Elbert Huang to Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Elbert Huang has written about Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1.
Connection Strength
4.206
-
Diffusion and Disparities: Rural Uptake of Continuous Glucose Monitors. Diabetes Care. 2024 Mar 01; 47(3):344-345.
Score: 0.600
-
The Economic Evaluation of Team Clinic-Group Approach to a Care Model of Early Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes. J Pediatr Health Care. 2022 Sep-Oct; 36(5):430-437.
Score: 0.535
-
Cost-effectiveness of Shared Telemedicine Appointments in Young Adults With T1D: CoYoT1 Trial. Diabetes Care. 2019 08; 42(8):1589-1592.
Score: 0.433
-
Cost-effectiveness of Initiating an Insulin Pump in T1D Adults Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring Compared with Multiple Daily Insulin Injections: The DIAMOND Randomized Trial. Med Decis Making. 2018 11; 38(8):942-953.
Score: 0.415
-
Cost-effectiveness of Continuous Glucose Monitoring for Adults With Type 1 Diabetes Compared With Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose: The DIAMOND Randomized Trial. Diabetes Care. 2018 06; 41(6):1227-1234.
Score: 0.399
-
Validation of measures of satisfaction with and impact of continuous and conventional glucose monitoring. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2010 Sep; 12(9):679-84.
Score: 0.235
-
The cost-effectiveness of continuous glucose monitoring in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2010 Jun; 33(6):1269-74.
Score: 0.228
-
JDRF randomized clinical trial to assess the efficacy of real-time continuous glucose monitoring in the management of type 1 diabetes: research design and methods. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2008 Aug; 10(4):310-21.
Score: 0.204
-
Realigning diabetes regimens in older adults: a 4S Pathway to guide simplification and deprescribing strategies. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2025 05; 13(5):427-437.
Score: 0.160
-
The landmark JDRF continuous glucose monitoring randomized trials: a look back at the accumulated evidence. J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2012 Aug; 5(4):380-7.
Score: 0.132
-
Cost and healthcare utilization analysis of culturally sensitive, shared medical appointment model for Latino children with type 1 diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes. 2021 08; 22(5):816-822.
Score: 0.123
-
Optimal sampling intervals to assess long-term glycemic control using continuous glucose monitoring. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2011 Mar; 13(3):351-8.
Score: 0.121
-
Factors predictive of severe hypoglycemia in type 1 diabetes: analysis from the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation continuous glucose monitoring randomized control trial dataset. Diabetes Care. 2011 Mar; 34(3):586-90.
Score: 0.121
-
Health utilities for children and adults with type 1 diabetes. Med Care. 2011 Oct; 49(10):924-31.
Score: 0.063
-
Satisfaction with continuous glucose monitoring in adults and youths with Type 1 diabetes. Diabet Med. 2011 Sep; 28(9):1118-22.
Score: 0.063
-
Hemoglobin A1c and mean glucose in patients with type 1 diabetes: analysis of data from the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation continuous glucose monitoring randomized trial. Diabetes Care. 2011 Mar; 34(3):540-4.
Score: 0.061
-
Quality-of-life measures in children and adults with type 1 diabetes: Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Continuous Glucose Monitoring randomized trial. Diabetes Care. 2010 Oct; 33(10):2175-7.
Score: 0.059
-
Sustained benefit of continuous glucose monitoring on A1C, glucose profiles, and hypoglycemia in adults with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2009 Nov; 32(11):2047-9.
Score: 0.055
-
Factors predictive of use and of benefit from continuous glucose monitoring in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2009 Nov; 32(11):1947-53.
Score: 0.055
-
The effect of continuous glucose monitoring in well-controlled type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2009 Aug; 32(8):1378-83.
Score: 0.054
-
Continuous glucose monitoring and intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008 Oct 02; 359(14):1464-76.
Score: 0.051
-
The Impact of Unrelated Future Medical Costs on Economic Evaluation Outcomes for Different Models of Diabetes. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2024 Nov; 22(6):861-869.
Score: 0.039