Elbert Huang to Adolescent
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Elbert Huang has written about Adolescent.
Connection Strength
0.868
-
The Economic Evaluation of Team Clinic-Group Approach to a Care Model of Early Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes. J Pediatr Health Care. 2022 Sep-Oct; 36(5):430-437.
Score: 0.089
-
14. Children and Adolescents: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2022. Diabetes Care. 2022 01 01; 45(Suppl 1):S208-S231.
Score: 0.085
-
Differences in the Receipt of Low-Value Services Between Publicly and Privately Insured Children. Pediatrics. 2020 02; 145(2).
Score: 0.074
-
Cost-effectiveness of Shared Telemedicine Appointments in Young Adults With T1D: CoYoT1 Trial. Diabetes Care. 2019 08; 42(8):1589-1592.
Score: 0.072
-
Use of Low-Value Pediatric Services Among the Commercially Insured. Pediatrics. 2016 12; 138(6).
Score: 0.060
-
Implications of the new definition of diabetes for health disparities. J Natl Med Assoc. 2011 Mar; 103(3):219-23.
Score: 0.040
-
Validation of measures of satisfaction with and impact of continuous and conventional glucose monitoring. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2010 Sep; 12(9):679-84.
Score: 0.039
-
The cost-effectiveness of continuous glucose monitoring in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2010 Jun; 33(6):1269-74.
Score: 0.038
-
The association between the number of prescription medications and incident falls in a multi-ethnic population of adult type-2 diabetes patients: the diabetes and aging study. J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Feb; 25(2):141-6.
Score: 0.037
-
The increasing number of clinical items addressed during the time of adult primary care visits. J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Dec; 23(12):2058-65.
Score: 0.034
-
JDRF randomized clinical trial to assess the efficacy of real-time continuous glucose monitoring in the management of type 1 diabetes: research design and methods. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2008 Aug; 10(4):310-21.
Score: 0.034
-
The cost-effectiveness of improving diabetes care in U.S. federally qualified community health centers. Health Serv Res. 2007 Dec; 42(6 Pt 1):2174-93; discussion 2294-323.
Score: 0.032
-
The landmark JDRF continuous glucose monitoring randomized trials: a look back at the accumulated evidence. J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2012 Aug; 5(4):380-7.
Score: 0.022
-
National patterns in the treatment of urinary tract infections in women by ambulatory care physicians. Arch Intern Med. 2002 Jan 14; 162(1):41-7.
Score: 0.021
-
Building and experimenting with an agent-based model to study the population-level impact of CommunityRx, a clinic-based community resource referral intervention. PLoS Comput Biol. 2021 10; 17(10):e1009471.
Score: 0.021
-
Cost and healthcare utilization analysis of culturally sensitive, shared medical appointment model for Latino children with type 1 diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes. 2021 08; 22(5):816-822.
Score: 0.020
-
Optimal sampling intervals to assess long-term glycemic control using continuous glucose monitoring. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2011 Mar; 13(3):351-8.
Score: 0.020
-
Factors predictive of severe hypoglycemia in type 1 diabetes: analysis from the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation continuous glucose monitoring randomized control trial dataset. Diabetes Care. 2011 Mar; 34(3):586-90.
Score: 0.020
-
Provider and Staff Morale, Job Satisfaction, and Burnout over a 4-Year Medical Home Intervention. J Gen Intern Med. 2019 06; 34(6):952-959.
Score: 0.018
-
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Diabetes Screening Between Asian Americans and Other Adults: BRFSS 2012-2014. J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Apr; 32(4):423-429.
Score: 0.015
-
Health utilities for children and adults with type 1 diabetes. Med Care. 2011 Oct; 49(10):924-31.
Score: 0.010
-
Satisfaction with continuous glucose monitoring in adults and youths with Type 1 diabetes. Diabet Med. 2011 Sep; 28(9):1118-22.
Score: 0.010
-
Insulin-like growth factor binding protein 5 suppresses tumor growth and metastasis of human osteosarcoma. Oncogene. 2011 Sep 15; 30(37):3907-17.
Score: 0.010
-
Hemoglobin A1c and mean glucose in patients with type 1 diabetes: analysis of data from the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation continuous glucose monitoring randomized trial. Diabetes Care. 2011 Mar; 34(3):540-4.
Score: 0.010
-
Quality-of-life measures in children and adults with type 1 diabetes: Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Continuous Glucose Monitoring randomized trial. Diabetes Care. 2010 Oct; 33(10):2175-7.
Score: 0.010
-
Factors predictive of use and of benefit from continuous glucose monitoring in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2009 Nov; 32(11):1947-53.
Score: 0.009
-
The effect of continuous glucose monitoring in well-controlled type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2009 Aug; 32(8):1378-83.
Score: 0.009
-
Continuous glucose monitoring and intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008 Oct 02; 359(14):1464-76.
Score: 0.008