Daniel Sulmasy to Humans
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Daniel Sulmasy has written about Humans.
Connection Strength
2.224
-
Reply to: Frailty and ethics at the end of life: The importance of a comprehensive assessment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024 Sep; 72(9):2885-2887.
Score: 0.031
-
A Biophilosophical Approach to the Determination of Brain Death. Chest. 2024 Apr; 165(4):959-966.
Score: 0.031
-
Physicians, Spirituality, and Compassionate Patient Care. N Engl J Med. 2024 Mar 21; 390(12):1061-1063.
Score: 0.031
-
Learning from COVID-19 triage schemes to face the next public health emergency. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024 Apr; 72(4):1298-1301.
Score: 0.030
-
Drugs, delirium, and ethics at the end of life. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024 Jul; 72(7):1964-1972.
Score: 0.030
-
Addressing Challenges With Sedation in End-of-Life Care. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2024 Apr; 67(4):346-349.
Score: 0.030
-
Rethinking Brain Death-Why "Dead Enough" Is Not Good Enough: The UDDA Revision Series. Neurology. 2023 08 15; 101(7):320-325.
Score: 0.029
-
End-of-life practices: An ethical framework for clinicians. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2023 08; 42(4):101216.
Score: 0.029
-
Death Lost in Translation. Am J Bioeth. 2023 02; 23(2):17-19.
Score: 0.028
-
ICU Care in a Pandemic. Hastings Cent Rep. 2021 11; 51(6):58.
Score: 0.026
-
Health Care Professionals' Spirituality and COVID-19: Meaning, Compassion, Relationship. JAMA. 2021 10 26; 326(16):1577-1578.
Score: 0.026
-
Rationing With Respect to Age During a Pandemic: A Comparative Analysis of State Pandemic Preparedness Plans. Chest. 2022 02; 161(2):504-513.
Score: 0.026
-
Life-Years & Rationing in the Covid-19 Pandemic: A Critical Analysis. Hastings Cent Rep. 2021 09; 51(5):18-29.
Score: 0.026
-
Are SARS-CoV-2 Human Challenge Trials Ethical? JAMA Intern Med. 2021 08 01; 181(8):1031-1032.
Score: 0.026
-
COUNTERPOINT: Is It Ethically Permissible to Unilaterally Withdraw Life-Sustaining Treatments for Reallocation During Crisis Standards of Care? No. Chest. 2021 06; 159(6):2167-2169.
Score: 0.025
-
Advance Care Planning and "The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock". JAMA Intern Med. 2020 06 01; 180(6):813-814.
Score: 0.024
-
Principled decisions and virtuous care: an ethical assessment of the SIAARTI Guidelines for allocating intensive care resources. Minerva Anestesiol. 2020 08; 86(8):872-876.
Score: 0.024
-
We Need More Wisdom, Not More Paper: A Reply to Merel and Gaster. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 07; 68(7):1609-1610.
Score: 0.023
-
Why Dementia-Specific Advance Directives Are a Misguided Idea. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 07; 68(7):1603-1605.
Score: 0.023
-
Should Institutions Disclose the Names of Employees with Covid-19? Hastings Cent Rep. 2020 05; 50(3):25-27.
Score: 0.023
-
Conscience, tolerance, and pluralism in health care. Theor Med Bioeth. 2019 Dec; 40(6):507-521.
Score: 0.023
-
The genealogy of death: A chronology of U.S. organizations promoting euthanasia and assisted suicide. Palliat Support Care. 2019 10; 17(5):604-608.
Score: 0.023
-
Whole-brain death and integration: realigning the ontological concept with clinical diagnostic tests. Theor Med Bioeth. 2019 Oct; 40(5):455-481.
Score: 0.023
-
Physician-Assisted Suicide and the Perils of Empirical Ethical Research. JAMA Netw Open. 2019 08 02; 2(8):e198628.
Score: 0.022
-
Physician-Assisted Suicide: Against Medical Neutrality. J Gen Intern Med. 2019 08; 34(8):1372.
Score: 0.022
-
Ethics and Evidence. J Clin Ethics. 2019 Spring; 30(1):56-66.
