The surrogate's experience in authorizing a do not resuscitate order. Palliat Support Care. 2008 Mar; 6(1):13-9.
Score: 0.013
-
Perceptions of patients and physicians regarding phase I cancer clinical trials: implications for physician-patient communication. J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jul 01; 21(13):2589-96.
Score: 0.009
-
The correlation between patient characteristics and expectations of benefit from Phase I clinical trials. Cancer. 2003 Jul 01; 98(1):166-75.
Score: 0.009
-
Discussing religious and spiritual issues at the end of life: a practical guide for physicians. JAMA. 2002 Feb 13; 287(6):749-54.
Score: 0.008