The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Daniel Sulmasy to Comprehension

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Daniel Sulmasy has written about Comprehension.
Connection Strength

1.461
  1. Variations in Unrealistic Optimism Between Acceptors and Decliners of Early Phase Cancer Trials. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2017 10; 12(4):280-288.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.564
  2. Family understanding of seriously-ill patient preferences for family involvement in healthcare decision making. J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Aug; 26(8):881-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.365
  3. Perceptions of control and unrealistic optimism in early-phase cancer trials. J Med Ethics. 2018 02; 44(2):121-127.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.141
  4. Dispositional optimism and therapeutic expectations in early-phase oncology trials. Cancer. 2016 Apr 15; 122(8):1238-46.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.128
  5. The culture of faith and hope: patients' justifications for their high estimations of expected therapeutic benefit when enrolling in early phase oncology trials. Cancer. 2010 Aug 01; 116(15):3702-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.087
  6. Expectations of benefit in early-phase clinical trials: implications for assessing the adequacy of informed consent. Med Decis Making. 2008 Jul-Aug; 28(4):575-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.074
  7. Patient expectations of benefit from phase I clinical trials: linguistic considerations in diagnosing a therapeutic misconception. Theor Med Bioeth. 2003; 24(4):329-44.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  8. Patients' perceptions of the quality of informed consent for common medical procedures. J Clin Ethics. 1994; 5(3):189-94.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  9. Medical house officers' knowledge, attitudes, and confidence regarding medical ethics. Arch Intern Med. 1990 Dec; 150(12):2509-13.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.