Score: 0.022
-
Unlike Diamonds, Defibrillators Aren't Forever: Why It Is Sometimes Ethical to Deactivate Cardiac Implantable Electrical Devices. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2019 04; 28(2):338-346.
Score: 0.022
-
Why the Common-Sense Distinction between Killing and Allowing-to-Die Is So Easy to Grasp but So Hard to Explain. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2019 04; 28(2):353-358.
Score: 0.022
-
Sedation and care at the end of life. Theor Med Bioeth. 2018 06; 39(3):171-180.
Score: 0.021
-
The last low whispers of our dead: when is it ethically justifiable to render a patient unconscious until death? Theor Med Bioeth. 2018 06; 39(3):233-263.
Score: 0.021
-
Physician-Assisted Suicide: Why Neutrality by Organized Medicine Is Neither Neutral Nor Appropriate. J Gen Intern Med. 2018 08; 33(8):1394-1399.
Score: 0.020
-
Italy's New Advance Directive Law: When in Rome…. JAMA Intern Med. 2018 05 01; 178(5):607-608.
Score: 0.020
-
Death and dignity in Catholic Christian thought. Med Health Care Philos. 2017 Dec; 20(4):537-543.
Score: 0.020
-
Context and scale: Distinctions for improving debates about physician "rationing". Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2017 08 29; 12(1):5.
Score: 0.019
-
Spiritual Needs and Perception of Quality of Care and Satisfaction With Care in Hematology/Medical Oncology Patients: A Multicultural Assessment. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 01; 55(1):56-64.e1.
Score: 0.019
-
Perceptions of control and unrealistic optimism in early-phase cancer trials. J Med Ethics. 2018 02; 44(2):121-127.
Score: 0.019
-
Variations in Unrealistic Optimism Between Acceptors and Decliners of Early Phase Cancer Trials. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2017 10; 12(4):280-288.
Score: 0.019
-
The Trial of Ascertaining Individual Preferences for Loved Ones' Role in End-of-Life Decisions (TAILORED) Study: A Randomized Controlled Trial to Improve Surrogate Decision Making. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017 10; 54(4):455-465.
Score: 0.019
-
Ethical Principles, Process, and the Work of Bioethics Commissions. Hastings Cent Rep. 2017 May; 47 Suppl 1:S50-S53.
Score: 0.019
-
Tolerance, Professional Judgment, and the Discretionary Space of the Physician. Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2017 Jan; 26(1):18-31.
Score: 0.019
-
Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide. JAMA. 2016 Oct 18; 316(15):1600.
Score: 0.018
-
Justice, Courage, and Truthfulness: Virtues That Medical Trainees Can and Must Learn. Fam Med. 2016 Jul; 48(7):511-6.
Score: 0.018
-
On Being a 21st Century Patient. Ann Intern Med. 2016 Mar 15; 164(6):446.
Score: 0.018
-
Ethical considerations for turning off pacemakers and defibrillators. Card Electrophysiol Clin. 2015 Sep; 7(3):547-55.
Score: 0.017
-
Recommendations to Surrogates at the End of Life: A Critical Narrative Review of the Empirical Literature and a Normative Analysis. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2015 Nov; 50(5):693-700.
Score: 0.017
-
In reply to Cayley. Acad Med. 2015 May; 90(5):547.
Score: 0.017
-
On substituted arguments. J Med Ethics. 2015 Sep; 41(9):732-3.
Score: 0.016
-
Back to the future: The AMA and religion, 1961-1974. Acad Med. 2014 Dec; 89(12):1603-9.
Score: 0.016
-
Eleanor Roosevelt's last days: a bioethical case study. Am J Med. 2015 Apr; 128(4):437-40.
Score: 0.016
-
Debating the oncologist's role in defining the value of cancer care: our duty is to our patients. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Dec 20; 32(36):4039-41.
Score: 0.016
-
Naked bodies, naked genomes: the special (but not exceptional) nature of genomic information. Genet Med. 2015 May; 17(5):331-6.
Score: 0.016
-
Edmund Pellegrino's philosophy and ethics of medicine: an overview. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2014 Jun; 24(2):105-12.
Score: 0.016
-
Religion in Organized Medicine: The AMA's Committee and Department of Medicine and Religion, 1961-1974. Perspect Biol Med. 2014; 57(3):393-414.
