The University of Chicago Header Logo

Connection

Daniel Sulmasy to Terminally Ill

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Daniel Sulmasy has written about Terminally Ill.
Connection Strength

1.694
  1. Decision-making in patients with advanced cancer compared with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Med Ethics. 2008 Sep; 34(9):664-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.313
  2. How would terminally ill patients have others make decisions for them in the event of decisional incapacity? A longitudinal study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007 Dec; 55(12):1981-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.296
  3. Spiritual issues in the care of dying patients: ". . . it's okay between me and god". JAMA. 2006 Sep 20; 296(11):1385-92.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.273
  4. Proportionality, terminal suffering and the restorative goals of medicine. Theor Med Bioeth. 2002; 23(4-5):321-37.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.197
  5. End-of-life decision making: when patients and surrogates disagree. J Clin Ethics. 1999; 10(4):286-93.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.160
  6. The accuracy of substituted judgments in patients with terminal diagnoses. Ann Intern Med. 1998 Apr 15; 128(8):621-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.152
  7. Patient and caregiver characteristics related to completion of advance directives in terminally ill patients. Palliat Support Care. 2017 02; 15(1):12-19.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.134
  8. Addressing the religious and spiritual needs of dying patients. West J Med. 2001 Oct; 175(4):251-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  9. Religious Involvement, Depressive Symptoms, and Burden in Caregivers of Terminally Ill Patients. J Hosp Palliat Nurs. 2021 06 01; 23(3):271-276.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.047
  10. The preparedness of students to discuss end-of-life issues with patients. Acad Med. 1998 Apr; 73(4):418-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  11. End-of-life care. JAMA. 1997 Jun 18; 277(23):1854-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
Connection Strength

The connection strength for concepts is the sum of the scores for each matching publication.

Publication scores are based on many factors, including how long ago they were written and whether the person is a first or senior author.