The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Daniel Sulmasy to Middle Aged

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Daniel Sulmasy has written about Middle Aged.
Connection Strength

0.813
  1. Spiritual Needs and Perception of Quality of Care and Satisfaction With Care in Hematology/Medical Oncology Patients: A Multicultural Assessment. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 01; 55(1):56-64.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  2. Perceptions of control and unrealistic optimism in early-phase cancer trials. J Med Ethics. 2018 02; 44(2):121-127.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  3. Variations in Unrealistic Optimism Between Acceptors and Decliners of Early Phase Cancer Trials. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2017 10; 12(4):280-288.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  4. The Trial of Ascertaining Individual Preferences for Loved Ones' Role in End-of-Life Decisions (TAILORED) Study: A Randomized Controlled Trial to Improve Surrogate Decision Making. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017 10; 54(4):455-465.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  5. A Chinese version of the Spiritual Needs Assessment for patients survey instrument. J Palliat Med. 2012 Dec; 15(12):1297-315.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  6. The Spiritual Needs Assessment for Patients (SNAP): development and validation of a comprehensive instrument to assess unmet spiritual needs. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2012 Jul; 44(1):44-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  7. What research participants want to know about genetic research results: the impact of "genetic exceptionalism". J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2011 Sep; 6(3):39-46.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  8. Family understanding of seriously-ill patient preferences for family involvement in healthcare decision making. J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Aug; 26(8):881-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  9. The use of advance directives among patients with left ventricular assist devices. Hosp Pract (1995). 2011 Feb; 39(1):78-84.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  10. Unrealistic optimism in early-phase oncology trials. IRB. 2011 Jan-Feb; 33(1):1-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  11. The culture of faith and hope: patients' justifications for their high estimations of expected therapeutic benefit when enrolling in early phase oncology trials. Cancer. 2010 Aug 01; 116(15):3702-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  12. Patients' attitudes to informed consent for genomic research with donated samples. Cancer Invest. 2010 Aug; 28(7):726-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  13. Ethical analysis of withdrawing ventricular assist device support. Mayo Clin Proc. 2010 Sep; 85(9):791-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  14. Development and validation of the Family Decision-Making Self-Efficacy Scale. Palliat Support Care. 2009 Sep; 7(3):315-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  15. Researchers' preferences and attitudes on ethical aspects of genomics research: a comparative study between the USA and Spain. J Med Ethics. 2009 Apr; 35(4):251-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  16. Decision-making in patients with advanced cancer compared with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Med Ethics. 2008 Sep; 34(9):664-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  17. Beliefs and attitudes of nurses and physicians about do not resuscitate orders and who should speak to patients and families about them. Crit Care Med. 2008 Jun; 36(6):1817-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  18. Physicians' confidence in discussing do not resuscitate orders with patients and surrogates. J Med Ethics. 2008 Feb; 34(2):96-101.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  19. Is failure to meet spiritual needs associated with cancer patients' perceptions of quality of care and their satisfaction with care? J Clin Oncol. 2007 Dec 20; 25(36):5753-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  20. How would terminally ill patients have others make decisions for them in the event of decisional incapacity? A longitudinal study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007 Dec; 55(12):1981-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  21. When patients lack capacity: the roles that patients with terminal diagnoses would choose for their physicians and loved ones in making medical decisions. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2005 Oct; 30(4):342-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  22. Factors associated with the time nurses spend at the bedsides of seriously ill patients with poor prognoses. Med Care. 2003 Apr; 41(4):458-66.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  23. Patients' ratings of quality and satisfaction with care at the end of life. Arch Intern Med. 2002 Oct 14; 162(18):2098-104.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  24. Can a pain management and palliative care curriculum improve the opioid prescribing practices of medical residents? J Gen Intern Med. 2002 Aug; 17(8):625-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  25. Sedation, alimentation, hydration, and equivocation: careful conversation about care at the end of life. Ann Intern Med. 2002 Jun 04; 136(11):845-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  26. Addressing the religious and spiritual needs of dying patients. West J Med. 2001 Oct; 175(4):251-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  27. I was sick and you came to visit me: time spent at the bedsides of seriously ill patients with poor prognoses. Am J Med. 2001 Oct 01; 111(5):385-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  28. Decisions to Withdraw Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support: Patient Characteristics and Ethical Considerations. Mayo Clin Proc. 2019 04; 94(4):620-627.