Score: 0.015
-
The varieties of human dignity: a logical and conceptual analysis. Med Health Care Philos. 2013 Nov; 16(4):937-44.
Score: 0.015
-
Moral status, justice, and the common morality: challenges for the principlist account of moral change. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2013 Sep; 23(3):275-96.
Score: 0.015
-
Ethos, mythos, and thanatos: spirituality and ethics at the end of life. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2013 Sep; 46(3):447-51.
Score: 0.015
-
A Chinese version of the Spiritual Needs Assessment for patients survey instrument. J Palliat Med. 2012 Dec; 15(12):1297-315.
Score: 0.014
-
The Spiritual Needs Assessment for Patients (SNAP): development and validation of a comprehensive instrument to assess unmet spiritual needs. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2012 Jul; 44(1):44-51.
Score: 0.014
-
Donation after cardiac death in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: stepping forward into uncertain waters. Ann Neurol. 2012 Feb; 71(2):151-3.
Score: 0.013
-
What research participants want to know about genetic research results: the impact of "genetic exceptionalism". J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2011 Sep; 6(3):39-46.
Score: 0.013
-
Speaking of the value of life. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2011 Jun; 21(2):181-99.
Score: 0.013
-
Family understanding of seriously-ill patient preferences for family involvement in healthcare decision making. J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Aug; 26(8):881-6.
Score: 0.013
-
The use of advance directives among patients with left ventricular assist devices. Hosp Pract (1995). 2011 Feb; 39(1):78-84.
Score: 0.012
-
Unrealistic optimism in early-phase oncology trials. IRB. 2011 Jan-Feb; 33(1):1-8.
Score: 0.012
-
Substituted interests and best judgments: an integrated model of surrogate decision making. JAMA. 2010 Nov 03; 304(17):1946-7.
Score: 0.012
-
The culture of faith and hope: patients' justifications for their high estimations of expected therapeutic benefit when enrolling in early phase oncology trials. Cancer. 2010 Aug 01; 116(15):3702-11.
Score: 0.012
-
Patients' attitudes to informed consent for genomic research with donated samples. Cancer Invest. 2010 Aug; 28(7):726-34.
Score: 0.012
-
Ethical analysis of withdrawing ventricular assist device support. Mayo Clin Proc. 2010 Sep; 85(9):791-7.
Score: 0.012
-
Justifying different levels of palliative sedation. Ann Intern Med. 2010 Mar 02; 152(5):332-3; author reply 333.
Score: 0.012
-
Improving the quality of spiritual care as a dimension of palliative care: the report of the Consensus Conference. J Palliat Med. 2009 Oct; 12(10):885-904.
Score: 0.011
-
Development and validation of the Family Decision-Making Self-Efficacy Scale. Palliat Support Care. 2009 Sep; 7(3):315-21.
Score: 0.011
-
Spirituality, religion, and clinical care. Chest. 2009 Jun; 135(6):1634-1642.
Score: 0.011
-
Researchers' preferences and attitudes on ethical aspects of genomics research: a comparative study between the USA and Spain. J Med Ethics. 2009 Apr; 35(4):251-7.
Score: 0.011
-
High quality care and ethical pay-for-performance: a Society of General Internal Medicine policy analysis. J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Jul; 24(7):854-9.
Score: 0.011
-
Deliberative Democracy and stem cell research in New York State: the good, the bad, and the ugly. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2009 Mar; 19(1):63-78.
Score: 0.011
-
Improving the quality of health care: who is responsible for what? JAMA. 2009 Jan 14; 301(2):215-7.
Score: 0.011
-
Family health care decision making and self-efficacy with patients with ALS at the end of life. Palliat Support Care. 2008 Sep; 6(3):273-80.
Score: 0.010
-
Decision-making in patients with advanced cancer compared with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Med Ethics. 2008 Sep; 34(9):664-8.
Score: 0.010
-
Beliefs and attitudes of nurses and physicians about do not resuscitate orders and who should speak to patients and families about them. Crit Care Med. 2008 Jun; 36(6):1817-22.
