Daniel Sulmasy to Male
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Daniel Sulmasy has written about Male.
Connection Strength
0.797
-
Spiritual Needs and Perception of Quality of Care and Satisfaction With Care in Hematology/Medical Oncology Patients: A Multicultural Assessment. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 01; 55(1):56-64.e1.
Score: 0.030
-
Perceptions of control and unrealistic optimism in early-phase cancer trials. J Med Ethics. 2018 02; 44(2):121-127.
Score: 0.030
-
Variations in Unrealistic Optimism Between Acceptors and Decliners of Early Phase Cancer Trials. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2017 10; 12(4):280-288.
Score: 0.030
-
The Trial of Ascertaining Individual Preferences for Loved Ones' Role in End-of-Life Decisions (TAILORED) Study: A Randomized Controlled Trial to Improve Surrogate Decision Making. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017 10; 54(4):455-465.
Score: 0.030
-
A Chinese version of the Spiritual Needs Assessment for patients survey instrument. J Palliat Med. 2012 Dec; 15(12):1297-315.
Score: 0.022
-
The Spiritual Needs Assessment for Patients (SNAP): development and validation of a comprehensive instrument to assess unmet spiritual needs. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2012 Jul; 44(1):44-51.
Score: 0.021
-
What research participants want to know about genetic research results: the impact of "genetic exceptionalism". J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2011 Sep; 6(3):39-46.
Score: 0.020
-
Family understanding of seriously-ill patient preferences for family involvement in healthcare decision making. J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Aug; 26(8):881-6.
Score: 0.019
-
The use of advance directives among patients with left ventricular assist devices. Hosp Pract (1995). 2011 Feb; 39(1):78-84.
Score: 0.019
-
Unrealistic optimism in early-phase oncology trials. IRB. 2011 Jan-Feb; 33(1):1-8.
Score: 0.019
-
The culture of faith and hope: patients' justifications for their high estimations of expected therapeutic benefit when enrolling in early phase oncology trials. Cancer. 2010 Aug 01; 116(15):3702-11.
Score: 0.018
-
Patients' attitudes to informed consent for genomic research with donated samples. Cancer Invest. 2010 Aug; 28(7):726-34.
Score: 0.018
-
Ethical analysis of withdrawing ventricular assist device support. Mayo Clin Proc. 2010 Sep; 85(9):791-7.
Score: 0.018
-
Development and validation of the Family Decision-Making Self-Efficacy Scale. Palliat Support Care. 2009 Sep; 7(3):315-21.
Score: 0.017
-
Spirituality, religion, and clinical care. Chest. 2009 Jun; 135(6):1634-1642.
Score: 0.017
-
Researchers' preferences and attitudes on ethical aspects of genomics research: a comparative study between the USA and Spain. J Med Ethics. 2009 Apr; 35(4):251-7.
Score: 0.017
-
Family health care decision making and self-efficacy with patients with ALS at the end of life. Palliat Support Care. 2008 Sep; 6(3):273-80.
Score: 0.016
-
Decision-making in patients with advanced cancer compared with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Med Ethics. 2008 Sep; 34(9):664-8.
Score: 0.016
-
Beliefs and attitudes of nurses and physicians about do not resuscitate orders and who should speak to patients and families about them. Crit Care Med. 2008 Jun; 36(6):1817-22.
Score: 0.016
-
U.S. medical students' perceptions of the adequacy of their schools' curricular attention to care at the end of life: 1998-2006. J Palliat Med. 2008 Jun; 11(5):707-16.
Score: 0.016
-
Physicians' confidence in discussing do not resuscitate orders with patients and surrogates. J Med Ethics. 2008 Feb; 34(2):96-101.
Score: 0.016
-
Within you/without you: biotechnology, ontology, and ethics. J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Jan; 23 Suppl 1:69-72.
Score: 0.015
-
Is failure to meet spiritual needs associated with cancer patients' perceptions of quality of care and their satisfaction with care? J Clin Oncol. 2007 Dec 20; 25(36):5753-7.
Score: 0.015
-
How would terminally ill patients have others make decisions for them in the event of decisional incapacity? A longitudinal study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007 Dec; 55(12):1981-8.
Score: 0.015
-
When patients lack capacity: the roles that patients with terminal diagnoses would choose for their physicians and loved ones in making medical decisions. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2005 Oct; 30(4):342-53.
Score: 0.013
-
Confidence and knowledge of medical ethics among interns entering residency in different specialties. J Clin Ethics. 2005; 16(3):230-5.
Score: 0.013
-
The quality of care plans for patients with do-not-resuscitate orders. Arch Intern Med. 2004 Jul 26; 164(14):1573-8.
Score: 0.012
-
Factors associated with the time nurses spend at the bedsides of seriously ill patients with poor prognoses. Med Care. 2003 Apr; 41(4):458-66.
Score: 0.011
-
Patients' ratings of quality and satisfaction with care at the end of life. Arch Intern Med. 2002 Oct 14; 162(18):2098-104.
Score: 0.011
-
Sexually transmitted disease: a private matter? Am Fam Physician. 2002 Oct 01; 66(7):1351-2, 1355.
Score: 0.011
-
Can a pain management and palliative care curriculum improve the opioid prescribing practices of medical residents? J Gen Intern Med. 2002 Aug; 17(8):625-31.
Score: 0.011
-
Sedation, alimentation, hydration, and equivocation: careful conversation about care at the end of life. Ann Intern Med. 2002 Jun 04; 136(11):845-9.
Score: 0.010
-
A scale for measuring patient perceptions of the quality of end-of-life care and satisfaction with treatment: the reliability and validity of QUEST. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2002 Jun; 23(6):458-70.
Score: 0.010
-
Appearance and morality: ethics and otolaryngology-head and neck surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002 Jan; 126(1):4-7.