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  29. End-of-life decision making: when patients and surrogates disagree. J Clin Ethics. 1999; 10(4):286-93.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  30. Physician-Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia: Emerging Issues From a Global Perspective. J Palliat Care. 2018 Oct; 33(4):197-203.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  31. The accuracy of substituted judgments in patients with terminal diagnoses. Ann Intern Med. 1998 Apr 15; 128(8):621-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  32. The Views of Clergy Regarding Ethical Controversies in Care at the End of Life. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 01; 55(1):65-74.e9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  33. Ethical Analysis of Withdrawing Total Artificial Heart Support. Mayo Clin Proc. 2017 05; 92(5):719-725.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  34. Strategies to promote the use of advance directives in a residency outpatient practice. J Gen Intern Med. 1996 Nov; 11(11):657-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  35. Patient and caregiver characteristics related to completion of advance directives in terminally ill patients. Palliat Support Care. 2017 02; 15(1):12-19.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  36. Decision-Making of Patients With Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators at End of Life: Family Members' Experiences. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2017 Jul; 34(6):518-523.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  37. Dispositional optimism and therapeutic expectations in early-phase oncology trials. Cancer. 2016 Apr 15; 122(8):1238-46.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  38. Symptoms and fear in heart failure patients approaching end of life: a mixed methods study. J Clin Nurs. 2015 Nov; 24(21-22):3215-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  39. Symptom frequency, severity, and quality of life among persons with three disease trajectories: cancer, ALS, and CHF. Appl Nurs Res. 2015 Nov; 28(4):311-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  40. Long-term effects of ethics education on the quality of care for patients who have do-not-resuscitate orders. J Gen Intern Med. 1994 Nov; 9(11):622-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  41. More talk, less paper: predicting the accuracy of substituted judgments. Am J Med. 1994 May; 96(5):432-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  42. Patients' perceptions of the quality of informed consent for common medical procedures. J Clin Ethics. 1994; 5(3):189-94.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  43. A Web-based communication aid for patients with cancer: the CONNECT Study. Cancer. 2013 Apr 01; 119(7):1437-45.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  44. Research participants' high expectations of benefit in early-phase oncology trials: are we asking the right question? J Clin Oncol. 2012 Dec 10; 30(35):4396-400.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  45. Dignity in end-of-life care: results of a national survey of U.S. physicians. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2012 Sep; 44(3):331-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  46. Cancer patient preferences for quality and length of life. Cancer. 2008 Dec 15; 113(12):3459-66.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  47. Using health communication best practices to develop a web-based provider-patient communication aid: the CONNECT study. Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Jun; 71(3):378-87.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  48. Expectations of benefit in early-phase clinical trials: implications for assessing the adequacy of informed consent. Med Decis Making. 2008 Jul-Aug; 28(4):575-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  49. Understanding of an aggregate probability statement by patients who are offered participation in Phase I clinical trials. Cancer. 2005 Jan 01; 103(1):140-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  50. An exploration of relative health stock in advanced cancer patients. Med Decis Making. 2004 Nov-Dec; 24(6):614-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  51. Perceptions of patients and physicians regarding phase I cancer clinical trials: implications for physician-patient communication. J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jul 01; 21(13):2589-96.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  52. The correlation between patient characteristics and expectations of benefit from Phase I clinical trials. Cancer. 2003 Jul 01; 98(1):166-75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  53. Life-sustaining treatments: what do physicians want and do they express their wishes to others? J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003 Jul; 51(7):961-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004
  54. Patient expectations of benefit from phase I clinical trials: linguistic considerations in diagnosing a therapeutic misconception. Theor Med Bioeth. 2003; 24(4):329-44.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
  55. The timing of do-not-resuscitate orders and hospital costs. J Gen Intern Med. 1999 Mar; 14(3):190-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.003
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.