Score: 0.010
-
U.S. medical students' perceptions of the adequacy of their schools' curricular attention to care at the end of life: 1998-2006. J Palliat Med. 2008 Jun; 11(5):707-16.
Score: 0.010
-
Physicians' confidence in discussing do not resuscitate orders with patients and surrogates. J Med Ethics. 2008 Feb; 34(2):96-101.
Score: 0.010
-
Within you/without you: biotechnology, ontology, and ethics. J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Jan; 23 Suppl 1:69-72.
Score: 0.010
-
What is conscience and why is respect for it so important? Theor Med Bioeth. 2008; 29(3):135-49.
Score: 0.010
-
Is failure to meet spiritual needs associated with cancer patients' perceptions of quality of care and their satisfaction with care? J Clin Oncol. 2007 Dec 20; 25(36):5753-7.
Score: 0.010
-
What is a miracle? South Med J. 2007 Dec; 100(12):1223-8.
Score: 0.010
-
Distinguishing denial from authentic faith in miracles: a clinical-pastoral approach. South Med J. 2007 Dec; 100(12):1268-72.
Score: 0.010
-
How would terminally ill patients have others make decisions for them in the event of decisional incapacity? A longitudinal study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007 Dec; 55(12):1981-8.
Score: 0.010
-
Cancer care, money, and the value of life: whose justice? Which rationality? J Clin Oncol. 2007 Jan 10; 25(2):217-22.
Score: 0.009
-
A prospective trial of a new policy eliminating signed consent for do not resuscitate orders. J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Dec; 21(12):1261-8.
Score: 0.009
-
Promethean medicine: spirituality, stem cells, and cloning. South Med J. 2006 Dec; 99(12):1419-23.
Score: 0.009
-
Emergency contraception for women who have been raped: must catholics test for ovulation, or is testing for pregnancy morally sufficient? Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2006 Dec; 16(4):305-31.
Score: 0.009
-
Spiritual issues in the care of dying patients: ". . . it's okay between me and god". JAMA. 2006 Sep 20; 296(11):1385-92.
Score: 0.009
-
Dignity, Vulnerability, and medical error. Health Prog. 2006 Jan-Feb; 87(1):12-4.
Score: 0.009
-
The logos of the genome: genomes as parts of organisms. Theor Med Bioeth. 2006; 27(6):535-40.
Score: 0.009
-
When patients lack capacity: the roles that patients with terminal diagnoses would choose for their physicians and loved ones in making medical decisions. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2005 Oct; 30(4):342-53.
Score: 0.009
-
Duty to warn about hereditary disease risks. JAMA. 2005 Feb 09; 293(6):676.
Score: 0.008
-
Terri Schiavo and the Roman Catholic tradition of forgoing extraordinary means of care. J Law Med Ethics. 2005; 33(2):359-62.
Score: 0.008
-
"Diseases and natural kinds". Theor Med Bioeth. 2005; 26(6):487-513.
Score: 0.008
-
Confidence and knowledge of medical ethics among interns entering residency in different specialties. J Clin Ethics. 2005; 16(3):230-5.
Score: 0.008
-
The quality of care plans for patients with do-not-resuscitate orders. Arch Intern Med. 2004 Jul 26; 164(14):1573-8.
Score: 0.008
-
Knowledge gaps in heart and lung donation after the circulatory determination of death: Report of a workshop of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2024 Jun; 43(6):1021-1029.
Score: 0.008
-
The wisdom of tradition. Natl Cathol Bioeth Q. 2004; 4(3):449-50.
Score: 0.008
-
Estimating population impact of state triage policies restricting healthcare access for older adults with chronic conditions. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024 01; 72(1):294-296.
Score: 0.007
-
Triage Procedures for Critical Care Resource Allocation During Scarcity. JAMA Netw Open. 2023 08 01; 6(8):e2329688.
Score: 0.007
-
Can medical schools be Catholic? For two reasons, Catholic universities should continue sponsoring such schools. Health Prog. 2003 Jul-Aug; 84(4):10-3, 50.
Score: 0.007
-
Bioethics, conflicts of interest, & the limits of transparency. Hastings Cent Rep. 2003 Jul-Aug; 33(4):40-3.
Score: 0.007
-
Factors associated with the time nurses spend at the bedsides of seriously ill patients with poor prognoses. Med Care. 2003 Apr; 41(4):458-66.
