Elbert Huang to Blood Glucose
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Elbert Huang has written about Blood Glucose.
Connection Strength
5.522
-
Development and Validation of the Real-World Progression in Diabetes (RAPIDS) Model. Med Decis Making. 2019 02; 39(2):137-151.
Score: 0.484
-
Cost-effectiveness of Continuous Glucose Monitoring for Adults With Type 1 Diabetes Compared With Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose: The DIAMOND Randomized Trial. Diabetes Care. 2018 06; 41(6):1227-1234.
Score: 0.459
-
Potential Overtreatment of Older, Complex Adults With Diabetes. JAMA. 2015 Sep 22-29; 314(12):1280-1.
Score: 0.383
-
Glycemic control, complications, and death in older diabetic patients: the diabetes and aging study. Diabetes Care. 2011 Jun; 34(6):1329-36.
Score: 0.283
-
Validation of measures of satisfaction with and impact of continuous and conventional glucose monitoring. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2010 Sep; 12(9):679-84.
Score: 0.271
-
The cost-effectiveness of continuous glucose monitoring in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2010 Jun; 33(6):1269-74.
Score: 0.263
-
The effect of comorbid illness and functional status on the expected benefits of intensive glucose control in older patients with type 2 diabetes: a decision analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2008 Jul 01; 149(1):11-9.
Score: 0.233
-
The impact of patient preferences on the cost-effectiveness of intensive glucose control in older patients with new-onset diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2006 Feb; 29(2):259-64.
Score: 0.197
-
Diffusion and Disparities: Rural Uptake of Continuous Glucose Monitors. Diabetes Care. 2024 Mar 01; 47(3):344-345.
Score: 0.173
-
The Growing Role of Technology in the Care of Older Adults With Diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2023 08 01; 46(8):1455-1463.
Score: 0.166
-
The Economic Evaluation of Team Clinic-Group Approach to a Care Model of Early Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes. J Pediatr Health Care. 2022 Sep-Oct; 36(5):430-437.
Score: 0.154
-
The landmark JDRF continuous glucose monitoring randomized trials: a look back at the accumulated evidence. J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2012 Aug; 5(4):380-7.
Score: 0.152
-
9. Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2022. Diabetes Care. 2022 01 01; 45(Suppl 1):S125-S143.
Score: 0.149
-
6. Glycemic Targets: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2022. Diabetes Care. 2022 01 01; 45(Suppl 1):S83-S96.
Score: 0.149
-
Optimal sampling intervals to assess long-term glycemic control using continuous glucose monitoring. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2011 Mar; 13(3):351-8.
Score: 0.140
-
Approaches to Risk Assessment Among Older Patients With Diabetes. Curr Diab Rep. 2019 07 19; 19(8):59.
Score: 0.125
-
Cost-effectiveness of Shared Telemedicine Appointments in Young Adults With T1D: CoYoT1 Trial. Diabetes Care. 2019 08; 42(8):1589-1592.
Score: 0.124
-
Cost-effectiveness of Initiating an Insulin Pump in T1D Adults Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring Compared with Multiple Daily Insulin Injections: The DIAMOND Randomized Trial. Med Decis Making. 2018 11; 38(8):942-953.
Score: 0.119
-
The Legacy Effect in Type 2 Diabetes: Impact of Early Glycemic Control on Future Complications (The Diabetes & Aging Study). Diabetes Care. 2019 03; 42(3):416-426.
Score: 0.117
-
Impact and Feasibility of Personalized Decision Support for Older Patients with Diabetes: A Pilot Randomized Trial. Med Decis Making. 2017 07; 37(5):611-617.
Score: 0.101
-
Management of diabetes mellitus in older people with comorbidities. BMJ. 2016 06 15; 353:i2200.
Score: 0.101
-
Geographic Variation in Rosiglitazone Use Surrounding FDA Warnings in the Department of Veterans Affairs. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2015 Dec; 21(12):1214-34.
Score: 0.097
-
Revisiting Disparities in Quality of Care Among US Adults With Diabetes in the Era of Individualized Care, NHANES 2007-2010. Med Care. 2015 Jan; 53(1):25-31.
Score: 0.091
-
Public health implications of recommendations to individualize glycemic targets in adults with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2013 Jan; 36(1):84-9.
