Elbert Huang to Adult
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Elbert Huang has written about Adult.
Connection Strength
1.235
-
Moderation of associations between weight discrimination and diabetes status by psychosocial factors. J Behav Med. 2024 Apr; 47(2):244-254.
Score: 0.062
-
Cost-effectiveness of Shared Telemedicine Appointments in Young Adults With T1D: CoYoT1 Trial. Diabetes Care. 2019 08; 42(8):1589-1592.
Score: 0.045
-
Cost-effectiveness of Initiating an Insulin Pump in T1D Adults Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring Compared with Multiple Daily Insulin Injections: The DIAMOND Randomized Trial. Med Decis Making. 2018 11; 38(8):942-953.
Score: 0.044
-
Medicaid Eligibility Expansions May Address Gaps In Access To Diabetes Medications. Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 08; 37(8):1200-1207.
Score: 0.043
-
Cost-effectiveness of Continuous Glucose Monitoring for Adults With Type 1 Diabetes Compared With Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose: The DIAMOND Randomized Trial. Diabetes Care. 2018 06; 41(6):1227-1234.
Score: 0.042
-
Individualized Glycemic Control for U.S. Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2018 02 06; 168(3):170-178.
Score: 0.041
-
Health Care Use and Spending for Medicaid Enrollees in Federally Qualified Health Centers Versus Other Primary Care Settings. Am J Public Health. 2016 11; 106(11):1981-1989.
Score: 0.038
-
Ten-year hemoglobin A1c trajectories and outcomes in type 2 diabetes mellitus: The Diabetes & Aging Study. J Diabetes Complications. 2017 01; 31(1):94-100.
Score: 0.037
-
Revisiting Disparities in Quality of Care Among US Adults With Diabetes in the Era of Individualized Care, NHANES 2007-2010. Med Care. 2015 Jan; 53(1):25-31.
Score: 0.033
-
Incidence of remission in adults with type 2 diabetes: the diabetes & aging study. Diabetes Care. 2014 Dec; 37(12):3188-95.
Score: 0.033
-
Health care utilization and receipt of preventive care for patients seen at federally funded health centers compared to other sites of primary care. Health Serv Res. 2014 Oct; 49(5):1498-518.
Score: 0.032
-
The association of English ability and glycemic control among Latinos with diabetes. Ethn Dis. 2014; 24(1):28-34.
Score: 0.031
-
Cost-effectiveness of MODY genetic testing: translating genomic advances into practical health applications. Diabetes Care. 2014; 37(1):202-9.
Score: 0.030
-
Public health implications of recommendations to individualize glycemic targets in adults with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2013 Jan; 36(1):84-9.
Score: 0.028
-
Implications of the new definition of diabetes for health disparities. J Natl Med Assoc. 2011 Mar; 103(3):219-23.
Score: 0.026
-
Validation of measures of satisfaction with and impact of continuous and conventional glucose monitoring. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2010 Sep; 12(9):679-84.
Score: 0.025
-
The public health implications of the cost-effectiveness of bariatric surgery for diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2010 Sep; 33(9):2126-8.
Score: 0.025
-
The cost-effectiveness of continuous glucose monitoring in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2010 Jun; 33(6):1269-74.
Score: 0.024
-
The association between the number of prescription medications and incident falls in a multi-ethnic population of adult type-2 diabetes patients: the diabetes and aging study. J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Feb; 25(2):141-6.
Score: 0.023
-
Pancreatic cystic lesions: clinical predictors of malignancy in patients undergoing surgery. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010 Jan 15; 31(2):285-94.
Score: 0.023
-
Changes in racial/ethnic disparities in the prevalence of Type 2 diabetes by obesity level among US adults. Ethn Health. 2009 Oct; 14(5):439-57.
Score: 0.023
-
Racial/ethnic differences in concerns about current and future medications among patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2009 Feb; 32(2):311-6.
Score: 0.022
-
The increasing number of clinical items addressed during the time of adult primary care visits. J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Dec; 23(12):2058-65.
Score: 0.022
-
JDRF randomized clinical trial to assess the efficacy of real-time continuous glucose monitoring in the management of type 1 diabetes: research design and methods. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2008 Aug; 10(4):310-21.