Score: 0.007
-
"They Would Lift My Spirits": Sources of Support for Family Surrogate Decision-Makers at the End of Life. J Hosp Palliat Nurs. 2023 06 01; 25(3):119-123.
Score: 0.007
-
Health care justice and hospice care. Hastings Cent Rep. 2003 Mar-Apr; Suppl:S14-5.
Score: 0.007
-
Informed consent without autonomy. Fordham Urban Law J. 2002 Nov; 30(1):207-20.
Score: 0.007
-
Patients' ratings of quality and satisfaction with care at the end of life. Arch Intern Med. 2002 Oct 14; 162(18):2098-104.
Score: 0.007
-
Sexually transmitted disease: a private matter? Am Fam Physician. 2002 Oct 01; 66(7):1351-2, 1355.
Score: 0.007
-
A biopsychosocial-spiritual model for the care of patients at the end of life. Gerontologist. 2002 Oct; 42 Spec No 3:24-33.
Score: 0.007
-
Can a pain management and palliative care curriculum improve the opioid prescribing practices of medical residents? J Gen Intern Med. 2002 Aug; 17(8):625-31.
Score: 0.007
-
Spirituality in Serious Illness and Health. JAMA. 2022 07 12; 328(2):184-197.
Score: 0.007
-
Sedation, alimentation, hydration, and equivocation: careful conversation about care at the end of life. Ann Intern Med. 2002 Jun 04; 136(11):845-9.
Score: 0.007
-
A scale for measuring patient perceptions of the quality of end-of-life care and satisfaction with treatment: the reliability and validity of QUEST. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2002 Jun; 23(6):458-70.
Score: 0.007
-
Appearance and morality: ethics and otolaryngology-head and neck surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002 Jan; 126(1):4-7.
Score: 0.007
-
A Spanish version of the McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire. J Palliat Care. 2002; 18(2):92-6.
Score: 0.007
-
Proportionality, terminal suffering and the restorative goals of medicine. Theor Med Bioeth. 2002; 23(4-5):321-37.
Score: 0.007
-
Death, dignity, and the theory of value. Ethical Perspect. 2002; 9(2-3):103-18.
Score: 0.007
-
Addressing the religious and spiritual needs of dying patients. West J Med. 2001 Oct; 175(4):251-4.
Score: 0.006
-
I was sick and you came to visit me: time spent at the bedsides of seriously ill patients with poor prognoses. Am J Med. 2001 Oct 01; 111(5):385-9.
Score: 0.006
-
Four views of managed care ethics. Panel discussion. Manag Care. 2001 Aug; 10(8):41-5.
Score: 0.006
-
Religious Involvement, Depressive Symptoms, and Burden in Caregivers of Terminally Ill Patients. J Hosp Palliat Nurs. 2021 06 01; 23(3):271-276.
Score: 0.006
-
At wit's end: forgiveness, dignity, and the care of the dying. J Gen Intern Med. 2001 May; 16(5):335-8.
Score: 0.006
-
Religion, spirituality, and health care: social, ethical, and practical considerations. Am J Med. 2001 Mar; 110(4):283-7.
Score: 0.006
-
Catholic health care: not dead yet. Natl Cathol Bioeth Q. 2001; 1(1):41-50.
Score: 0.006
-
On warning families about genetic risk: the ghost of Tarasoff. Am J Med. 2000 Dec 15; 109(9):738-9.
Score: 0.006
-
Heart and soul: the case of the conjoined twins. America (NY). 2000 Dec 02; 183(18):12-4.
Score: 0.006
-
Decision-making Laws for "Unrepresented" Patients. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2020 11; 17(11):1484-1486.
Score: 0.006
-
Statutes Governing Default Surrogate Decision Making for Mental Health Treatment. Psychiatr Serv. 2021 01 01; 72(1):81-84.
Score: 0.006
-
Responding to intractable terminal suffering. Ann Intern Med. 2000 Oct 03; 133(7):560-2; disc 561-2.
Score: 0.006
-
Palliative treatment of last resort and assisted suicide. Ann Intern Med. 2000 Oct 03; 133(7):562-3.