Score: 0.078
-
Medication use in older U.S. adults with diabetes mellitus and the potential ramifications of raising the glycemic target. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011 Dec; 59(12):2381-3.
Score: 0.074
-
Hemoglobin A1c and mean glucose in patients with type 1 diabetes: analysis of data from the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation continuous glucose monitoring randomized trial. Diabetes Care. 2011 Mar; 34(3):540-4.
Score: 0.070
-
Sustained benefit of continuous glucose monitoring on A1C, glucose profiles, and hypoglycemia in adults with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2009 Nov; 32(11):2047-9.
Score: 0.063
-
Factors predictive of use and of benefit from continuous glucose monitoring in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2009 Nov; 32(11):1947-53.
Score: 0.063
-
The effect of continuous glucose monitoring in well-controlled type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2009 Aug; 32(8):1378-83.
Score: 0.062
-
Continuous glucose monitoring and intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008 Oct 02; 359(14):1464-76.
Score: 0.059
-
Implications of new geriatric diabetes care guidelines for the assessment of quality of care in older patients. Med Care. 2006 Apr; 44(4):373-7.
Score: 0.050
-
Glycemic control and diabetes complications across health status categories in older adults treated with insulin or insulin secretagogues: The Diabetes & Aging Study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 12; 71(12):3692-3700.
Score: 0.042
-
Validation of a Hypoglycemia Risk Stratification Tool Using Data From Continuous Glucose Monitors. JAMA Netw Open. 2023 03 01; 6(3):e236315.
Score: 0.040
-
The effect of interventions to prevent cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Am J Med. 2001 Dec 01; 111(8):633-42.
Score: 0.037
-
Factors predictive of severe hypoglycemia in type 1 diabetes: analysis from the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation continuous glucose monitoring randomized control trial dataset. Diabetes Care. 2011 Mar; 34(3):586-90.
Score: 0.035
-
Use and Discontinuation of Insulin Treatment Among Adults Aged 75 to 79 Years With Type 2 Diabetes. JAMA Intern Med. 2019 12 01; 179(12):1633-1641.
Score: 0.032
-
Response to Comment on Laiteerapong et al. The Legacy Effect in Type 2 Diabetes: Impact of Early Glycemic Control on Future Complications (The Diabetes & Aging Study). Diabetes Care 2019;42:416-426. Diabetes Care. 2019 03; 42(3):e46-e47.
Score: 0.030
-
Association of Initiation of Basal Insulin Analogs vs Neutral Protamine Hagedorn Insulin With Hypoglycemia-Related Emergency Department Visits or Hospital Admissions and With Glycemic Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes. JAMA. 2018 07 03; 320(1):53-62.
Score: 0.029
-
The Association of Severe Hypoglycemia With Incident Cardiovascular Events and Mortality in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2018 01; 41(1):104-111.
Score: 0.028
-
Risk Factors for Severe Hypoglycemia in Black and White Adults With Diabetes: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. Diabetes Care. 2017 12; 40(12):1661-1667.
Score: 0.028
-
Hemoglobin A1c and Mortality in Older Adults With and Without Diabetes: Results From the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (1988-2011). Diabetes Care. 2017 Apr; 40(4):453-460.
Score: 0.027
-
Management of Diabetes in Long-term Care and Skilled Nursing Facilities: A Position Statement of the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care. 2016 Feb; 39(2):308-18.
Score: 0.025
-
Patients who self-monitor blood glucose and their unused testing results. Am J Manag Care. 2015 Feb 01; 21(2):e119-29.
Score: 0.023
-
Diabetes and cardiovascular disease in older adults: current status and future directions. Diabetes. 2014 Aug; 63(8):2578-89.
Score: 0.022
-
HbA1c and risk of severe hypoglycemia in type 2 diabetes: the Diabetes and Aging Study. Diabetes Care. 2013 Nov; 36(11):3535-42.
Score: 0.021
-
Computer modeling of diabetes and its complications: a report on the Fifth Mount Hood challenge meeting. Value Health. 2013 Jun; 16(4):670-85.
Score: 0.020
-
The risks and benefits of implementing glycemic control guidelines in frail older adults with diabetes mellitus. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011 Apr; 59(4):666-72.
Score: 0.018
-
Quality-of-life measures in children and adults with type 1 diabetes: Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Continuous Glucose Monitoring randomized trial. Diabetes Care. 2010 Oct; 33(10):2175-7.
Score: 0.017