Daniel Sulmasy to Surveys and Questionnaires
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Daniel Sulmasy has written about Surveys and Questionnaires.
Connection Strength
1.229
-
A Chinese version of the Spiritual Needs Assessment for patients survey instrument. J Palliat Med. 2012 Dec; 15(12):1297-315.
Score: 0.225
-
A prospective trial of a new policy eliminating signed consent for do not resuscitate orders. J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Dec; 21(12):1261-8.
Score: 0.150
-
A Spanish version of the McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire. J Palliat Care. 2002; 18(2):92-6.
Score: 0.106
-
Spiritual Needs and Perception of Quality of Care and Satisfaction With Care in Hematology/Medical Oncology Patients: A Multicultural Assessment. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 01; 55(1):56-64.e1.
Score: 0.079
-
Perceptions of control and unrealistic optimism in early-phase cancer trials. J Med Ethics. 2018 02; 44(2):121-127.
Score: 0.078
-
Variations in Unrealistic Optimism Between Acceptors and Decliners of Early Phase Cancer Trials. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2017 10; 12(4):280-288.
Score: 0.078
-
The Spiritual Needs Assessment for Patients (SNAP): development and validation of a comprehensive instrument to assess unmet spiritual needs. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2012 Jul; 44(1):44-51.
Score: 0.055
-
Unrealistic optimism in early-phase oncology trials. IRB. 2011 Jan-Feb; 33(1):1-8.
Score: 0.050
-
Researchers' preferences and attitudes on ethical aspects of genomics research: a comparative study between the USA and Spain. J Med Ethics. 2009 Apr; 35(4):251-7.
Score: 0.044
-
U.S. medical students' perceptions of the adequacy of their schools' curricular attention to care at the end of life: 1998-2006. J Palliat Med. 2008 Jun; 11(5):707-16.
Score: 0.042
-
Is failure to meet spiritual needs associated with cancer patients' perceptions of quality of care and their satisfaction with care? J Clin Oncol. 2007 Dec 20; 25(36):5753-7.
Score: 0.040
-
How would terminally ill patients have others make decisions for them in the event of decisional incapacity? A longitudinal study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007 Dec; 55(12):1981-8.
Score: 0.040
-
Patients' ratings of quality and satisfaction with care at the end of life. Arch Intern Med. 2002 Oct 14; 162(18):2098-104.
Score: 0.028
-
A biopsychosocial-spiritual model for the care of patients at the end of life. Gerontologist. 2002 Oct; 42 Spec No 3:24-33.
Score: 0.028
-
Physicians' ethical beliefs about cost-control arrangements. Arch Intern Med. 2000 Mar 13; 160(5):649-57.
Score: 0.023
-
End-of-life decision making: when patients and surrogates disagree. J Clin Ethics. 1999; 10(4):286-93.
Score: 0.022
-
Physician resource use and willingness to participate in assisted suicide. Arch Intern Med. 1998 May 11; 158(9):974-8.
Score: 0.021
-
The Views of Clergy Regarding Ethical Controversies in Care at the End of Life. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 01; 55(1):65-74.e9.
Score: 0.020
-
Do the ward notes reflect the quality of end-of-life care? J Med Ethics. 1996 Dec; 22(6):344-8.
Score: 0.019
-
Patient and caregiver characteristics related to completion of advance directives in terminally ill patients. Palliat Support Care. 2017 02; 15(1):12-19.
Score: 0.018
-
Decision-Making of Patients With Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators at End of Life: Family Members' Experiences. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2017 Jul; 34(6):518-523.
Score: 0.018
-
Symptoms and fear in heart failure patients approaching end of life: a mixed methods study. J Clin Nurs. 2015 Nov; 24(21-22):3215-23.
Score: 0.017
-
Medical house officers' knowledge, attitudes, and confidence regarding medical ethics. Arch Intern Med. 1990 Dec; 150(12):2509-13.
Score: 0.012
-
Using health communication best practices to develop a web-based provider-patient communication aid: the CONNECT study. Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Jun; 71(3):378-87.
Score: 0.010
-
Perceived financial incentives, HMO market penetration, and physicians' practice styles and satisfaction. Health Serv Res. 1999 Apr; 34(1 Pt 2):307-21.
Score: 0.005