Score: 0.006
-
Publication of papers on assisted suicide and terminal sedation. Ann Intern Med. 2000 Oct 03; 133(7):564-6.
Score: 0.006
-
Should medical schools be schools for virtue? J Gen Intern Med. 2000 Jul; 15(7):514-6.
Score: 0.006
-
Toward evidence-based statistics. Ann Intern Med. 2000 Mar 21; 132(6):507; author reply 508.
Score: 0.006
-
Physicians' ethical beliefs about cost-control arrangements. Arch Intern Med. 2000 Mar 13; 160(5):649-57.
Score: 0.006
-
The ethical obligation of the dead donor rule. Med Health Care Philos. 2020 Mar; 23(1):43-50.
Score: 0.006
-
Commentary: double effect--intention is the solution, not the problem. J Law Med Ethics. 2000; 28(1):26-9, 2.
Score: 0.006
-
Lying for patients: physician deception of third-party payers. Arch Intern Med. 1999 Oct 25; 159(19):2263-70.
Score: 0.006
-
Is medicine a spiritual practice? Acad Med. 1999 Sep; 74(9):1002-5.
Score: 0.006
-
Do patients die because they have DNR orders, or do they have DNR orders because they are going to die? Med Care. 1999 Aug; 37(8):719-21.
Score: 0.006
-
What is an oath and why should a physician swear one? Theor Med Bioeth. 1999 Aug; 20(4):329-46.
Score: 0.006
-
The rule of double effect: clearing up the double talk. Arch Intern Med. 1999 Mar 22; 159(6):545-50.
Score: 0.005
-
Decisions to Withdraw Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support: Patient Characteristics and Ethical Considerations. Mayo Clin Proc. 2019 04; 94(4):620-627.
Score: 0.005
-
End-of-life decision making: when patients and surrogates disagree. J Clin Ethics. 1999; 10(4):286-93.
Score: 0.005
-
What should men know about prostate-specific antigen screening before giving informed consent? Am J Med. 1998 Oct; 105(4):266-74.
Score: 0.005
-
The call of the sirens: ethically navigating the sea of nonvalidated therapies. J Refract Surg. 1998 Sep-Oct; 14(5):559-66.
Score: 0.005
-
Physician-Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia: Emerging Issues From a Global Perspective. J Palliat Care. 2018 Oct; 33(4):197-203.
Score: 0.005
-
Physician resource use and willingness to participate in assisted suicide. Arch Intern Med. 1998 May 11; 158(9):974-8.
Score: 0.005
-
The accuracy of substituted judgments in patients with terminal diagnoses. Ann Intern Med. 1998 Apr 15; 128(8):621-9.
Score: 0.005
-
The preparedness of students to discuss end-of-life issues with patients. Acad Med. 1998 Apr; 73(4):418-22.
Score: 0.005
-
Killing and allowing to die: another look. J Law Med Ethics. 1998; 26(1):55-64, 4.
Score: 0.005
-
The Views of Clergy Regarding Ethical Controversies in Care at the End of Life. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 01; 55(1):65-74.e9.
Score: 0.005
-
End-of-life care. JAMA. 1997 Jun 18; 277(23):1854-5.
Score: 0.005
-
Cancer, managed care, and therapeutic research: an ethicist's view. HMO Pract. 1997 Jun; 11(2):59-62.
Score: 0.005
-
Ethical Analysis of Withdrawing Total Artificial Heart Support. Mayo Clin Proc. 2017 05; 92(5):719-725.
Score: 0.005
-
Who Decides When a Patient Can't? Statutes on Alternate Decision Makers. N Engl J Med. 2017 Apr 13; 376(15):1478-1482.
Score: 0.005
-
Ethics education for medical house officers: long-term improvements in knowledge and confidence. J Med Ethics. 1997 Apr; 23(2):88-92.
Score: 0.005
-
Physician-Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia in the ICU: A Dialogue on Core Ethical Issues. Crit Care Med. 2017 Feb; 45(2):149-155.
Score: 0.005
-
A computerized system for entering orders to limit treatment: implementation and evaluation. J Clin Ethics. 1997; 8(3):258-63.