Score: 0.021
-
The perceived financial impact of quality improvement efforts in community health centers. J Ambul Care Manage. 2008 Apr-Jun; 31(2):111-9.
Score: 0.021
-
The cost-effectiveness of improving diabetes care in U.S. federally qualified community health centers. Health Serv Res. 2007 Dec; 42(6 Pt 1):2174-93; discussion 2294-323.
Score: 0.020
-
Patient perceptions of quality of life with diabetes-related complications and treatments. Diabetes Care. 2007 Oct; 30(10):2478-83.
Score: 0.020
-
The complexity of medication regimens and test ordering for patients with diabetes from 1995 to 2003. Curr Med Res Opin. 2007 Jun; 23(6):1423-30.
Score: 0.020
-
Costs and Health Care Utilization Analysis of Medical Group Visits for Adults With Type 2 Diabetes in Community Health Centers. Med Care. 2023 12 01; 61(12):866-871.
Score: 0.015
-
Quality of Care for US Adults With Medicaid Insurance and Type 2 Diabetes in Federally Qualified Health Centers Compared With Other Primary Care Settings. Med Care. 2022 11 01; 60(11):813-820.
Score: 0.014
-
The landmark JDRF continuous glucose monitoring randomized trials: a look back at the accumulated evidence. J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2012 Aug; 5(4):380-7.
Score: 0.014
-
National patterns in the treatment of urinary tract infections in women by ambulatory care physicians. Arch Intern Med. 2002 Jan 14; 162(1):41-7.
Score: 0.014
-
Longer-term Benefits and Risks of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors in Type 2 Diabetes: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Gen Intern Med. 2022 02; 37(2):439-448.
Score: 0.013
-
Building and experimenting with an agent-based model to study the population-level impact of CommunityRx, a clinic-based community resource referral intervention. PLoS Comput Biol. 2021 10; 17(10):e1009471.
Score: 0.013
-
Cost and healthcare utilization analysis of culturally sensitive, shared medical appointment model for Latino children with type 1 diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes. 2021 08; 22(5):816-822.
Score: 0.013
-
Optimal sampling intervals to assess long-term glycemic control using continuous glucose monitoring. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2011 Mar; 13(3):351-8.
Score: 0.013
-
Factors predictive of severe hypoglycemia in type 1 diabetes: analysis from the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation continuous glucose monitoring randomized control trial dataset. Diabetes Care. 2011 Mar; 34(3):586-90.
Score: 0.013
-
Novel Temperature Trajectory Subphenotypes in COVID-19. Chest. 2020 12; 158(6):2436-2439.
Score: 0.012
-
Practice Changes at U.S. Transplant Centers After the New Adult Heart Allocation Policy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 06 16; 75(23):2906-2916.
Score: 0.012
-
Impact of a Low-Intensity Resource Referral Intervention on Patients' Knowledge, Beliefs, and Use of Community Resources: Results from the CommunityRx Trial. J Gen Intern Med. 2020 03; 35(3):815-823.
Score: 0.012
-
Association of Transplant Center With Survival Benefit Among Adults Undergoing Heart Transplant in the United States. JAMA. 2019 11 12; 322(18):1789-1798.
Score: 0.012
-
The Impact of the Affordable Care Act Medicaid Expansion on Type 2 Diabetes Diagnosis and Treatment: A National Survey of Physicians. J Community Health. 2019 06; 44(3):463-472.
Score: 0.011
-
Provider and Staff Morale, Job Satisfaction, and Burnout over a 4-Year Medical Home Intervention. J Gen Intern Med. 2019 06; 34(6):952-959.
Score: 0.011
-
Reply: Does Overtreatment of Heart Transplantation Candidates Exist? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 08 07; 72(6):703-704.
Score: 0.011
-
Association of Initiation of Basal Insulin Analogs vs Neutral Protamine Hagedorn Insulin With Hypoglycemia-Related Emergency Department Visits or Hospital Admissions and With Glycemic Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes. JAMA. 2018 07 03; 320(1):53-62.