Score: 0.010
-
Addressing the religious and spiritual needs of dying patients. West J Med. 2001 Oct; 175(4):251-4.
Score: 0.010
-
I was sick and you came to visit me: time spent at the bedsides of seriously ill patients with poor prognoses. Am J Med. 2001 Oct 01; 111(5):385-9.
Score: 0.010
-
Decisions to Withdraw Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support: Patient Characteristics and Ethical Considerations. Mayo Clin Proc. 2019 04; 94(4):620-627.
Score: 0.008
-
End-of-life decision making: when patients and surrogates disagree. J Clin Ethics. 1999; 10(4):286-93.
Score: 0.008
-
What should men know about prostate-specific antigen screening before giving informed consent? Am J Med. 1998 Oct; 105(4):266-74.
Score: 0.008
-
Physician-Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia: Emerging Issues From a Global Perspective. J Palliat Care. 2018 Oct; 33(4):197-203.
Score: 0.008
-
The accuracy of substituted judgments in patients with terminal diagnoses. Ann Intern Med. 1998 Apr 15; 128(8):621-9.
Score: 0.008
-
The preparedness of students to discuss end-of-life issues with patients. Acad Med. 1998 Apr; 73(4):418-22.
Score: 0.008
-
The Views of Clergy Regarding Ethical Controversies in Care at the End of Life. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 01; 55(1):65-74.e9.
Score: 0.008
-
Ethical Analysis of Withdrawing Total Artificial Heart Support. Mayo Clin Proc. 2017 05; 92(5):719-725.
Score: 0.007
-
A computerized system for entering orders to limit treatment: implementation and evaluation. J Clin Ethics. 1997; 8(3):258-63.
Score: 0.007
-
Strategies to promote the use of advance directives in a residency outpatient practice. J Gen Intern Med. 1996 Nov; 11(11):657-63.
Score: 0.007
-
Patient and caregiver characteristics related to completion of advance directives in terminally ill patients. Palliat Support Care. 2017 02; 15(1):12-19.
Score: 0.007
-
Decision-Making of Patients With Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators at End of Life: Family Members' Experiences. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2017 Jul; 34(6):518-523.
Score: 0.007
-
Dispositional optimism and therapeutic expectations in early-phase oncology trials. Cancer. 2016 Apr 15; 122(8):1238-46.
Score: 0.007
-
Knowledge, confidence, and attitudes regarding medical ethics: how do faculty and housestaff compare? Acad Med. 1995 Nov; 70(11):1038-40.
Score: 0.007
-
Symptoms and fear in heart failure patients approaching end of life: a mixed methods study. J Clin Nurs. 2015 Nov; 24(21-22):3215-23.
Score: 0.007
-
Symptom frequency, severity, and quality of life among persons with three disease trajectories: cancer, ALS, and CHF. Appl Nurs Res. 2015 Nov; 28(4):311-5.
Score: 0.006
-
Long-term effects of ethics education on the quality of care for patients who have do-not-resuscitate orders. J Gen Intern Med. 1994 Nov; 9(11):622-6.
Score: 0.006
-
More talk, less paper: predicting the accuracy of substituted judgments. Am J Med. 1994 May; 96(5):432-8.
Score: 0.006
-
Patients' perceptions of the quality of informed consent for common medical procedures. J Clin Ethics. 1994; 5(3):189-94.
Score: 0.006
-
A Web-based communication aid for patients with cancer: the CONNECT Study. Cancer. 2013 Apr 01; 119(7):1437-45.
Score: 0.005
-
Research participants' high expectations of benefit in early-phase oncology trials: are we asking the right question? J Clin Oncol. 2012 Dec 10; 30(35):4396-400.
Score: 0.005
-
Dignity in end-of-life care: results of a national survey of U.S. physicians. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2012 Sep; 44(3):331-9.
Score: 0.005
-
The quality of mercy. Caring for patients with 'do not resuscitate' orders. JAMA. 1992 Feb 05; 267(5):682-6.
Score: 0.005
-
Medical house officers' knowledge, attitudes, and confidence regarding medical ethics. Arch Intern Med. 1990 Dec; 150(12):2509-13.
Score: 0.005
-
Cancer patient preferences for quality and length of life. Cancer. 2008 Dec 15; 113(12):3459-66.
Score: 0.004
-
Using health communication best practices to develop a web-based provider-patient communication aid: the CONNECT study. Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Jun; 71(3):378-87.
Score: 0.004
-
Expectations of benefit in early-phase clinical trials: implications for assessing the adequacy of informed consent. Med Decis Making. 2008 Jul-Aug; 28(4):575-81.
Score: 0.004
-
Understanding of an aggregate probability statement by patients who are offered participation in Phase I clinical trials. Cancer. 2005 Jan 01; 103(1):140-7.
Score: 0.003
-
An exploration of relative health stock in advanced cancer patients. Med Decis Making. 2004 Nov-Dec; 24(6):614-24.
Score: 0.003
-
Religious importance and practices of patients with a life-threatening illness: implications for screening protocols. Appl Nurs Res. 2003 Aug; 16(3):196-200.
Score: 0.003
-
Perceptions of patients and physicians regarding phase I cancer clinical trials: implications for physician-patient communication. J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jul 01; 21(13):2589-96.
Score: 0.003
-
The correlation between patient characteristics and expectations of benefit from Phase I clinical trials. Cancer. 2003 Jul 01; 98(1):166-75.
Score: 0.003
-
Life-sustaining treatments: what do physicians want and do they express their wishes to others? J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003 Jul; 51(7):961-9.
Score: 0.003
-
The timing of do-not-resuscitate orders and hospital costs. J Gen Intern Med. 1999 Mar; 14(3):190-2.
Score: 0.002