Score: 0.005
-
Do the ward notes reflect the quality of end-of-life care? J Med Ethics. 1996 Dec; 22(6):344-8.
Score: 0.005
-
Strategies to promote the use of advance directives in a residency outpatient practice. J Gen Intern Med. 1996 Nov; 11(11):657-63.
Score: 0.005
-
The Impact of Unrealistic Optimism on Informed Consent in Early-Phase Oncology Trials. IRB. 2016 Sep-Oct; 38(5):1-7.
Score: 0.005
-
Why conscientious objection merits respect. CMAJ. 2016 08 09; 188(11):822-3.
Score: 0.005
-
Patient and caregiver characteristics related to completion of advance directives in terminally ill patients. Palliat Support Care. 2017 02; 15(1):12-19.
Score: 0.004
-
The effect of pharmaceutical benefits managers: is it being evaluated? Ann Intern Med. 1996 May 15; 124(10):906-13.
Score: 0.004
-
Decision-Making of Patients With Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators at End of Life: Family Members' Experiences. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2017 Jul; 34(6):518-523.
Score: 0.004
-
Dispositional optimism and therapeutic expectations in early-phase oncology trials. Cancer. 2016 Apr 15; 122(8):1238-46.
Score: 0.004
-
Informed consent in emergency medicine: ethics under fire. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 1996 Feb; 14(1):245-54.
Score: 0.004
-
The impact of media coverage on practice. J Gen Intern Med. 1996 Jan; 11(1):62.
Score: 0.004
-
Do the bishops have it right on health care reform? Christ Bioeth. 1996; 2(3):309-25.
Score: 0.004
-
Knowledge, confidence, and attitudes regarding medical ethics: how do faculty and housestaff compare? Acad Med. 1995 Nov; 70(11):1038-40.
Score: 0.004
-
Symptoms and fear in heart failure patients approaching end of life: a mixed methods study. J Clin Nurs. 2015 Nov; 24(21-22):3215-23.
Score: 0.004
-
Symptom frequency, severity, and quality of life among persons with three disease trajectories: cancer, ALS, and CHF. Appl Nurs Res. 2015 Nov; 28(4):311-5.
Score: 0.004
-
Creating a dignified option: ethical considerations in the formulation of prehospital DNR protocol. Am J Emerg Med. 1995 Mar; 13(2):223-8.
Score: 0.004
-
Managed care and managed death. Arch Intern Med. 1995 Jan 23; 155(2):133-6.
Score: 0.004
-
Are withholding and withdrawing therapy always morally equivalent? J Med Ethics. 1994 Dec; 20(4):218-22; discussion 223-4.
Score: 0.004
-
Long-term effects of ethics education on the quality of care for patients who have do-not-resuscitate orders. J Gen Intern Med. 1994 Nov; 9(11):622-6.
Score: 0.004
-
Death and human dignity. Linacre Q. 1994 Nov; 61(4):27-36.
Score: 0.004
-
More talk, less paper: predicting the accuracy of substituted judgments. Am J Med. 1994 May; 96(5):432-8.
Score: 0.004
-
Value of cancer care: ethical considerations for the practicing oncologist. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2014; e146-9.
Score: 0.004
-
Patients' perceptions of the quality of informed consent for common medical procedures. J Clin Ethics. 1994; 5(3):189-94.
Score: 0.004
-
Ethical considerations. Crit Care Clin. 1993 Oct; 9(4):775-89.
Score: 0.004
-
A randomized trial of ethics education for medical house officers. J Med Ethics. 1993 Sep; 19(3):157-63.
Score: 0.004
-
Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage and the challenge of surgical decision making: a review. Neurosurg Focus. 2013 May; 34(5):E1.
Score: 0.004
-
What's so special about medicine? Theor Med. 1993 Mar; 14(1):27-42.
Score: 0.004
-
A Web-based communication aid for patients with cancer: the CONNECT Study. Cancer. 2013 Apr 01; 119(7):1437-45.
Score: 0.004
-
Research participants' high expectations of benefit in early-phase oncology trials: are we asking the right question? J Clin Oncol. 2012 Dec 10; 30(35):4396-400.
Score: 0.003
-
Dignity in end-of-life care: results of a national survey of U.S. physicians. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2012 Sep; 44(3):331-9.