Score: 0.011
-
Geographic Variation in the Treatment of U.S. Adult Heart Transplant Candidates. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 04 24; 71(16):1715-1725.
Score: 0.010
-
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Diabetes Screening Between Asian Americans and Other Adults: BRFSS 2012-2014. J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Apr; 32(4):423-429.
Score: 0.009
-
Management of Diabetes in Long-term Care and Skilled Nursing Facilities: A Position Statement of the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care. 2016 Feb; 39(2):308-18.
Score: 0.009
-
Diabetes and cardiovascular disease in older adults: current status and future directions. Diabetes. 2014 Aug; 63(8):2578-89.
Score: 0.008
-
HbA1c and risk of severe hypoglycemia in type 2 diabetes: the Diabetes and Aging Study. Diabetes Care. 2013 Nov; 36(11):3535-42.
Score: 0.008
-
Patient-provider communication and trust in relation to use of an online patient portal among diabetes patients: The Diabetes and Aging Study. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Nov-Dec; 20(6):1128-31.
Score: 0.007
-
Defining and measuring chronic conditions: imperatives for research, policy, program, and practice. Prev Chronic Dis. 2013 Apr 25; 10:E66.
Score: 0.007
-
Symptom burden of adults with type 2 diabetes across the disease course: diabetes & aging study. J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Dec; 27(12):1674-81.
Score: 0.007
-
Early lessons from an initiative on Chicago's South Side to reduce disparities in diabetes care and outcomes. Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Jan; 31(1):177-86.
Score: 0.007
-
Association of depression with increased risk of dementia in patients with type 2 diabetes: the Diabetes and Aging Study. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2012 Apr; 69(4):410-7.
Score: 0.007
-
Prioritization of care in adults with diabetes and comorbidity. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2011 Dec; 1243:69-87.
Score: 0.007
-
Health utilities for children and adults with type 1 diabetes. Med Care. 2011 Oct; 49(10):924-31.
Score: 0.007
-
Satisfaction with continuous glucose monitoring in adults and youths with Type 1 diabetes. Diabet Med. 2011 Sep; 28(9):1118-22.
Score: 0.007
-
Insulin-like growth factor binding protein 5 suppresses tumor growth and metastasis of human osteosarcoma. Oncogene. 2011 Sep 15; 30(37):3907-17.
Score: 0.006
-
Hemoglobin A1c and mean glucose in patients with type 1 diabetes: analysis of data from the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation continuous glucose monitoring randomized trial. Diabetes Care. 2011 Mar; 34(3):540-4.
Score: 0.006
-
Positive and negative spillovers of the Health Disparities Collaboratives in federally qualified health centers: staff perceptions. Med Care. 2010 Dec; 48(12):1050-6.
Score: 0.006
-
Quality-of-life measures in children and adults with type 1 diabetes: Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Continuous Glucose Monitoring randomized trial. Diabetes Care. 2010 Oct; 33(10):2175-7.
Score: 0.006
-
Sustained benefit of continuous glucose monitoring on A1C, glucose profiles, and hypoglycemia in adults with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2009 Nov; 32(11):2047-9.
Score: 0.006
-
Factors predictive of use and of benefit from continuous glucose monitoring in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2009 Nov; 32(11):1947-53.
Score: 0.006
-
The effect of continuous glucose monitoring in well-controlled type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2009 Aug; 32(8):1378-83.
Score: 0.006
-
Sustaining quality improvement in community health centers: perceptions of leaders and staff. J Ambul Care Manage. 2008 Oct-Dec; 31(4):319-29.
Score: 0.005
-
Insurance status and quality of diabetes care in community health centers. Am J Public Health. 2009 Apr; 99(4):742-7.
Score: 0.005
-
Continuous glucose monitoring and intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008 Oct 02; 359(14):1464-76.
Score: 0.005
-
Predicting changes in staff morale and burnout at community health centers participating in the health disparities collaboratives. Health Serv Res. 2008 Aug; 43(4):1403-23.
Score: 0.005
-
Fluoroquinolone prescribing in the United States: 1995 to 2002. Am J Med. 2005 Mar; 118(3):259-68.
Score: 0.004