Score: 0.003
-
The quality of mercy. Caring for patients with 'do not resuscitate' orders. JAMA. 1992 Feb 05; 267(5):682-6.
Score: 0.003
-
Approaching patients and family members who hope for a miracle. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2011 Jul; 42(1):119-25.
Score: 0.003
-
Medical house officers' knowledge, attitudes, and confidence regarding medical ethics. Arch Intern Med. 1990 Dec; 150(12):2509-13.
Score: 0.003
-
By whose authority? Emerging issues in medical ethics. Theol Stud. 1989 Mar; 50:95-119.
Score: 0.003
-
Cancer patient preferences for quality and length of life. Cancer. 2008 Dec 15; 113(12):3459-66.
Score: 0.003
-
Using health communication best practices to develop a web-based provider-patient communication aid: the CONNECT study. Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Jun; 71(3):378-87.
Score: 0.003
-
Expectations of benefit in early-phase clinical trials: implications for assessing the adequacy of informed consent. Med Decis Making. 2008 Jul-Aug; 28(4):575-81.
Score: 0.003
-
The surrogate's experience in authorizing a do not resuscitate order. Palliat Support Care. 2008 Mar; 6(1):13-9.
Score: 0.003
-
Understanding of an aggregate probability statement by patients who are offered participation in Phase I clinical trials. Cancer. 2005 Jan 01; 103(1):140-7.
Score: 0.002
-
An exploration of relative health stock in advanced cancer patients. Med Decis Making. 2004 Nov-Dec; 24(6):614-24.
Score: 0.002
-
Ethics in practice: managed care and the changing health care environment: medicine as a profession managed care ethics working group statement. Ann Intern Med. 2004 Jul 20; 141(2):131-6.
Score: 0.002
-
The clinician as investigator: participating in clinical trials in the practice setting. Circulation. 2004 Jun 01; 109(21):2672-9.
Score: 0.002
-
The clinician as investigator: participating in clinical trials in the practice setting: Appendix 1: fundamentals of study design. Circulation. 2004 Jun 01; 109(21):e302-4.
Score: 0.002
-
The clinician as investigator: participating in clinical trials in the practice setting: Appendix 2: statistical concepts in study design and analysis. Circulation. 2004 Jun 01; 109(21):e305-7.
Score: 0.002
-
Religious importance and practices of patients with a life-threatening illness: implications for screening protocols. Appl Nurs Res. 2003 Aug; 16(3):196-200.
Score: 0.002
-
Perceptions of patients and physicians regarding phase I cancer clinical trials: implications for physician-patient communication. J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jul 01; 21(13):2589-96.
Score: 0.002
-
The correlation between patient characteristics and expectations of benefit from Phase I clinical trials. Cancer. 2003 Jul 01; 98(1):166-75.
Score: 0.002
-
Life-sustaining treatments: what do physicians want and do they express their wishes to others? J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003 Jul; 51(7):961-9.
Score: 0.002
-
Patient expectations of benefit from phase I clinical trials: linguistic considerations in diagnosing a therapeutic misconception. Theor Med Bioeth. 2003; 24(4):329-44.
Score: 0.002
-
Discussing religious and spiritual issues at the end of life: a practical guide for physicians. JAMA. 2002 Feb 13; 287(6):749-54.
Score: 0.002
-
Measuring the effects of managed care on physicians' perceptions of their personal financial incentives. Inquiry. 2000; 37(2):134-45.
Score: 0.001
-
Perceived financial incentives, HMO market penetration, and physicians' practice styles and satisfaction. Health Serv Res. 1999 Apr; 34(1 Pt 2):307-21.
Score: 0.001
-
The timing of do-not-resuscitate orders and hospital costs. J Gen Intern Med. 1999 Mar; 14(3):190-2.
Score: 0.001
-
Spondyloptotic fracture of the cervical spine in a pregnant, anemic Jehovah's Witness: technical and ethical considerations. Case report. J Neurosurg. 1997 Sep; 87(3):458-63.
Score: 0.001
-
Implementation of DNR orders in the Department of Medicine, the Johns Hopkins Hospital. Md Med J. 1988 Jun; 37(6):461-4.
Score: 0.001